Jump to content

Abu Lu'lu'a: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sources stating that Abu Lulu'a killed Umar are severyly biased. more accurate sources state what I wrote. I also moved the hurmuzan name and link to article earlier on the article since his name was required earlier in the previous paragraph in order to describe the account of Umars death.
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Changed the paragraph describing Sunni accounts of what occured and informed the reader of biases held by those who presented these accounts. Also changed the link to "Anti sunni" to a link to the iranian nationalism wikipedia article. This section of the article is too biased to be acceptable. The festivals are not anti-Sunni; they are nationalistic.
Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
Line 20: Line 20:
'''Abū Luʾluʾa Fīrūz''' ({{lang-ar|أبو لؤلؤة فيروز}}; from {{Text|[[Middle Persian]]: ''Pērōz''}}), also known as '''Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn''' ({{lang-ar|بابا شجاع الدين|label=none}}), was a [[Sasanian Empire|Sassanid Persian]] slave known for having assassinated [[Umar|Umar ibn al-Khattab]] ({{reign|634|644}}), the [[Rashidun|second Islamic caliph]], in November 644.
'''Abū Luʾluʾa Fīrūz''' ({{lang-ar|أبو لؤلؤة فيروز}}; from {{Text|[[Middle Persian]]: ''Pērōz''}}), also known as '''Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn''' ({{lang-ar|بابا شجاع الدين|label=none}}), was a [[Sasanian Empire|Sassanid Persian]] slave known for having assassinated [[Umar|Umar ibn al-Khattab]] ({{reign|634|644}}), the [[Rashidun|second Islamic caliph]], in November 644.


After having been captured in battle during the [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Arab-Muslim conquest of Persia]], Abu Lu'lu'a was brought to [[Medina]], the then-capital of the [[Rashidun Caliphate]], which was normally off-limits to non-[[Arabs|Arab]] captives. However, as a highly skilled craftsman, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed entrance into the city in order to work for the caliph. Some Sunni sources believe that Abu Lu'lu'a asked the caliph to lift a tax imposed upon him by his Arab master, [[Al-Mughira|al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba]]. When Umar refused to lift the tax, Abu Lu'lu'a attacked him while he was leading the congregational prayer in the [[mosque]], stabbing him with a double-bladed dagger and leaving him mortally wounded. However, this specific account of the event is very biased due to the many incentives existing for Sunni scholars/historians to tarnish the reputation of Abu Lulu'a. It is much more likely that Abu Lulu'a participated in some preparatory planning with a man named [[Hurmuzān]], an ex-Sassanid military officer.
After having been captured in battle during the [[Muslim conquest of Persia|Arab-Muslim conquest of Persia]], Abu Lu'lu'a was brought to [[Medina]], the then-capital of the [[Rashidun Caliphate]], which was normally off-limits to non-[[Arabs|Arab]] captives. However, as a highly skilled craftsman, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed entrance into the city in order to work for the caliph. Some Sunni sources believe that Abu Lu'lu'a asked the caliph to lift a tax imposed upon him by his Arab master, [[Al-Mughira|al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba]]. When Umar refused to lift the tax, Abu Lu'lu'a attacked him while he was leading the congregational prayer in the [[mosque]], stabbing him with a double-bladed dagger and leaving him mortally wounded. However, this specific account of the event is very biased due to the many incentives existing for Sunni scholars/historians to tarnish the reputation of Abu Lulu'a. It is much more likely that Abu Lulu'a participated in preparatory planning that was unrelated to the reasons brought up by Sunni sources with a man named [[Hurmuzān]], an ex-Sassanid military officer.


According to historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was either captured and executed in Medina or committed suicide there. In retaliation, [[Ubayd Allah ibn Umar]] (one of Umar's sons) killed Abu Lu'lu'a's daughter; [[Hurmuzān]] and Jufayna, a [[Eastern Christianity|Christian]] man from [[al-Hira]] (Iraq) who worked as a private tutor for a family in Medina.
According to historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was either captured and executed in Medina or committed suicide there. In retaliation, [[Ubayd Allah ibn Umar]] (one of Umar's sons) killed Abu Lu'lu'a's daughter; [[Hurmuzān]] and Jufayna, a [[Eastern Christianity|Christian]] man from [[al-Hira]] (Iraq) who worked as a private tutor for a family in Medina.


