User talk:Serols

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your work in fighting vandalism. Shinyeditbonjour. 17:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for protecting my user page. Hatchens (talk) 04:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Brunei page must be protected

The Brunei National Football team page is constantly being vandalised I would appreciate if you or a colleague could protect it or semi-protect it Thank you here is a link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunei_national_football_team.

Hello, I will take care. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I often see you around combating vandalism. This is to let you know that your work is much appreciated. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 15:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		thanks for keeping wiki factual and vandal-free! Alibino (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		Thank you for your very quick reverts from vandalism. Without you Wikipedia would not be what it is supposed to be. Your fight against vandalism is very important and your work is really wonderful. Thanks again! RacoonyRE Message meContributions 19:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You literally inspired me to become an active contributor here Firestar464 (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	We deleted this article together :) Justiyaya (talk) 08:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Since you done very well on a rollbacker. I will give you a barnstar award. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 15:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Pf tek is unverified sources and needs to be removed

The pf tek has no certified verified sources and except self promotion of his personal website and post on the shroomery promoting him and fungi fun also which is a personal website for selling spores and needs to be removed Innoculatethewest (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Innoculatethewest, please use the article's talk page. --Serols (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Speedy reverts, thanks Serols. Justiyaya (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Great job on the reverts

You're doing an impressive job reverting vandalism! Thank you! Stickymatch 18:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for defeating that Kiev Guy... You'd probably agree Kyiv is the most popular spelling? Kyiv Guy (talk) 06:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Petroccelli

Is your wrong intepretation that are no constructive, is very important, the real name is Vincenzo Pasquale Angelo Petroccell (with doubble "c"), next in a wrong way he was called Petrocelli. Check it and correct please. https://www.google.it/books/edition/L_Accademia_di_belle_arti_di_Napoli_1752/HrVtAAAAIAAJ?hl=it&gbpv=1&bsq=%22Vincenzo+Petroccelli%22&dq=%22Vincenzo+Petroccelli%22&printsec=frontcover} correct these, all the other version are wrong. --151.36.215.167 (talk) 08:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, please note the article name, it is binding. --Serols (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop it

Whenever you are at Special:RecentChanges there is no no spam left for me :(. Great job mate! Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 12:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

I've wanted to say the same thing before now!!! Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Echinopsis pachanoi

This is the source: http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:88444-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.68.130.122 (talk) 15:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, not on my talk page, but in the article. --Serols (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Reverting my edit

Hello i am gokul from mutharasanallur. I was edit temple name in mutharsanallur article but you reverted it. That temple is also in the mutharasanallur village and that temple where also 200+ years old temple. So edit our temple name in that articleKaikudi sgr (talk) 10:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Kaikudi sgr, please use reliable sources. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes I will show the source for that temple. Kaikudi sgr (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Not bad. Not bad at all. Littlecat456💬(.log) 12:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I'm new, why is that a vandalism? I was just saying hello.

Hello, please stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

B SAD

Please verify the talk page of this article to check the information about this process.Jafdfm (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

MALAT1 Removal

Hi Serol. Would it be okay if you returned my link on the MALAT1 gene page? This gene frequently occurs during analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data and thought it might be a useful for bioinformaticians who are interested in this gene, hence searching it on Wikipedia, to be connected to the link I shared pertaining to it's relevancy. Thanks!

Hello, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Reverting my edit

Hello. Why have you reverted my edit here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_grand_soups&diff=1026474435&oldid=1026474122?

Hello, you can read it here -> A CONSENSUS IS BEING MADE ON THE TALK PAGE ON THE SUBJECT OF ORIGIN; PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THIS. --Serols (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Please pay more attention to the history when reverting changes! Here is a reversion from 10 of April which changed the original consensus - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_grand_soups&diff=1016965445&oldid=1009612556 What I did - just reverted to the consensus version.

Hello, please see the whole history, there has long been a dispute about the origin. Please use the talk page until consensus is found. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!

You are awesome
I keep seeing you beat me to it
Keep it up mate

Skelly, a real skeleton 🦴 (talk to me!) 18:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Why was my edit reverted

Hi, I wonder why my contribution was reverted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UEFA_Euro_2020&oldid=prev&diff=1026471851 The source is an official website of the Dutch Football Association. thanks for your answer in advance.

