Jump to content

Talk:2011 England riots: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 98: Line 98:
Does anyone object to me updating this to be in the true past tense is -> was etc?? [[User:Cosnahang|Cosnahang]] ([[User talk:Cosnahang|talk]]) 19:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Does anyone object to me updating this to be in the true past tense is -> was etc?? [[User:Cosnahang|Cosnahang]] ([[User talk:Cosnahang|talk]]) 19:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
:I'm not clear exactly what changes you are proposing, but I certainly prefer the past tense to the 'historic present' tense. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 21:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
:I'm not clear exactly what changes you are proposing, but I certainly prefer the past tense to the 'historic present' tense. [[User:Sweet6970|Sweet6970]] ([[User talk:Sweet6970|talk]]) 21:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
: Done - please review [[User:Cosnahang|Cosnahang]] ([[User talk:Cosnahang|talk]]) 22:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:05, 14 January 2021

Template:WAP assignment

See also

See also Talk:2011 England riots/map

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2011 England riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Army

The police said they were unable to deal with the riots effectively due to having too few officers who were trained to do so. Has there been any explanation as to why the army weren't sent in to make arrests and stop the rioting? Jim Michael (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's mainly because in the UK, for something like that to happen you'd need an armed inssurrection, not rioting. Deployment of the military for domestic matters in the UK is considered a really bad idea, mainly due to experience in The Troubles--NVDELHm (talk) 10:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inquest verdict

@AmSam13: Please explain how a factual statement about the outcome of a legal case is not neutral. Sweet6970 (talk) 10:20, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verb Tenses & British Grammar

Does anyone object to me updating this to be in the true past tense is -> was etc?? Cosnahang (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear exactly what changes you are proposing, but I certainly prefer the past tense to the 'historic present' tense. Sweet6970 (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done - please review Cosnahang (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]