Jump to content

Talk:John Money: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Tag: Reverted
Line 35: Line 35:
: IP 73: this is the wrong venue for such questions. Please refer your questions to the [[WP:Reference desk]] instead. This page is for discussion of ways to improve the article. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
: IP 73: this is the wrong venue for such questions. Please refer your questions to the [[WP:Reference desk]] instead. This page is for discussion of ways to improve the article. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


== John Money was a peadophile ==
== John Money was a peadophile == (spelling correction needed either "ae" [UK] or "e" [US] but not "ea")


He was a horrific evil man. Please state the horrific facts about his abuse in the opening paragraph as you do for Jimmy Saville. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C|2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C|talk]]) 21:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
He was a horrific evil man. Please state the horrific facts about his abuse in the opening paragraph as you do for Jimmy Saville. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C|2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C|talk]]) 21:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:02, 13 June 2022

Template:Vital article

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John Money. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expand article and controversies?

I think this article could be better expanded to highlight his controversial career and the impact he had on other fields. His representation of cases as successes (when they weren't) had widespread implications in sociology, psychology and women's studies. They were rewritten to argue that, as Time magazine (Jan 8, 1973) reported: ""This dramatic case . . . provides strong support … that conventional patterns of masculine and feminine behavior can be altered. It also casts doubt on the theory that major sex differences, psychological as well as anatomical, are immutably set by the genes at conception." Diamond points out that in 1999 that medical texts and laymens texts still include such ideas. It has also come to my attention that some gender studies departments still use his work as 'evidence' that you can socialize gender and sexual orientation into people and that these bear no link to biology. Ideology comes first apparently. Sxologist (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insofar that there are sources commenting on that, then I'd say that could be added. Crossroads -talk- 19:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"..forcing this child and his brother to simulate sex acts which Money photographed[4] and the adult suicides of both brothers.[4]" -- ... why on Erath this monster and pervert was not sentenced??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.231.140.167 (talk) 07:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP 73: this is the wrong venue for such questions. Please refer your questions to the WP:Reference desk instead. This page is for discussion of ways to improve the article. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== John Money was a peadophile == (spelling correction needed either "ae" [UK] or "e" [US] but not "ea")

He was a horrific evil man. Please state the horrific facts about his abuse in the opening paragraph as you do for Jimmy Saville. 2A00:23C5:D68B:1501:4D01:38E1:9E62:2F8C (talk) 21:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite reliable sources and then will be happy to amend main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.143.179.117 (talk) 07:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources, I've read say he was not one himself but an apologist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.187.90 (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sinister Behavior

John Money mutilated and sexually assaulted people and should not be credited for his insane findings. Him and one other person were monsters and used the children for their own sick gratification. Suggesting anything these people did was informative or pioneering is disgusting. 2603:8001:C03D:FC1F:F0A5:A9B7:F2D8:C628 (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite reliable sources and then will be happy to amend main article. Perhaps the Daily Wire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.143.179.117 (talk) 07:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]