User talk:MYPETCARP

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Topson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

MYPETCARP, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MYPETCARP! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikyup has been accepted

Nikyup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivanka Boteva

The article Ivanka Boteva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable; fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ivanka Boteva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivanka Boteva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivanka Boteva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, Thank you for creating Dink, Plovdiv Province . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Dink), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 10:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Tenses

Hi — I've reviewed a number of your articles recently, and noticed that you have a habit of writing about dead people in the present tense. If someone is no longer with us, it's usually more appropriate to refer to them in the past tense (other than for things like ongoing legacy, eg. "she is best remembered as..."). This is no biggie; it's just that it can take a fair bit of time and effort to change the tense afterwards, whereas when you're first creating the article it's just as easy for you to write in the correct tense as it is in an incorrect one. :) Hope this helps, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papyrus Carlsberg Collection has been accepted

Papyrus Carlsberg Collection, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Toromanova-Hmelik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Toromanova-Hmelik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Toromanova-Hmelik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Urartuvanking (talk) 08:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi I’ve just reviewed Evgenia Mars. Thanks very much for creating this, and if you ever need any help please leave a message on my talk page. Mccapra (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! MYPETCARP (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diversity in policing has been accepted

Diversity in policing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gold Town Casino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gold Town Casino, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 08:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Example suspected covert advertising: Draft:Boxmode, Draft:Cheryl Miller (executive). MER-C 18:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Also likely sock/meatpuppetry with LUCIDLEAL. MER-C 18:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MYPETCARP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I have greatly contributed to many articles. I mainly get the ideas on what to write on from Projects Red and Articles that are on-demand like Women in red. Cheryl Miller was a woman who appeared red on a list and I decided to help out. (Since I write mostly articles about women. As you can see in my articles history.)It is not an advertisement. I will not use Wikipedia for advertising purposes. Please, let me know how to get my account functional again, and thank you for doing a great job. MYPETCARP (talk) 06:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MYPETCARP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I understand the reason for being blocked. I wrote a 3-4 articles concerning CEOs and companies which have an advertorial nature. I promise this will never happen again. The majority of my 60+ contributions and articles are related to women, and geography. (Mainly women in red, project Nevada, and Bulgaria. The places I have lived. I also promise to never open any other accounts and I will always use this account for contributions to Wikipedia. I also understand that I caused damage to Wikipedia, and I will instead continue to write articles like the ones some Wikipedia editors and admins thanked me about. Please, reconsider the block. Thank you and have a nice week. MYPETCARP (talk) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, I understand the reason for being blocked. I wrote a 3-4 articles concerning CEOs and companies which have an advertorial nature. I promise this will never happen again. The majority of my 60+ contributions and articles are related to women, and geography. (Mainly women in red, project Nevada, and Bulgaria. The places I have lived. I also promise to never open any other accounts and I will always use this account for contributions to Wikipedia. I also understand that I caused damage to Wikipedia, and I will instead continue to write articles like the ones some Wikipedia editors and admins thanked me about. Please, reconsider the block. Thank you and have a nice week. [[User:MYPETCARP|MYPETCARP]] ([[User talk:MYPETCARP#top|talk]]) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I understand the reason for being blocked. I wrote a 3-4 articles concerning CEOs and companies which have an advertorial nature. I promise this will never happen again. The majority of my 60+ contributions and articles are related to women, and geography. (Mainly women in red, project Nevada, and Bulgaria. The places I have lived. I also promise to never open any other accounts and I will always use this account for contributions to Wikipedia. I also understand that I caused damage to Wikipedia, and I will instead continue to write articles like the ones some Wikipedia editors and admins thanked me about. Please, reconsider the block. Thank you and have a nice week. [[User:MYPETCARP|MYPETCARP]] ([[User talk:MYPETCARP#top|talk]]) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, I understand the reason for being blocked. I wrote a 3-4 articles concerning CEOs and companies which have an advertorial nature. I promise this will never happen again. The majority of my 60+ contributions and articles are related to women, and geography. (Mainly women in red, project Nevada, and Bulgaria. The places I have lived. I also promise to never open any other accounts and I will always use this account for contributions to Wikipedia. I also understand that I caused damage to Wikipedia, and I will instead continue to write articles like the ones some Wikipedia editors and admins thanked me about. Please, reconsider the block. Thank you and have a nice week. [[User:MYPETCARP|MYPETCARP]] ([[User talk:MYPETCARP#top|talk]]) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You seem to be admitting to sock puppetry. Could you tell us the accounts you have used? PhilKnight (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Yes, The accounts are GurbaLove, and LUCIDLEAL. To be honest, I didn't know that was a violation of Wikipedia's Terms. I know this isn't an excuse. Most of the articles are about Bulgaria, Nevada, and Women in Red. Could you, please, unblock this account and track the articles I write? You wouldn't regret my contributions, I promise.