However, according to later legends that were first recorded in the [[Safavid Iran|Safavid]] era, the prophet [[Muhammad]]'s cousin and son-in-law [[Ali]] (later revered as the first [[Imamate in Shia doctrine|Shi'ite Imam]]), saved Abu Lu'lu'a from his pursuers and miraculously transported him to the city of [[Kashan]] (Iran), where Abu Lu'lu'a married and lived out the rest of his life. At some point, [[Shrine of Abu Lu'lu'a|a shrine was erected for him there]], which from the 16th century onward became the focus of a yearly [[Anti-Sunnism|anti-Sunni]] festival celebrating Abu Lu'lu'a's assassination of Umar (whom [[Shi'ites]] consider to be the most oppressive early caliph), called [[Omar Koshan]] ({{lit|the killing of Umar}}).
However, according to later legends that were first recorded in the [[Safavid Iran|Safavid]] era, the prophet [[Muhammad]]'s cousin and son-in-law [[Ali]] (later revered as the first [[Imamate in Shia doctrine|Shi'ite Imam]]), saved Abu Lu'lu'a from his pursuers and miraculously transported him to the city of [[Kashan]] (Iran), where Abu Lu'lu'a married and lived out the rest of his life. At some point, [[Shrine of Abu Lu'lu'a|a shrine was erected for him there]], which from the 16th century onward became the focus of a yearly [[Iranian nationalism|nationalistic]] festival celebrating Abu Lu'lu'a's assassination of Umar (whom [[Shi'ites]] consider to be the most oppressive early caliph), called [[Omar Koshan]] ({{lit|the killing of Umar}}).


==Name==
==Name==
Line 33: Line 33:
Very little is known about his life.<ref>{{harvnb|Ishkevari|Nejad|2008}}.</ref> According to some historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was a [[Zoroastrian]] from [[Nahavand]] (Iran), though other reports describe him as a [[Eastern Christianity|Christian]].<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}. Modern authors also take different views: {{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}} merely state that he was a Christian slave, whereas {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 67}} finds the sources claiming he was Christian unreliable. {{harvnb|Ishkevari|Nejad|2008}} mention that according to the {{transliteration|ar|Mujmal al-tawārīkh wa-l-qiṣaṣ}}, an anonymous work written c. 1126 CE, Abu Lu'lu'a came from Fin, a village near [[Kashan]].</ref> A highly skilled [[joiner]] and [[blacksmith]],<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> Abu Lu'lu'a was probably taken captive by his Arab master [[al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba]] in the [[Battle of Nahavand]] (642) and subsequently brought to [[Arabia]], where he may also have converted to Islam.<ref>This is the view of {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 67}}.</ref> Other historical sources report that he was rather taken captive by al-Mughira in the [[Battle of al-Qadisiyya]] (636), or that he was sold to al-Mughira by [[Hurmuzān]], an ex-[[Sassanid]] military officer who had been working for Umar as an adviser after his own capture by the Muslims.<ref>See the sources cited by {{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|pp=108–109}} (cf. also p. 112).</ref> Although [[Medina]] was generally off-limits to the {{transliteration|ar|[[ʿajam]]}} (non-[[Arabs]]) under [[Umar]]'s reign, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed to enter the capital of the [[Rashidun Caliphate|early caliphate]], being sent there by al-Mughira to serve the caliph.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}; cf. {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 64}}.</ref>
Very little is known about his life.<ref>{{harvnb|Ishkevari|Nejad|2008}}.</ref> According to some historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was a [[Zoroastrian]] from [[Nahavand]] (Iran), though other reports describe him as a [[Eastern Christianity|Christian]].<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}. Modern authors also take different views: {{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}} merely state that he was a Christian slave, whereas {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 67}} finds the sources claiming he was Christian unreliable. {{harvnb|Ishkevari|Nejad|2008}} mention that according to the {{transliteration|ar|Mujmal al-tawārīkh wa-l-qiṣaṣ}}, an anonymous work written c. 1126 CE, Abu Lu'lu'a came from Fin, a village near [[Kashan]].</ref> A highly skilled [[joiner]] and [[blacksmith]],<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> Abu Lu'lu'a was probably taken captive by his Arab master [[al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba]] in the [[Battle of Nahavand]] (642) and subsequently brought to [[Arabia]], where he may also have converted to Islam.<ref>This is the view of {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 67}}.</ref> Other historical sources report that he was rather taken captive by al-Mughira in the [[Battle of al-Qadisiyya]] (636), or that he was sold to al-Mughira by [[Hurmuzān]], an ex-[[Sassanid]] military officer who had been working for Umar as an adviser after his own capture by the Muslims.<ref>See the sources cited by {{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|pp=108–109}} (cf. also p. 112).</ref> Although [[Medina]] was generally off-limits to the {{transliteration|ar|[[ʿajam]]}} (non-[[Arabs]]) under [[Umar]]'s reign, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed to enter the capital of the [[Rashidun Caliphate|early caliphate]], being sent there by al-Mughira to serve the caliph.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}; cf. {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75, note 64}}.</ref>


