Jump to content

Talk:Clinical psychology: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Tgil89 (talk | contribs)
53 edits
Update Psychology Capstone assignment details
Pammul (talk | contribs)
41 edits
Update Psychology Capstone assignment details
Line 28: Line 28:
{{WikiProject Medicine |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Medicine |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|July - December 2006]]<br/>[[/Archive 2|January - May 2007]]<br/>[[/Archive 3|July 2007 - July 2008]]}}
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|July - December 2006]]<br/>[[/Archive 2|January - May 2007]]<br/>[[/Archive 3|July 2007 - July 2008]]}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Alabama_at_Birmingham/Psychology_Capstone_(Summer_2021) | assignments = [[User:Pammul|Pammul]] | reviewers = [[User:Tgil89|Tgil89]] | start_date = 2021-05-10 | end_date = 2021-08-06 }}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Alabama_at_Birmingham/Psychology_Capstone_(Summer_2021) | reviewers = [[User:Tgil89|Tgil89]] | start_date = 2021-05-10 | end_date = 2021-08-06 }}




Revision as of 19:51, 17 June 2021

Former good articleClinical psychology was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 23, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 21, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconPsychology B‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 May 2021 and 6 August 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Tgil89.


Archived

Another talk page archive. Left the GA discussion because someone really should tackle that project. —Ash(talk) 02:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA status

This article has been tagged for well over a month but still hasn't been cited, and still contains lists that amount to original research. Is anyone working on citing the article? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for almost six weeks, no response, delisted GA. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

licensing

Original Text:

Unlike the PhD, which is a third level academic degree, the MSW is considered a professional degree (a second level university degree) and is sufficient for basic licensure in most states. < ref >http://www.aswb.org/lic_req.shtml< /ref >

After a cursory review of the site indicated in the original link source, the closest I found to matching this statement is the following:

Can I obtain a license with a non-social work degree?
With a few exceptions, no. There are a few states that offer “associate” type licenses for people without social work degrees (check requirements in the online comparison guide), but those exceptions are extremely limited. For the most part, you must have a degree in social work (BSW or MSW) to obtain a social work license. < ref >http://www.aswb.org/SWL/faqs.asp#NonSWDegree< /ref >

suggesting a full rewrite on this, with the new link source. --Vorik111 (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished sentence?

What does "To date, medical psychologists may prescribe psychotropic medications in Guam, New Mexico, and Louisiana and military psychologists." mean? Is it meant to continue "... and military psychologists may prescribe <such-and-such>."? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.27.39 (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:DSM-IV-TR.jpg

The image File:DSM-IV-TR.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why all references have to be to the Plante book?

There are other texts from authors with a wider research and clinical experience than Plante. Introduction to Clinical Psychology (6th ed) by Nietzel, Bernstein, Kramer and Milich is one example. Ajoykt (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Plante reference is one out of 89 references in the reference list, so your section header about "all references" seems rather bizarre. Some of the other 88 references, such Compas & Gotlib, are cited more often than the Plante reference. Your attempt to remove a published reference to a widely used text by a reputable publisher (now in its 3rd edition) without a clearly stated reason seems odd. It seems especially interesting in view of your recent proposal that the author's biopage on WP be merged into a separate topic. If the Neitzel et al citation has added value beyone the Plante citation (which isn't necessarily the case - books by committee are sometimes hard to read), it can be cited in addition. -- Presearch (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of sources

This article has been edited by a user who is known to have misused sources to unduly promote certain views (see WP:Jagged 85 cleanup). Examination of the sources used by this editor often reveals that the sources have been selectively interpreted or blatantly misrepresented, going beyond any reasonable interpretation of the authors' intent.

Please help by viewing the entry for this article shown at the page, and check the edits to ensure that any claims are valid, and that any references do in fact verify what is claimed.

I searched the page history, and found 4 edits by Jagged 85 (for example, see this edit). Tobby72 (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Clinical psychology/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaypoh (talk · contribs) 06:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Many citation needed tags.
  • Why a whole one paragraph section for salary and employment information? Find references and merge into larger section. Or remove.
  • Why a list of journals?
  • List in Professional practice section, convert to prose

Sorry I have to fail this. Add references, address content problems, then nominate again.

--Kaypoh (talk) 06:28, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

American centric

This article describes clinical psychology as it developed in the USA and the training there. That ought to be clarified further and the development and training in other counties could be added. USA was important in the historical development but the article should cover the rest of the world too. Ernestrome (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical versus statistical prediction

Hi all. I'm planning to insert a paragraph under "assessment" on clinical and statistical prediction. Something along the lines of that seen here Paul E. Meehl#Clinical versus statistical prediction. Vrie0006 (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the list of journal articles

Lots of red links, unsourced, arguably not very useful to have on the main page. I've reproduced it here. I put the image toward the beginning of the article, when that journal is first introduced.

Clinical psychology journals

Cover of The Psychological Clinic, the first journal of clinical psychology, published in 1907 by Lightner Witmer

The following represents an (incomplete) listing of significant journals in or related to the field of clinical psychology.

See also: a list of empirical journals published by the APA

ABPP specialization list was incomplete

The ABPP specialization list on the main page was incomplete. Here is the original list:

The full list can be found on ABPP's website http://www.abpp.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3285. Missing from the above list are "clinical neuropsychology pediatric subspecialty", "clinical psychology", "cognitive and behavioral psychology", "counseling psychology", "geropsychology", "group psychology", "police and public safety psychology", "rehabilitation psychology".

I would propose either the whole list or no list be included. I vote no list because the whole list is too long and too specialized (e.g., just one organization, only relevant in US), for lack of a better word, for the main clinical psychology page.

I agree that the list isn't necessary. —PermStrump(talk) 17:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of major influences not referenced

No references for this list, plus everyone on the list are in related categories.

Major influences

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diagnostic Impressions Section Misleading

The final paragraph of this section is misleading and should be removed. Clinical psychologists not only diagnose, but are *required* to diagnose in order to treat their patients. It is, in fact, considered unethical for a clinical psychologist to treat a patient without first assigning a diagnosis which is to be treated. For this reason, this information is incorrect. In addition, distinguishing between a diagnosis and a formulation is a false dichotomy, as the clinical formulations that are provided by psychologists include a diagnosis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSukis (talk • contribs) 02:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transpersonal Psychology Section

I noticed that the transpersonal psychology section was not that big, at least when compared to other psychological methods. I was thinking of adding that "transpersonal psychology also focuses on understanding the brain as it goes through shifts in consciousness that are related to transcendence" transcendence being different for each individual of course. Source: Hartelius, G., Krippner, S., & Thouin-Savard, M. I. (2017). Transpersonal and Psychology: An Experiment in Inclusivity and Rigor. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 36(1), iii+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A584329702/AONE?u=birm97026&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=82ef0da5


I just wanted to go through the talk page before I actually edited.

Thank you

Pammul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pammul (talk • contribs) 03:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Clinical_psychology&oldid=1029082906"