Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
YiFeiBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Archived request for Tokyo Babylon
m Kendari: added "Working" tag
Line 49: Line 49:
===[[Kendari]]===
===[[Kendari]]===
I have expanded it a lot, so I would like to see it clean. Thanks a lot [[User:Nyanardsan|Nyanardsan]] ([[User talk:Nyanardsan|talk]]) 06:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I have expanded it a lot, so I would like to see it clean. Thanks a lot [[User:Nyanardsan|Nyanardsan]] ([[User talk:Nyanardsan|talk]]) 06:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{Working}} [[User:Twofingered Typist|Twofingered Typist]] ([[User talk:Twofingered Typist|talk]]) 20:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)


===[[Arthur Phillip]]===
===[[Arthur Phillip]]===

Revision as of 20:56, 17 November 2021

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


October 2021

For GA (GAN). —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently expanded article. For a GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Working ItsMackie (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For upcoming FA (FAC). Wingwatchers (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poentional FAC in the near future; former featured article. Wingwatchers (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a future GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 01:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A potential FAC (I have a few other rods in the fire beforehand); would appreciate a critical eye on tenses used as well, since I'm not 100% the best way to describe a piece of media that doesn't properly exist. Thanks! 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ 01:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small recently created article.Tintor2 (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enragedmuffins has not yet edited this article. I shall ask the editor's intentions on his/her talk page. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 07:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's been no activity from the accepting editor so I've struck the acceptance. This request is now open to anyone. Baffle☿gab 00:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the article deserves a nice copy edit. Thanks. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC) (Left note with Requestor)[reply]

Requesting copy-edit of this article by an experienced copy-editor for a possible FAC. It recently passed its GA as well as A-class nomination. Any extra suggestion are also welcome! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded it a lot, so I would like to see it clean. Thanks a lot Nyanardsan (talk) 06:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently edited this article I’d like a copy edit before I try for a GAN Knightmare 3112 (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a FAC -- thank you! K.e.coffman (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am submitting the Jean Ross article for a copy-edit. The prose is somewhat voluminous and ragged in parts. I've worked extensively on the article during the past several years, and I plan to submit it as a Good Article Nominee (GAN) in the near future. — Flask (talk) 20:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded article of mine that I'd like copy-edited for GAN in the future MWright96 (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For GA Status (GAN). TrangaBellam (talk) 07:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to do a GA-R for you, in return. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For GA Status (GAN). TrangaBellam (talk) 07:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to do a GA-R for you, in return. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I created the "Queer analysis" section back in July, and for a few weeks since late September, I have been expanding it. While I still believe the section can be expanded further and already have some sources to look into, I'd like to take a break and have someone else look through the section and how it can be improved. Such as tense and grammar, for example. Might split it off into its own article, if it ends up becoming too big. PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a FAC. Thanks in advance! Link20XX (talk) 23:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would like a clean up from an editor before update to B status. Lots of information to dig for, so I probably neglect the grammar, etc even more than usual. Cake (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. Artem.G (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Baffle☿gab 22:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. Yeepsi (talk) 20:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

copy edit for GA (GAN). Amir Ghandi (talk) 06:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting for its tense, flow and grammar. Help would be appreciated! OceanHok (talk) 07:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-native here. I made every effort to make the prose readable for this recently created article. However, there are certain parts/sections/phrases that will perhaps require copy editing for clarity/grammar etc, which I was unable to do. Please help. Mosesheron II (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article I created which was heavily edited a few days ago, and expanded by me as well after the rappers death. Could possibly need some c/e.BabbaQ (talk) 22:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently archived at FAC, where the only reviewer to comment was concerned that the quality of the prose was not up to FA standard. Thanks! BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs some basic copyediting, mostly for grammar and readability. Possible future GAN — CuriousGolden (T·C) 17:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Needs improvement in readability and basic copy editing. Will nominate for GA — curiousGolden call me maybe? 20:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For GA (GAN). —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page started off as an article, and has been changed into a list and massively expanded. I am looking to take this list through the A-Class review (ACN) process and then on to be a FLC. I would greatly appreciate anyone who can give the text the once over to bring it up to snuff.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to take this to FAC and the article needs a fresh eye to catch potential prose issues. Thank you very much, Ippantekina (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

About 1100 words on a limited-series WWII time-travel spy thriller comic book. No plans to promote it but would appreciate someone giving it a copy edit. Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 00:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting a request for this early. I'll be finishing it sometime this week (moving from my sandbox). I'll post here when it's finished. – zmbro (talk) 13:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a potential GAN. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a future GAN. NW1223(Howl at me/My hunts) 00:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GOCE! I would appreciate a copy edit on this article. Ideally it will be submitted for a GAN. Thank you for your time and efforts. Kbabej (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently rewrote article, am requesting copyedit as I would be sending this article for a PR. R22-3877 (talk) 06:50, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to improve this article (currently a GA) in terms of grammar fixes and identification of potentially unclear prose before Milhist ACN. Thanks Tomobe03 (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. Yeepsi (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently translated this article from Vietnamese. I think it needs to be reviewed and copyedited. I also plan to nominate this article for good article at some point in the future. Thank you. Ltn12345 (talk) 14:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to improve this article in terms of grammar fixes and identification of potentially unclear prose before GAN and/or Milhist ACN. Cheers. Tomobe03 (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Usually I would be able to fix these types of pages but I need somebody else better to do it. The issues:

  • The citations are inappropriate
  • The article is low-quality
  • It has dumb and irrelevant examples

Pink Saffron (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requester apparently has not made any edits to the article. GOCE can help make text more readable, but citations that fail to support the text, or are otherwise inappropriate, should be flagged with appropriate templates, such as Template:Failed verification. The irrelevancy of the examples should be addressed by subject-matter editors. The article talk page is the place to detail what is lacking. Dhtwiki (talk) 09:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Get your ass to this article. Get your ass to this article. Get your ass to this article." Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential GAN. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently rewrote this article, like a copy edit for a CCN. Knightmare 3112 (talk) 08:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Next up in the series of British brigades, is the list dedicated to the various special service brigades. The intent is to move this through the A-Class and the Featured List review processes. Would an editor be able to give this article the once over, with that goal in mind?EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected a number of issues raised on the page, but would appreciate the GOCE going through this (again, sorry!) to see if I have missed anything. Thanks! —AFreshStart (talk) 00:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still not if I wanna make it GA but it's kinda big so the prose needs to be checked.Tintor2 (talk) 11:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this famous address by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The article passed its GA nomination. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]