When al-Mughira forced Abu Lu'lu'a to pay a {{transliteration|ar|[[kharāj]]}} tax of two [[dirham]]s a day,<ref>Other sources speak of three dirhams a month; see {{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> Abu Lu'lu'a turned to Umar to protest this tax. However, Umar refused to lift the tax, thus provoking Abu Lu'lu'a's rage.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}; {{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}}. As pointed out by Pellat 2011, other accounts rather maintain that Abu Lu'lu'a's was angry about the caliph's raising a {{transliteration|ar|kharāj}} tax on his master al-Mughira.</ref> Although this is the reason given by most historical accounts for Abu Lu'lu'a's assassination of Umar,<ref>{{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}}.</ref> Umar's harsh policies against non-Arabs are also likely to have played a prominent role.<ref>This is the hypothesis of {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75}}.</ref> One day when Umar was leading the congregational prayer in the [[mosque of Medina]], Abu Lu'lu'a stabbed him with a double-bladed dagger.<ref>{{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}} describes the dagger as "unique", having "two pointed sharp edges, with a handle in the middle".</ref> There are different versions of how this happened: according to one version, he also killed Kulayb ibn al-Bukayr al-Laythi who was behind Umar,<ref>{{The History of al-Tabari | volume = 14 | page = 90}} Cf. {{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}}. See also {{harvnb|Caetani|1905–1926|loc=vol. V, p.}} [https://archive.org/details/annalidellislam05caetuoft/page/216/mode/1up 216].</ref> while in another version he stabbed thirteen people who tried to restrain him.<ref>{{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}}.</ref> According to some accounts, the caliph died on the same day, while other accounts maintain that he died three days later.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> In any case, Umar died of his wounds on Wednesday {{nowrap|26 [[Dhu al-Hijja]]}} of the {{nowrap|[[Hijri calendar|Islamic year]] 23}} ({{nowrap|6 November 644}} according to the [[Gregorian calendar]]).<ref>{{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}}; {{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref>
A multitude of possible reasons existed for Abu Lulu'a to murder Umar. One of the most prominent reasons being that Abu Lulu'a was a Persian and was attempting to get revenge for the conquering of his native lands and the enslavement of the inhabitants of the Sassanid empire. Umar's harsh policies against non-Arabs are also likely to have played a prominent role.<ref>This is the hypothesis of {{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=75}}.</ref> One day when Umar was leading the congregational prayer in the [[mosque of Medina]], Abu Lu'lu'a stabbed him with a double-bladed dagger.<ref>{{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}} describes the dagger as "unique", having "two pointed sharp edges, with a handle in the middle".</ref> There are different versions of how this happened: according to one version, he also killed Kulayb ibn al-Bukayr al-Laythi who was behind Umar,<ref>{{The History of al-Tabari | volume = 14 | page = 90}} Cf. {{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}}. See also {{harvnb|Caetani|1905–1926|loc=vol. V, p.}} [https://archive.org/details/annalidellislam05caetuoft/page/216/mode/1up 216].</ref> while in another version he stabbed thirteen people who tried to restrain him.<ref>{{harvnb|El-Hibri|2010|p=109}}.</ref> According to some accounts, the caliph died on the same day, while other accounts maintain that he died three days later.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> In any case, Umar died of his wounds on Wednesday {{nowrap|26 [[Dhu al-Hijja]]}} of the {{nowrap|[[Hijri calendar|Islamic year]] 23}} ({{nowrap|6 November 644}} according to the [[Gregorian calendar]]).<ref>{{harvnb|Levi Della Vida|Bonner|1960–2007}}; {{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref>