Hello Mworkel, please use upper and lower case. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Confused

Please could you let me know how talking about an important invention in 3d printing is promotional? No mention of a company has been stated, a relevant citation has been added, what is the issue? Why can't LCD printing be discussed in 3d? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tharliarmy (talk • contribs) 15:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Tharliarmy, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Serols, I linked to a leading publication source in 3d printing, not the actual inventors of the machine?? Not sure how this is promotional, but hey...

Hello Tharliarmy, no links in the flow text. What you have done is link spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

TNARS/Log College and Seminary

You reverted all my edits on The North American Reformed Seminary page, claiming they were vandalism. Every link on the page currently brings up a 404 error and the college changed their name, which you can easily find on their website.

Hello, please note Use commonly recognizable names, and without a relevant source it is vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Carposina bullata

Hello, I'm Tonton Bernardo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Carposina bullata —because it destructive and may be considered as vandalism. Thanks. I'm so tired (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello I'm so tired, can you read -> use upper and lower case? --Serols (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I copy & paste, if you consider necessary or are unable to read it: do it yourself !

Stop spamming now, it's not constructive" ! I'm so tired (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello I'm so tired, is it still possible? You start an edit war, although I pointed out to you, that you have to use upper and lower case and the spelling is not ok? And your excuse is I copy & paste? Your behavior is not acceptable, likewise your choice of words. Since you are not able, I change your mistake. --Serols (talk) 10:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Ty for your efforts in anti-vandalism and WP in general! Necctaylor (chat) 15:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry for reverting your edit, I was using an anti-vandalism tool that updated the page without me noticing. I was trying to revert vandalism. I immediately undid my rollback. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply)Template:Z181 12:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello User:Qwerfjkl, please be careful with what you do. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Vani Jairam

Hello Serols. Thanks for letting me know about your reversion of my recent edits to Vani Jairam. Could you be more specific as to which parts of the edits you found not constructive? I based each of the edits on the Wikipedia policies, the Manual of Style and the guidance for the corresponding templates used, although I did change the infobox type from {{infobox musical artist}} with an embedded {{infobox person}} to just to {{infobox person}} because none of the parameters used were unique to {{infobox musical artist}}. If some of the parameters that are unique to {{infobox musical artist}} were being used (e.g., |genre=, |instrument=, |associated_acts=, |label=, etc.), I would have left it as it was. I think it is cleaner without the dual/infobox types, but I recognize that not everyone may agree with that; although I'm not sure calling it not constructive is entirely fair (AGF). Anyway, I invite you to let me better understand your concerns. If I made a mistake, I want to learn from it and correct for the future. Thank you. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello 108.56.139.120, see here -> born 19045. You can revert my edit, but you must change the date. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah. I see. A typo. I'll fix it. Thanks for letting me know. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Chernobyl

Greetings Serlos, Writing about recent changes to Chernobyl page, that you descrided as "did not appear constructive", willing to say that I wanted to correct wrong name of town, which seems to constructive. BR, MortyHQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by MortyHQ (talk • contribs) 17:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello MortyHQ, my revert was ok -> Chernobyl and not Chornobyl. --Serols (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Serols According to what you can say that it is ok? Try looking at google maps to check the correct name. Later you can check the official Romanization of Ukrainian. BR, MortyHQ (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello MortyHQ, please note, this is Wikipedia.en -> Chernobyl, discussion is over. --Serols (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry about the warning. I thought you were part of the edit war. I see you were not. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello CambridgeBayWeather, no problem, can happen and you noticed it yourself. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for taking that so well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		Wonderful work on anonymous IP vandals. Way to go! Benevolent human (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Quadratic reciprocity

What's wrong with adding a link to arXiv pdf of the proof in the quadratic reciprocity article? (Making it more accessible for a general reader?)

