Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bot clerking, archiving 5 threads, 15 pending requests remain.
→‎Hyatt Regency walkway collapse: one week (full) + note
Line 95: Line 95:
* {{pagelinks|Hyatt Regency walkway collapse}}
* {{pagelinks|Hyatt Regency walkway collapse}}
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' I recently requested IP protection, which was briefly instated. Please renew that for as long as possible. It is disaster hunter season, with the 40th anniversary of the Hyatt disaster plus the ongoing Surfside disaster. Everybody is dying to scoop the news plus original research and inexplicable deletions, including deleting RSes. Now we also have edit warring over the absolute nonsense of cherry-picked and misconstrued policies to justify edit warring, and I have stopped my long-term development of the article until it is protected. Thanks so much. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]][[User talk:Smuckola|(talk)]]</span> 09:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' I recently requested IP protection, which was briefly instated. Please renew that for as long as possible. It is disaster hunter season, with the 40th anniversary of the Hyatt disaster plus the ongoing Surfside disaster. Everybody is dying to scoop the news plus original research and inexplicable deletions, including deleting RSes. Now we also have edit warring over the absolute nonsense of cherry-picked and misconstrued policies to justify edit warring, and I have stopped my long-term development of the article until it is protected. Thanks so much. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]][[User talk:Smuckola|(talk)]]</span> 09:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Full protection|Fully protected]]'''&#32;for a period of '''one week''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#full --> [[User:Smuckola|Smuckola]], unlike my previous protection, this seems more like a content dispute, even if it is the same person or persons. Please initiate a talk page discussion concerning these latest contested edits. If there isn't a substantive response by them in, say, a few days, let me know and I'll convert the full protection to a lengthy semi, instead. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 12:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


=== [[Marcelo Bielsa]] ===
=== [[Marcelo Bielsa]] ===

Revision as of 12:47, 19 July 2021

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Reason: These pages are used to show people how to install RedWarn, an anti-vandalism tool. Currently, any user could edit these pages to contain instructions on installing a lusc (loader) to malicious code, and anyone - even admins - that followed the (malicious) instructions to install RedWarn would have their account compromised. I recommend full-protection on all of these pages considering the seriousness of this. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 18:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: leaning toward declining this preemptive request, but wouldn't mind a second opinion. As well, I sort of doubt there's an admin who has RedWarn installed, though I suppose that's of little import. El_C 04:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I don't know why I said it was of little import, that was pretty dumb. Obviously, if someone with the sysop flag was at risk here, it'd be important. Anyway, I'm okay with preemptive ECP for these, which with respect to the potential risk, probably suffices. El_C 19:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Actually, I think they are. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible. ―Qwerfjkltalk 13:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Nableezy 14:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: As a regular admin action for observed disruption. Feel free to upgrade if desirable --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This page has been subject to various edit warrings. Chefs-kiss (talk) 15:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Full protection has now lapsed and time is needed to see how things develop. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have restored the SP that was removed when I fully protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Died ca 1500-- doubt BLP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Riley1012 (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: risk of collateral damage --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsupported replacement of supported text re the subject matter with the phrase "is English with a Scottish accent". Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Issues resumed immediately as the previous protection expired. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just blocking one IP (206.74.174.242) because the distruption come from a single IP and i believe the IP user is already blocked 3 hours ago. 180.241.209.217 (talk) 04:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Mishary94 (talk) 02:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Flix11 (talk) 04:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced info, removal of sourced. Sjö (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I don't know how many times this has been given temp semis: the destructive vandalism in relation to the GameStop short squeeze will not die down anytime soon. Protection obviously needed. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Engr. Smitty Werben 06:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page seems to be attracting a lot of attention from newly-registered accounts and IP addresses all focused on addition or deletion of unsourced information about unreleased films. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.: Hi 10mmsocket, please notify me if this continues. After the helpful edits of 108.56.139.120, I can't really respond by semi-protecting the page at this time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 08:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I recently requested IP protection, which was briefly instated. Please renew that for as long as possible. It is disaster hunter season, with the 40th anniversary of the Hyatt disaster plus the ongoing Surfside disaster. Everybody is dying to scoop the news plus original research and inexplicable deletions, including deleting RSes. Now we also have edit warring over the absolute nonsense of cherry-picked and misconstrued policies to justify edit warring, and I have stopped my long-term development of the article until it is protected. Thanks so much. — Smuckola(talk) 09:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Smuckola, unlike my previous protection, this seems more like a content dispute, even if it is the same person or persons. Please initiate a talk page discussion concerning these latest contested edits. If there isn't a substantive response by them in, say, a few days, let me know and I'll convert the full protection to a lengthy semi, instead. El_C 12:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High profile figure. Page has suffered vandalism and other Premier League football managers have semi protection on their wikipedia pages, so adding protection for the Bielsa page would be following the norm. Wonderr123 (talk) 11:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism. Mxtt.prior (talk) 11:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]