Some historical sources report that Abu Lu'lu'a was taken prisoner and executed for his assassination of Umar, while other sources claim that he committed suicide.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> After Abu Lu'lu'a's death, his daughter was killed by [[Ubayd Allah ibn Umar]], one of Umar's sons. Acting upon the claim of one man (either [[Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf]] or [[Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr]]) that they had been seen conspiring with Abu Lu'lu'a while he was holding the double-bladed dagger, Ubayd Allah also killed Hurmuzān (Umar's Persian military adviser), and Jufayna, a Christian man from [[al-Hira]] (Iraq) who had been taken to Medina to serve as a private tutor to a family in Medina.<ref>{{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=69}} (cf. p. 404, where Madelung refers to him as "Jufayna al-Naṣrānī").</ref> After Ubayd Allah was detained for these murders, he threatened to kill all foreign captives residing in Medina, as well as some others. Although Ubayd Allah may have been encouraged by his sister [[Hafsa bint Umar]] to avenge their father's death, his murder of Hurmuzān and Jufayna was likely the result of a mental breakdown rather than of a true conspiracy. It was regarded by his peers as a crime rather than as a legitimate act of retaliation.<ref>{{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=69}}.</ref>
Some historical sources report that Abu Lu'lu'a was taken prisoner and executed for his assassination of Umar, while other sources claim that he committed suicide.<ref>{{harvnb|Pellat|2011}}.</ref> After Abu Lu'lu'a's death, his daughter was killed by [[Ubayd Allah ibn Umar]], one of Umar's sons. Acting upon the claim of one man (either [[Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf]] or [[Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr]]) that they had been seen conspiring with Abu Lu'lu'a while he was holding the double-bladed dagger, Ubayd Allah also killed Hurmuzān (Umar's Persian military adviser), and Jufayna, a Christian man from [[al-Hira]] (Iraq) who had been taken to Medina to serve as a private tutor to a family in Medina.<ref>{{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=69}} (cf. p. 404, where Madelung refers to him as "Jufayna al-Naṣrānī").</ref> After Ubayd Allah was detained for these murders, he threatened to kill all foreign captives residing in Medina, as well as some others. Although Ubayd Allah may have been encouraged by his sister [[Hafsa bint Umar]] to avenge their father's death, his murder of Hurmuzān and Jufayna was likely the result of a mental breakdown rather than of a true conspiracy. It was regarded by his peers as a crime rather than as a legitimate act of retaliation.<ref>{{harvnb|Madelung|1997|p=69}}.</ref>

Revision as of 03:37, 25 July 2022

Abū Luʾluʾa Fīrūz
أبو لؤلؤة فيروز
Shrine of Abū Luʾluʾa in Kashan, Iran
BornUnknown date
Nahavand, Iran (likely)
DiedHistorical: 644
Medina, Arabia
Legendary: after 644
Kashan, Iran
Other namesBābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn
EraEarly Islamic period
Known forAssassinating the second caliph Umar

Abū Luʾluʾa Fīrūz (Arabic: أبو لؤلؤة فيروز; from Middle Persian: Pērōz), also known as Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn (بابا شجاع الدين), was a Sassanid Persian slave known for having assassinated Umar ibn al-Khattab (r. 634–644), the second Islamic caliph, in November 644.