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. --Serols (talk) 12:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Would this be acceptable: "...(for the text of the proof, see)."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.33.2.160 (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, this the text of the proof, see is considered spam. --Serols (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Lost Decade (Japan)

I’m sorry about the inadvertent rollback on this entry! Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Larry Hockett, no problem, can happen. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Curious question

This certainly isn't a critique or anything like that, but just out of curiosity, why did you decide to skip the user page? Benevolent human (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Benevolent human, why should I have one? The vandalism on my talk page is enough for me, at least I notice it. --Serols (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Good point, makes sense! I think you're right, there's really no need. Benevolent human (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Need a help

Hi Serols , hope you doing well. Please I need a help to report a person which starts really to bother me with its vandalism and reverting all my edittings with some misrespect in comments, just because the first time I added some information on his tribe. Can you please help me how to report a user ?

Thanks in advance

Qazi Muhammad Isa

If an individual uses uncommon spelling for their name, and is commonly regocnised as such, then it is ok to use such spelling.Monatowfik (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Monatowfik, please note the rules Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, that is binding. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean binding? Why do you want to disrespect a deceased person by imposing your version of how you feel his name is spelled?

Look at the postage stamp issued in his honour.

https://i2.wp.com/www.thedesignwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Sketched-Postal-Stamps-Pioneers-of-Freedom-By-Saeed-Akhtar-04.jpg?w=575&ssl=1

https://www.thedesignwork.com/pencil-sketches-postage-stamps-by-saeed-akhtar/

Hello Monatowfik, please accept the rules of Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello User talk:Serols, what rules of Wikipedia say that you get to decide how a person's name is spelled? Instead of threatening with revoking my editing privileges, kindly stop vandalising the page unless you have a solid reason for imposing why a particular name should be spelled differently from its official spelling. Monatowfik (talk) 12:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Monatowfik, the article name is binding, see the link. --Serols (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry which link are you asking me to see? I do not see any link you have shared. I have shared with you a link to the commemorative stamp issued for the gentleman in question. I can fix the article name if that is OK with you. If it means so much to you to spell this person's name incorrectly that you are willing to threaten me, then I will just back off. Spelling a dead person's name properly is not so important to me that I would want to be threatened by strangers Monatowfik (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Monatowfik, Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service‎

Thanks for the revert. I would appreciate you keeping an eye on the article for a while as (along with other UK fire and rescue articles) it tends to attract single-purpose COI and / or IP editors who seem hell-bent on filling it with unsourced trivia and original research. As someone who is passionate about removing OR from Wikipedia I defend articles, but I do obviously want to stay within the rules and not inadvertently trip 3RR. Hence the request for you to keep watch if you don't mind. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello 10mmsocket, I pay attention too. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Appreciated. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your attention to Talk:Suffolk Fire and Rescue Service and the recent article history would be welcomed. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Revert on Sorbet

Hello,

I was in the middle of performing a WP:SPLIT on Sorbet to Sherbet (frozen dessert). I don't consider this a WP:BOLD edit. Consensus was reached in the talk page years ago that these should be split. Yes, there was a merge back in 2007, and since then, nearly a decade of comments left by both registered and unregistered users have followed expression confusion as to why Wikipedia does not have any sort of page on sherbet as a frozen dessert. I did not find any opposition on any of the pages related to the term "sherbet" to this. My understanding from the talk page is that the merge of Sherbet (US) to Sorbet has caused more confusion than clarity. I was left doubly confused after noticing Sherbet no longer mentions a frozen dessert after an edit by an anonymous user in May 2021.

If you would like to discuss this further, let's continue this discussion on Talk:Sorbet so information isn't lost.

CherryT~enwiki (talk) 11:49, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello CherryT~enwiki, please read the talk page, before you change something -> see here. --Serols (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Serols: I'd advise you also read the talk page before you change something, specifically the thread on "Sherbert (the unique US diary product) needs its own page" [[1]]. The decision you linked was made in 2007. And since then, there's been an entire discourse over a decade in favor of undoing that merge. I'll admit I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's policies, so if there is some process I'm missing for reversing that merge decision, please let me know. My understanding from reading this talk page is that the community thinks these two pages should be split. Am I missing something? CherryT~enwiki (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello CherryT~enwiki, the name Sorbet is used globally and please note also Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Results

We can't spread misinformation - we do not yet have results in NYC races. Only partial results. --2603:7000:2143:8500:98A6:314:E179:7800 (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello 2603:7000:2143:8500:98A6:314:E179:7800, see your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Is Woody Harrelson Dead?

