User talk:Frankystein3: Difference between revisions
→June 2022: Continued disruptive editing Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Frankystein3 (talk | contribs) →June 2022: Reply |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
To cite a source in support of your personal opinion, representing as saying something it does not say, is [[WP: disruptive|a serious violation]] of Wikipedia principles. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman|John Maynard Friedman]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman|talk]]) 07:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC) |
To cite a source in support of your personal opinion, representing as saying something it does not say, is [[WP: disruptive|a serious violation]] of Wikipedia principles. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman|John Maynard Friedman]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman|talk]]) 07:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
:It DOES say what I said. The only difference is that my quote is a general observation after reviewing lengthily the source, whereas the direct link to the source itself merely shows ONE EXAMPLE of the point I'm making. But very well, I'll edit it accordingly, and I expect not to be threatened for *DEMONSTRABLY* writing the truth. [[User:Frankystein3|Frankystein3]] ([[User talk:Frankystein3#top|talk]]) 13:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:19, 6 June 2022
Hello, I'm Joppa Chong. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. You really should reconsider and change your editing behaviour. --Joppa Chong (talk) 15:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to International military intervention against ISIL has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: International military intervention against ISIL was changed by Frankystein3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8929 on 2018-09-16T18:40:36+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to List of totalitarian regimes while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of totalitarian regimes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Don't shout in edit summaries. I removed your content because it was not sourced. When you restored it, you added new sources. You should just say 'now sourced' not compound your initial error by being rude. DrKay (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
This iS to your recent disruptive editing on the article List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll, where you have erased multiple sourced information and added un-sourced contents based purely on your personal judgement. All your edits have been reverted. Also you are suspected of using multi-accounts which can result in permanent ban User talk:Jaymaniyar, check Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Next time if you cause such disruptive edits you will be reported and may be banned from editing. Dilbaggg (talk) 07:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of genocides by death toll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Persistent disruptive editing, removal of sourced information and adding unsourced and unreliable contents at List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll. Also note, the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic death toll is not part of WW1 death toll, pandemics are natural disasters, death tolls here are for those killed in action, if you include pandemic, then the Black Death pandemic can be addeed to the Mongol Conquests which would bring death toll above 200 million. Pandemics are never considered part of war death, no WP:RS. This is however not the reason you are warned for, you have removed sourced information and added unsourced, unreliable contents which is vandalism and next time you mat be reported and blocked. Dilbaggg (talk) 12:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
June 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Criticism of the Quran, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is in addition to your similar editing on Criticism of Islam, which presented WP:NPOV issues in terms of the introduction of less than neutral subtitles. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Criticism of Mohammed, you may be blocked from editing.
To cite a source in support of your personal opinion, representing as saying something it does not say, is a serious violation of Wikipedia principles. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- It DOES say what I said. The only difference is that my quote is a general observation after reviewing lengthily the source, whereas the direct link to the source itself merely shows ONE EXAMPLE of the point I'm making. But very well, I'll edit it accordingly, and I expect not to be threatened for *DEMONSTRABLY* writing the truth. Frankystein3 (talk) 13:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)