After having been captured in battle during the Arab-Muslim conquest of Persia, Abu Lu'lu'a was brought to Medina, the then-capital of the Rashidun Caliphate, which was normally off-limits to non-Arab captives. However, as a highly skilled craftsman, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed entrance into the city in order to work for the caliph. Some Sunni sources believe that Abu Lu'lu'a asked the caliph to lift a tax imposed upon him by his Arab master, al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba. When Umar refused to lift the tax, Abu Lu'lu'a attacked him while he was leading the congregational prayer in the mosque, stabbing him with a double-bladed dagger and leaving him mortally wounded. However, this specific account of the event is very biased due to the many incentives existing for Sunni scholars/historians to tarnish the reputation of Abu Lulu'a. It is much more likely that Abu Lulu'a participated in preparatory planning that was unrelated to the reasons brought up by Sunni sources with a man named Hurmuzān, an ex-Sassanid military officer.

According to historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was either captured and executed in Medina or committed suicide there. In retaliation, Ubayd Allah ibn Umar (one of Umar's sons) killed Abu Lu'lu'a's daughter; Hurmuzān and Jufayna, a Christian man from al-Hira (Iraq) who worked as a private tutor for a family in Medina.

However, according to later legends that were first recorded in the Safavid era, the prophet Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law Ali (later revered as the first Shi'ite Imam), saved Abu Lu'lu'a from his pursuers and miraculously transported him to the city of Kashan (Iran), where Abu Lu'lu'a married and lived out the rest of his life. At some point, a shrine was erected for him there, which from the 16th century onward became the focus of a yearly nationalistic festival celebrating Abu Lu'lu'a's assassination of Umar (whom Shi'ites consider to be the most oppressive early caliph), called Omar Koshan (lit.'the killing of Umar').

Name

Abu Lu'lu'a's given name was most likely Pērōz, a Middle Persian name meaning "Victorious" and Arabicized in the extant sources as Fīrūz or Fayrūz.[1] However, in the early sources he is more commonly referred to by his Arabic kunya (teknonym) Abū Luʾluʾa, meaning "Father of Pearl".[2] From the 16th or 17th century onward he also received the Arabic laqab (honorific nickname) Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn (lit.'Father Courageous of the Faith'), which was associated with the annual celebrations held in his honor in early modern Iran (see below).[3]

Biography

Early 20th-century depiction of Abd al-Rahman (ibn Awf or ibn Abi Bakr) witnessing the purported conspiracy of Abu Lu'lu'a, Hurmuzān, and Jufayna (wrongly depicted here as a woman; the depiction of the murder weapon may also be wrong)[4]

Very little is known about his life.[5] According to some historical accounts, Abu Lu'lu'a was a Zoroastrian from Nahavand (Iran), though other reports describe him as a Christian.[6] A highly skilled joiner and blacksmith,[7] Abu Lu'lu'a was probably taken captive by his Arab master al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba in the Battle of Nahavand (642) and subsequently brought to Arabia, where he may also have converted to Islam.[8] Other historical sources report that he was rather taken captive by al-Mughira in the Battle of al-Qadisiyya (636), or that he was sold to al-Mughira by Hurmuzān, an ex-Sassanid military officer who had been working for Umar as an adviser after his own capture by the Muslims.[9] Although Medina was generally off-limits to the ʿajam (non-Arabs) under Umar's reign, Abu Lu'lu'a was exceptionally allowed to enter the capital of the early caliphate, being sent there by al-Mughira to serve the caliph.[10]