My mom asked me to check online to see if Woody Harrelson was dead and it scared the hell out of me. Is he dead? I hope not. Sasa888 (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Sasa888, you log on to Wikipedia just to ask me that? Everything ok with you? --Serols (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Sabel Starr

You reverted an inappropriate IP edit concerning her non-notable sister Corel Shields. The IP went to the Help Desk to complain and mentioned that Intelius could confirm that Shields was born in 1955 not 1959. I would not use Intelius or other public records sources as a reference in a Wikipedia article but I think it is a useful tool for investigating BLP concerns. Intelius says that she is 65 years old which is consistent with the IP's claim and therefore she was probably not born in 1959 and was much older than the claimed age of 13 at the time of an alleged 1973 sexual encounter with Iggy Pop. There is obviously a big difference between a rock star having sex with a 13 year old as opposed to a 17 or 18 year old, and there are major BLP concerns since both are still alive. Accordingly, I have removed all mention of Corel Shields from her sister's biography. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Cullen³²⁸, thank you very much for your explanation. Wish you a nice day --Serols (talk) 13:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Sara Ramirez

So I updated the infobox image of Sara Ramirez because 1) having an outdated image of a person on their wikipage is annoying and 2) I know when I look back at photos of me from before my gender identity change I feel dysphoric and maybe that's not the case for Sara, we may never know, but I think the main photos on information pages should reflect their current appearance.

You reverted this change claiming it "did not appear constructive" but keeping images of people up to date is good practice and it seems to me like you only reverted this change due bigotry.

Maybe an updated image isn't as important as listing everything they've been in and new information about the person in question, but not changing it seems lazy at best and offensive at worst. Maybe not all images need to be updated if the person looks basically the same but when there's a huge difference in appearance due to age or gender etc it's important.

Sara Ramirez's page isn't the only one that needs to be updated. Elliot Page's Page is another and there's probably a lot more that I haven't seen. TransDragon (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello TransDragon, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. To change the picture is ok, but you also changed the spelling of the name. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Since I clearly don't know much about editing Wikipedia maybe you could change the image for me? The image I used is called MAD-ramirez-501i.jpg It's still in my uploads so I assume that means it's acceptable to use? I don't know. TransDragon (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello TransDragon, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I am Impressed of how quickly you fight Vandalism as you did on Nick DiGiovanni. Great Job! Brascoian (talk to me) 11:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad ibn abd al wahab

Hey why did you change my edit Khan12888 (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Khan12888, you know why. Please stop with vandalism, you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry bro i am experimenting and I am not vanadilizing, I am new and can you let me from where you are kind of you Khan12888 (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Khan12888, please stop it. --Serols (talk) 08:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

I got it but you don't tell me from where you are are you muslim? Khan12888 (talk) 08:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion is over. --Serols (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hmm Khan12888 (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome template

Will you give me one of those welcome templates? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GBFEE (talk • contribs) 17:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello GBFEE, I sent you. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

slow-motion edit war continues at Andrea Radrizzani

Hi, I see you were once involved in the article on Andrea Radrizzani, which was protected at some time (were you the protecting admin?). Its history is just a huge string of edits and reverts by a handful of IPs adding and removing a reference to U.S Salernitana. The current warring parties are [2001:b07:6461:5805:9daf:f435:c567:7828] and [82.49.175.253]. I wonder whether this page needs protection again? Elemimele (talk) 12:24, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Elemimele, I did not protect them, only reported them to protect them. I have reported an article again - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Sorry to have made you extra work; I am still rather new and didn't think of putting the request at that page myself! Elemimele (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Elemimele, no problem, I was happy to do that. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I've lost count of how many times I've seen your name on my watchlist with regards to fighting vandalism. Thank you for all your hard work in this area. Nice one! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Question

As to this -- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United%20Nations%20Office%20for%20Partnerships&diff=1032728206

Can you please explain the reason for your revert? --2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, why did you delete whole sections? --Serols (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. It has been uncited for a long time. Over half a decade. Tagged for over a year - as I very clearly stated in my edit summaries. There is no special protection from deletion an editor receives, by adding a whole section of uncited material - rather than just half a section. And tagged for that malady. Why do you restore uncited material without RS refs? Isn't there a rule against it?

