User talk:Philosopher: Difference between revisions
→Iowa Democratic Party: new section |
Philosopher (talk | contribs) →Iowa Democratic Party: a reply |
||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
== [[Iowa Democratic Party]] == |
== [[Iowa Democratic Party]] == |
||
[[File:Wikipedia-Ambassador-Program-Logo.png|100px|left]] Hey there! I just wanted touch bases with you on the above mentioned article. Before making major edits to articles, please make sure to check the talk page to make sure that it is not a current educational assignment. I have no discrepancy with your edits to the article. However, they usurp the professor's instructions and the educational process of the course. Essentially, the edits that you made are assignments in the [[Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Courses/U.S. Political Parties (Shamira Gelbman)|POL 214: U.S. Political Parties course at Illinois State University]]. The student may now either be required to take on a different article as his assignment or covertly sit back knowing that he has all the answers for the final quiz. ;) On another note, if you are ever interested in participating in the U.S./Global Educational Program, we could always use more Ambassadors. The application process can be found [[Wikipedia:Online Ambassadors/Apply|here]]. Let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, <font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]] (Cindy)</font> 15:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC) |
[[File:Wikipedia-Ambassador-Program-Logo.png|100px|left]] Hey there! I just wanted touch bases with you on the above mentioned article. Before making major edits to articles, please make sure to check the talk page to make sure that it is not a current educational assignment. I have no discrepancy with your edits to the article. However, they usurp the professor's instructions and the educational process of the course. Essentially, the edits that you made are assignments in the [[Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Courses/U.S. Political Parties (Shamira Gelbman)|POL 214: U.S. Political Parties course at Illinois State University]]. The student may now either be required to take on a different article as his assignment or covertly sit back knowing that he has all the answers for the final quiz. ;) On another note, if you are ever interested in participating in the U.S./Global Educational Program, we could always use more Ambassadors. The application process can be found [[Wikipedia:Online Ambassadors/Apply|here]]. Let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, <font color="navy" face="Tahoma">[[User:Cindamuse|Cind.]]</font><font color="purple" face="Tahoma">[[User talk:Cindamuse#top|amuse]] (Cindy)</font> 15:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC){{-}} |
||
Well, I certainly didn't intend to interfere in a course, I was just building an encyclopedia! I was aware of the course, though, even if I wasn't thinking of it when I made the edits (see [[User talk:Sgelbman#Citation templates]]). It's just that when I see a new editor improving an article I've got on my watchlist, I try to help out a little. Especially when I notice such a glaring hole in our categorization scheme while I'm at it. At any rate, that articles still doesn't have much on [[Republican Party of Iowa]], so there should be plenty of room for improvement. If you really want to avoid such edits, though, you could consider using an [[Wikipedia:Editnotice|editnotice]] on the pages of the articles. (I don't know how you'd word it, though, since you'd want to communicate both "don't make edits the student is going to make anyway" '''''and''''' "we don't [[WP:OWN]] the article, please feel free to edit it.") I'll think about applying for that program, thanks for considering me, but am currently involved in [[User talk:Philosopher/Archive 13#Bio project|a rather large project]] (only a few hundred edits to go, but they take a while). Perhaps when I've finished that. --''[[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Philosopher|Let us reason together.]]</sup> 01:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:51, 14 October 2011
|
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Blacklist
I saw, cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Yup, Muong Nha to Mường Nhà, Muong Phang to Mường Phăng, Muong Pon to Mường Pồn.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm done for today now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
{{tb|Steven (WMF)}}
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey there! I just wanted touch bases with you on the above mentioned article. Before making major edits to articles, please make sure to check the talk page to make sure that it is not a current educational assignment. I have no discrepancy with your edits to the article. However, they usurp the professor's instructions and the educational process of the course. Essentially, the edits that you made are assignments in the POL 214: U.S. Political Parties course at Illinois State University. The student may now either be required to take on a different article as his assignment or covertly sit back knowing that he has all the answers for the final quiz. ;) On another note, if you are ever interested in participating in the U.S./Global Educational Program, we could always use more Ambassadors. The application process can be found here. Let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 15:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Well, I certainly didn't intend to interfere in a course, I was just building an encyclopedia! I was aware of the course, though, even if I wasn't thinking of it when I made the edits (see User talk:Sgelbman#Citation templates). It's just that when I see a new editor improving an article I've got on my watchlist, I try to help out a little. Especially when I notice such a glaring hole in our categorization scheme while I'm at it. At any rate, that articles still doesn't have much on Republican Party of Iowa, so there should be plenty of room for improvement. If you really want to avoid such edits, though, you could consider using an editnotice on the pages of the articles. (I don't know how you'd word it, though, since you'd want to communicate both "don't make edits the student is going to make anyway" and "we don't WP:OWN the article, please feel free to edit it.") I'll think about applying for that program, thanks for considering me, but am currently involved in a rather large project (only a few hundred edits to go, but they take a while). Perhaps when I've finished that. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)