A multitude of possible reasons existed for Abu Lulu'a to murder Umar. One of the most prominent reasons being that Abu Lulu'a was a Persian and was attempting to get revenge for the conquering of his native lands and the enslavement of the inhabitants of the Sassanid empire. Umar's harsh policies against non-Arabs are also likely to have played a prominent role.[11] One day when Umar was leading the congregational prayer in the mosque of Medina, Abu Lu'lu'a stabbed him with a double-bladed dagger.[12] There are different versions of how this happened: according to one version, he also killed Kulayb ibn al-Bukayr al-Laythi who was behind Umar,[13] while in another version he stabbed thirteen people who tried to restrain him.[14] According to some accounts, the caliph died on the same day, while other accounts maintain that he died three days later.[15] In any case, Umar died of his wounds on Wednesday 26 Dhu al-Hijja of the Islamic year 23 (6 November 644 according to the Gregorian calendar).[16]

Some historical sources report that Abu Lu'lu'a was taken prisoner and executed for his assassination of Umar, while other sources claim that he committed suicide.[17] After Abu Lu'lu'a's death, his daughter was killed by Ubayd Allah ibn Umar, one of Umar's sons. Acting upon the claim of one man (either Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf or Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Bakr) that they had been seen conspiring with Abu Lu'lu'a while he was holding the double-bladed dagger, Ubayd Allah also killed Hurmuzān (Umar's Persian military adviser), and Jufayna, a Christian man from al-Hira (Iraq) who had been taken to Medina to serve as a private tutor to a family in Medina.[18] After Ubayd Allah was detained for these murders, he threatened to kill all foreign captives residing in Medina, as well as some others. Although Ubayd Allah may have been encouraged by his sister Hafsa bint Umar to avenge their father's death, his murder of Hurmuzān and Jufayna was likely the result of a mental breakdown rather than of a true conspiracy. It was regarded by his peers as a crime rather than as a legitimate act of retaliation.[19]

In early 20th-century scholarship it was sometimes supposed that Abu Lu'lu'a had really been an instrument in the hands of a conspiracy, though not a conspiracy led by Hurmuzān, but rather one led by Ali, al-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, and Talha ibn Ubayd Allah. These men, who according to the historical sources were appointed by Umar himself as members of the council who would elect the next caliph, were thought by scholars to have conspired to overthrow Umar's reign and to put Ali in his place.[20] This hypothesis, however, is rejected by more recent scholars.[21] Nevertheless, while Ubayd Allah was subsequently acquitted of his crimes by Umar's successor Uthman (r. 644–656), who considered the execution of Ubayd Allah an excessive measure in view of his father's recent assassination,[22] Ali, among others, did protest against this and vowed to apply the regular punishment for murder if he were ever to be caliph.[23]

Wilferd Madelung has pointed out that just like Abu Lu'lu'a's assassination of Umar over something as trivial as a tax burden, Ubayd Allah's retaliatory killing of apparently random non-Arabs bears witness to the strong tensions that existed between Arabs and non-Arabs in the early Islamic caliphate.[24] According to Tayeb El-Hibri, the 9th-century historians who recorded these events (amongst others, Ibn Sa'd, al-Baladhuri, al-Tabari) regarded them as laying the first seeds of the special affinity between Persia and the Hashimid family of the prophet (including Ali), which would later be reflected in the crucial role played by Khurasani converts in overthrowing the Umayyads and establishing the Hashimid rule of the Abbasids during the Abbasid revolution (750 CE).[25]

Legacy

Sanctuary in Kashan

According to later legends, Abu Lu'lu'a did not die in Medina, but was miraculously saved from his pursuers by Ali, who transported him by means of a special prayer to Kashan (a city in central Iran), where he married and lived out the rest of his life.[26] This story was recorded by the anti-Shi'ite polemicist Mirza Makhdum Sharifi (1540/41–1587),[27] but Abu Lu'lu'a's connections to Kashan seem to go back further, since already in the Mujmal al-tawārīkh wa-l-qiṣaṣ (an anonymous work written c. 1126) it is mentioned that Abu Lu'lu'a came from Fin, a village near Kashan.[28] At some point a shrine was dedicated to Abu Lu'lu'a in the vicinity of Kashan, which was said to be built over his tomb.[29] The first records of Abu Lu'lu'a's tomb in Kashan appear in the works of Ghiyath al-Din Khwandamir (c. 1475 – c. 1535) and Nur Allah al-Shushtari (1549–1610).[30]