Can you please explain the reason for your revert?2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Why do you delete it without specifying the source. Please use the talk page beforehand. --Serols (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Specifying what source? What do you mean? 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 08:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, a source that justifies the deletion, or use the talk page. --Serols (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

• There is no rule that talk page discussion is required first, especially for uncited for half a decade, tagged for a decade, material. I supplied three proper edit summaries - that is what is called for. Nothing more.

There is however a rule that applies directly to what you did, which is not OK. You are not supposed to re-add the uncited text once challenged and deleted, without you shouldering your burden of providing the supporting RS refs. I would refer you to wp:burden. Which states:

"All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who ... restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution ... The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article... Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source."

That's the main issue, and quite clear. I might add - you used tools, which is really not cricket, in making this mistake. And further - you failed to provide (not that there was one, I guess) a legitimate edit summary for your edit. I would also note that I asked you a question twice above, and you only answered with questions - Can you please explain the reason, per wp rules, for your revert? 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, the sections that you have deleted are not wrong, it is just that no corresponding sources have been stored. The right way would have been to point this out on the talk page.

Example -> (see General Assembly resolution 60/1) - 1 and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 2. The sections were never questioned, only marked that the sources were missing. You are welcome to edit that accordingly and everything is ok. Is that cleared up? --Serols (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry. You are wrong. I left a proper edit summary. Material was tagged. It was deleted properly - in addition to the tag, I question and delete the material. You restored it. Without sources. Clearly failing your obligation under wp:burden. I will therefore restore the deletion.2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 17:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

User:Mean as custard may have thoughts on this thread. 2603:7000:2143:8500:F97E:459A:7CB2:D95 (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, that is so is not correct and falsified. Writing d per year old tags in the comment line is not an acceptable edit summary. The quality templates were set in order to motivate users to insert the missing sources and not to delete whole sections, this is destructive. I gave you two examples, which I then inserted in a section that you deleted. Maybe you will think about this in the future before you start deleting thousands of kb again. --Serols (talk) 07:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

barnstar!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		cheers for the slightly speedier vandal reversion!   melecie   t 08:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Sayaun Thunga Phulka

Not vandalism. See MOS:TITLE, MOS:FLAG, MOS:COLOR, WP:OVERLINK, MOS:PRONUNCIATION. 134.195.198.252 (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names and use sources, you risk to block. --Serols (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Serols, it looks like this might be getting a bit heated. To avoid an edit war it might be a good idea to step back and discuss things on the relevant talk page or pages, and maybe get a WP:Third opinion if you can't agree. You might also be able to informally ask for help from editors experienced in the subject area, such as prior editors of the page or participants in relevant WikiProjects such as WP:WikiProject Nepal, WP:WikiProject Music, or WP:WikiProject Songs.

As a copyeditor I have a few thoughts related to the WP:Manual of Style:

• I can attest that "Shreeman Gambhir" should be in double quotation marks rather than italics following MOS:TITLE for titles of songs, e.g. "The Star-Spangled Banner".
• Nepal seems to commonly use DMY dates and had associations with the British Empire, so it's possible DMY dates would be better per MOS:DATETIES.

I unfortunately am not familiar with the other matters. I'm not really an expert on Wikipedia policies and guidelines either; I'm mostly just summarizing WP:Dispute Resolution. I hope you can settle it peacefully. – Anon423 (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

I just realized you have a ton of experience. No insult was intended by linking Wikipedia basics for reference. Maybe it'll help the other editor. – Anon423 (talk) 23:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Anon423, I don't know what you want from me. The article name is Sayaun Thunga Phulka and not Sayaũ Thuṅgā Phūlkā. Hence my reference to the Wikipedia rule -> Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Something else was not objectionable. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

You don't even read what I added, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU???

You don't even read what I added, WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??? I made a lot of great work on chen yifa

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for continuously stopping so much vandalism! Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Tony Slydini

Hello, I am MagicianLives291. I have tried to change the birth date of Tony Slydini from 1901 to 1900. See video by Bill Wisch located here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujHm0hNYAD0&ab_channel=BillWisch It clearly shows the birth year is wrong. He was 90 years old when he died, not 89 as the article states. Also, Slydini was buried in Union, NJ not Orange, NJ as stated. This is explained in Bill's description of his Youtube video at Slydini's crypt.

