Jump to content

Talk:Aubrey de Grey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Aubrey de Grey/Archive 1) (bot
Line 53: Line 53:


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence]]''' has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''[[Talk:Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence#RfC on SENS controversy section|discussion page]]'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you.
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence]]''' has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''[[Talk:Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence#RfC on SENS controversy section|discussion page]]'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you.

== 2005 Criticism and More Recent Positive Comments ==

The article is misleading because there is extensive coverage of the 2005 criticisms but no follow-up on more recent positive comments. [[Brian K. Kennedy]] was a co-author of an MIT Technology Review submission criticizing SENS, but in a 2015 interview he was supportive of Aubrey's work and stated there was "convergence" <ref>https://mendelspod.com/podcasts/brian-kennedy-and-aubrey-de-grey-their-converging-approaches-aging-research timestamp=03:46</ref>. [[S. Jay Olshansky]] was a co-author of the EMBO Reports criticism, but in a 2021 interview he was supportive of Aubrey's research <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDIUCywerf8&t=1269s</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDIUCywerf8&t=140s0</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDIUCywerf8&t=3468s</ref>.

For the article to not be misleading, it should contain more up-to-date information. It is relevant and important that two authors from the 2005 criticisms have publicly made positive comments on Aubrey's research. I would invite a more experienced editor to make suitable changes to the article. Would something like the following be OK? ''Brian K. Kennedy and S. Jay Olshansky have made more positive comments about De Grey's research since their 2005 criticisms.'' (followed by references I've included) If not, please suggest what would be a suitable addition.

Apologies for any newcomer mistakes!
[[Special:Contributions/65.50.153.6|65.50.153.6]] ([[User talk:65.50.153.6|talk]]) 16:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:41, 11 July 2021

Template:Vital article

Irony

Anonymous user 210.187.136.223, congratulations, your editing tests have worked. Continue such tests, and, under the discretion of Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress, your domain may be blocked. --Nectarflowed 23:57, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I changed the 7 symptoms into a numbered list... Looks clearer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.35.31 (talkcontribs)

Discography?

Hi. Steve Aoki has featured Aubrey de Grey on on musical track. Should a reference to this or discography section be added? Beyond Boundaries (Outro) ft. Aubrey de Grey - Neon Future 1 - Steve Aoki. Cheers. :) Michael Ten (talk) 05:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tell us about it. MaynardClark (talk) 10:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad description of de Grey's unit-distance graph

The Mathematics section consists of this passage:

"On April 8, 2018 de Grey posted a paper to the arXiv explicitly constructing a unit-distance graph which cannot be colored with fewer than 5 colors. The previous lower bound is due to the problem's original proposal in 1950 by Hugo Hadwiger and Edward Nelson. De Grey's graph has 1581-vertices but it has since been reduced to 633 vertices by independent researchers."

It is trivial to find a unit-distance graph that cannot be colored with fewer than 5 colors. E.g., the vertices of a regular 4-simplex in 5-dimensional Euclidean space, such as

{(sqrt(1/2),0,0,0,0), (0,sqrt(1/2),0,0,0), (0,0,sqrt(1/2),0,0), (0,0,0,sqrt(1/2),0), (0,0,0,0,sqrt(1/2))}.

The actual problem is to find a unit-distance graph of points in the plane. This condition is somehow entirely omitted from the description in the article.50.205.142.50 (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cryonics

Is it true that de Grey has signed up with Alcor? The cited article does not mention support the claim made here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topotrivl (talkcontribs) 06:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

2005 Criticism and More Recent Positive Comments

The article is misleading because there is extensive coverage of the 2005 criticisms but no follow-up on more recent positive comments. Brian K. Kennedy was a co-author of an MIT Technology Review submission criticizing SENS, but in a 2015 interview he was supportive of Aubrey's work and stated there was "convergence" [1]. S. Jay Olshansky was a co-author of the EMBO Reports criticism, but in a 2021 interview he was supportive of Aubrey's research [2][3][4].

For the article to not be misleading, it should contain more up-to-date information. It is relevant and important that two authors from the 2005 criticisms have publicly made positive comments on Aubrey's research. I would invite a more experienced editor to make suitable changes to the article. Would something like the following be OK? Brian K. Kennedy and S. Jay Olshansky have made more positive comments about De Grey's research since their 2005 criticisms. (followed by references I've included) If not, please suggest what would be a suitable addition.

Apologies for any newcomer mistakes! 65.50.153.6 (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]