Recently, there has been some controversy over this sanctuary, with a number of Sunni institutions, such as the al-Azhar University and the International Union for Muslim Scholars, demanding the Iranian government demolish the shrine.[31] The shrine was reportedly shut down in 2007 by Ayatollah Mohammad-Ali Taskhiri, who is known as a strong proponent of Sunni-Shi'i reconciliation.[32]

Annual celebration

Shrine of Abu Lu'lu'a in Kashan, Iran

During the 16th-century conversion of Iran to Shia Islam under Safavid rule, a festival began being held in honor of Abu Lu'lu'a and his assassination of Umar.[33] Named Omar-koshan (lit.'the killing of Umar'), it was originally held around Abu Lu'lu'a's sanctuary in Kashan, on the anniversary of Umar's death (26 Dhu al-Hijja).[34] Later the celebration spread elsewhere in Iran, and was sometimes held on 9 Rabi' al-Awwal rather than on 26 Dhu al-Hijja.[35]

The festival celebrated Abu Lu'lu'a, nicknamed Bābā Shujāʿ al-Dīn (lit.'Father Courageous of the Faith'), as a national hero who had defended the religion by killing the oppressive caliph.[36] Umar was not only seen as a persecutor of non-Arabs, he was also thought to have threatened and injured Muhammad's daughter and Ali's wife Fatima.[37] Because of this, Umar came to be regarded by Shi'is (who revere Fatima) as a symbol of the oppression of their sect.[38] The festival celebrating Umar's assassin was also part of a wider tradition of ritually cursing the first three Rashidun caliphs, who are revered by Sunnis but regarded by Shi'is as usurpers of Ali's rightful position as caliph.[39] It involved the beating and burning of effigies of Umar, accompanied by cursing and the recitation of vilifying poetry.[40]