It reads: Tony Slydini was more than a mentor and teacher to me; he was also my good friend. Upon learning that Slydini is featured on the cover of the August 2021 issue of Genii, I thought it would be a great time to visit Slydini's final resting place and make a video paying tribute to him. Apparently not many people know where his final resting place is as the burial ceremony was very private and only a few magicians attended, including Artie Miller and Gene Matsuura.

If you would like to pay your respects to Slydini in person, his final resting place is located at: Hollywood Memorial Park and Cemetery 1500 Stuyvesant Ave. Union, NJ 07083 Mausoleum of the Good Shepherd D Chapel-Unit B-Row 3 908-688-4300

Please revert changes back or advise on how to proceed to update Slydini's wikipedia article to state his true birth year, burial location and age upon death. Thank you.

Hello MagicianLives291, please use reliable sources, YouTube does not belong to it. In the Google search is the birth year 1901. --Serols (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

I have now updated references with the Genii Forum.... there is no better source. This includes a PHOTO OF THE GRAVESITE. This should NOT be changed back.... I have provided undeniable proof that Slydini was born in 1900 NOT 1901. Thank you. Genii forum post located here: (WITH PHOTO OF GRAVESITE): https://forums.geniimagazine.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=53599

Hello MagicianLives291, this source is ok. --Serols (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

These things happen

Not a problem; thanks for fixing it. Yappy2bhere (talk) 21:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Venedykt Aleksiychuk

Even though official Church communications will often transliterate the bishop's name from Ukrainian (i.e. "Venedykt") , his eparchy's offical style is to translate his name into English (i.e. "Benedict"), he also self-signs official documents with the "Benedict" nomenclature . I think the Wiki should reflect his personal style and his eparchy's style. julianhayda (talk) 4 August July 2021

Hello julianhayda, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

hello i'm </MrDDBOI>

thanks for you help and i hope many should procces more with guide on via any desk mMrDDBOI (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You are at the forefront of keeping Wikipedia vandalism free, Good luck 😊 ~ Itsskv08 (Talk) 14:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Consultation

What did I do now? Please explain to me. I don't get your point. Philippine 454 Papa (talk) 07:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Philippine 454 Papa, article name is Honcho and you wrote image caption Bosx1ne. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh okay. But that was his previous name. Anyway, this is noted. Thanks! Philippine 454 Papa (talk) 07:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Delete Reza Abbaszadeh

Sir, I recently join Simple English wikipedia. Where I found Reza Abbaszadeh. Then I came to english Wikipedia. I do research for an hour and found he write huge amount of wrong info and submitted paid news as he want. Beside some news media I found he donated 1 million dollar.(https://www.vanguardngr.com/2021/07/reza-abbaszadeh-donates-1-million-to-fight-against-covid-19/) how could he do having net asset of 12 Million dollar. Again it also be check in world Millionaire list and Abbaszadeh University (https://g.co/kgs/KqfUmR) where you can see a University map location have only 11 reviews in past 11 month ago all are same time. Even he uses US number for German Located University. Even the University has no website also.

For spreading this false he targetted the indian and nigerian paid news agency and some pr distribution. Like he feautured in forbesIndia.com but not in Forbes.com.

So please check and delete this false news

Hello, whith other such edits you risk your account 1 2. --Serols (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The Virginia Giuffre Article

Reference your comment upon my page, there is nothing controversial about including original comments by Virgini Giuffre which come from a reliable source known as courthousenews and indeed from the original court documents. You also do to threaten an individual with a ban for including material which you do not happen to like.

Hello, please use upper and lower case. --Serols (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for stopping vandals, and warning users for hours, you deserve this. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 13:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

what is your problem ????

what is your problem ???? 1) Nusret is not Turkish. 2) a photo of a Kurdish dagger, the so-called ottoman knife. BERKİYA (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello BERKİYA , please stop with vandalism. With edits like this you risk your account. --Serols (talk) 15:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

What is your problem ???????????????????? BERKİYA (talk) 16:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Zoruna gitti heralde artık!!!!!

Sen git gırtlak müziği dinle seni aşar buralar , K.O.Ç BERKİYA (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)