Improving political relations between Qajar Iran (1789–1925) and the Sunni Ottomans, as well as the rise of pan-Islamism (an ideology advocating the unity of all Islamic sects) in the late 19th century, lead to the festival's gradual decline.[41] After the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the ritual was officially banned in the Islamic Republic of Iran.[42] Nevertheless, the festival is still celebrated, though often secretly and indoors, and is now held from 9 until 27 Rabi' Al-Awwal.[43]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Most sources that specify his given name mention "Fīrūz"; see Ishkevari & Nejad 2008; Pellat 2011 ("Fērōz", an alternative transliteration of the same). Calmard 1996, p. 161 and Fischer 1980, p. 16 refer to him as "Firuz", while Madelung 1997, p. 75 gives his fuller name as "Abū Luʾluʾa Fayrūz". On the Parthian and Middle Persian origin of the name, see Chkeidze 2012; on its meaning "Victorious", see Rezakhani 2017, p. 78.
  2. ^ Cf. the usage in Levi Della Vida & Bonner 1960–2007; Pellat 2011; Madelung 1997, pp. 68–70, 75, 346; El-Hibri 2010, pp. 107–114 et pass. In modern Persian this becomes Abō Loʾloʾ or Abū Luʾluʾ (see Ishkevari 1994–2020), a usage sometimes also adopted elsewhere (e.g., by Torab 2007 or Ishkevari & Nejad 2008).
  3. ^ Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23; Calmard 1996, p. 161.
  4. ^ Madelung 1997, p. 404 refers to Jufayna as "al-Naṣrānī", indicating that he was a man. Moreover, while the murder weapon seems to be depicted here as a split-blade sword (like Zulfiqar), El-Hibri 2010, p. 109 describes it as "a unique dagger", having "two pointed sharp edges, with a handle in the middle". The picture is taken from Tārīkhunā bi-uslūb qaṣaṣī ('Our History in a Narrative style'), a popular history book first published in Iraq in 1935.
  5. ^ Ishkevari & Nejad 2008.
  6. ^ Pellat 2011. Modern authors also take different views: Levi Della Vida & Bonner 1960–2007 merely state that he was a Christian slave, whereas Madelung 1997, p. 75, note 67 finds the sources claiming he was Christian unreliable. Ishkevari & Nejad 2008 mention that according to the Mujmal al-tawārīkh wa-l-qiṣaṣ, an anonymous work written c. 1126 CE, Abu Lu'lu'a came from Fin, a village near Kashan.
  7. ^ Pellat 2011.
  8. ^ This is the view of Madelung 1997, p. 75, note 67.
  9. ^ See the sources cited by El-Hibri 2010, pp. 108–109 (cf. also p. 112).
  10. ^ Pellat 2011; cf. Madelung 1997, p. 75, note 64.
  11. ^ This is the hypothesis of Madelung 1997, p. 75.
  12. ^ El-Hibri 2010, p. 109 describes the dagger as "unique", having "two pointed sharp edges, with a handle in the middle".
  13. ^ Smith, G. Rex, ed. (1994). The History of al-Ṭabarī, Volume XIV: The Conquest of Iran, A.D. 641–643/A.H. 21–23. SUNY Series in Near Eastern Studies. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-7914-1293-0. Cf. El-Hibri 2010, p. 109. See also Caetani 1905–1926, vol. V, p. 216.
  14. ^ El-Hibri 2010, p. 109.
  15. ^ Pellat 2011.
  16. ^ Levi Della Vida & Bonner 1960–2007; Pellat 2011.
  17. ^ Pellat 2011.
  18. ^ Madelung 1997, p. 69 (cf. p. 404, where Madelung refers to him as "Jufayna al-Naṣrānī").
  19. ^ Madelung 1997, p. 69.
  20. ^ Caetani 1905–1926, vol. V, pp. 40–51, as reported by Madelung 1997, pp. 68–70.
  21. ^ Madelung 1997, pp. 68–70; Levi Della Vida & Bonner 1960–2007; Pellat 2011.
  22. ^ Madelung 1997, p. 70.
  23. ^ Madelung 1997, pp. 69–70.
  24. ^ Madelung 1997, p. 75.
  25. ^ El-Hibri 2010, pp. 107–108, cf. pp. 90–92.
  26. ^ Fischer 1980, p. 16; Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23.
  27. ^ In his al-Nawāqiḍ li-bunyān al-rawāfiḍ, written in 1580: see Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23; on Sharifi, see Ghereghlou 2016.
  28. ^ Ishkevari & Nejad 2008.
  29. ^ Algar 1990; Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23.
  30. ^ Ishkevari & Nejad 2008.
  31. ^ Ismail 2016, p. 93, who also refers to the Al Arabiya news report by Isma'il 2007.
  32. ^ Mavani 2016, p. 137.
  33. ^ Algar 1990; Torab 2007, p. 196.
  34. ^ Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23; cf. Algar 1990. The festival is also mentioned by Mirza Makhdum Sharifi (1540/41–1587) in his al-Nawāqiḍ li-bunyān al-rawāfiḍ (written 1580).
  35. ^ Calmard 1996, p. 161; Algar 1990.
  36. ^ Calmard 1996, p. 161; Johnson 1994, p. 127, note 23; Torab 2007, p. 196.
  37. ^ Torab 2007, p. 195.
  38. ^ Stewart 1996, p. 47; Mavani 2016, p. 137.
  39. ^ Algar 1990.
  40. ^ Algar 1990; Torab 2007, p. 194. An example of such vilifying poetry is cited by Stewart 1996, p. 47.
  41. ^ Algar 1990.
  42. ^ Torab 2007, pp. 194–195.
  43. ^ Torab 2007, pp. 195, 198.

Sources