Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Line 310: Line 310:
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]]</bdi> 23:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]]</bdi> 23:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=24820268 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=24820268 -->

==April 2023==
I've gone ahead with th4e re-nomination of the James Madison article. There is a rewritten Slavery section now per some of your comments from 2 months ago. Possibly you could finish the Source and Image review which you had started 2 months ago if time allows. Cheers. [[User:ErnestKrause|ErnestKrause]] ([[User talk:ErnestKrause|talk]]) 14:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 4 April 2023

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
HouseBlaster 105 7 0 94 Open 00:50, 23 June 2024 2 days, 22 hours no report


New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello Hawkeye7,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Would you be willing to help Leonard W. Murray

Admiral Murray was a very important WW2 Admiral - not just my opinion - he was the only Canadian to command a theatre of war in WW2, and he is hoping to get to FA status in the next month. In time for the anniversary of the Battle of the Atlantic. I am trying to get a good peer review going before nominating for FA, and I really need an experienced peer reviewer who knows military history (not necessarily Canadian though). I would be most grateful if you could review the article and suggest improvements of any sort (we think it is pretty good already but an experienced second opinion is super helpful). Thanks Friendofleonard (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. No problem. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Friendofleonard (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hawkeye7 I will make some edits in the next couple of days (I am going to Navy archives tomorrow) and would you be ready to give it a review at the end of this week. Friendofleonard (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can have a look at the weekend. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the peer review status and plan to get it into the FAC queue this weekend. I found it a little hard to navigate last time. Friendofleonard (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hawkeye. The article has been given a thorough scrubbing, with many thanks to you for your detailed review - from which learned a lot. The comparison with Leahy was very helpful. I have now posted it for FA nomination in the nomination queue, and would appreciate further advice or support at this point. Thanks again. Friendofleonard (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-10

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is currently a featured article removal candidate. I heard you are good with this stuff, but I also heard you are busy, so you can ignore this if you want. Please fix the article. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did PM Chris Watson support or oppose federation?

Hi Hawkeye7, I recently came across a clear contradiction in the artcles on the ALP and Chris Watson. The ALP lead says he supported federation, but the Chris Watson lead says he opposed it, both without cites. My knowledge of Australian history would barely fill Captain Cook's bicorne, but I don't think we should have a contradiction like that in two articles on important topics. I know you mainly do military history, but could you take a look at the messages I left on the edit pages? Thanks, Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

Howard Florey

Hi. I agree that 'further reading' is for books not cited in the text. But the section listing items that are cited in the text is entitled 'References' (see this article for example Joseph Banks). My edit was therefore to correct the heading from 'Notes' to 'References' Thanks Point of Presencetalk 20:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:NOTES permits different styles. For examples, see USS Marmora (1862) and William D. Leahy, currently at FAC. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks. I'll resist the temptation to 'tidy up' in future then ;-) Point of Presencetalk 10:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this have triggered an ACM nomination for Auntieruth and myself? I wonder if that from a few months ago is cropping up again. Hog Farm Talk 14:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will investigate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Getting the Bot to process these is a bit of work so I've processed them manually. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 14 reviews between October and December 2022. Hog Farm (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Aye, Hawkeye. I went ahead and restored the original infobox that has been in use for some time. As I think you agree, we should have more than a passing, day old, marginal consensus to make the sort of change proposed --by an editor with an apparent Single-purpose account who has a history of making veiled statements with this sort of thing. See these Talk page sections: 1, 2 and 3. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion affecting AFL Women's season seven

Hey Hawkeye7 – hope you're doing well. There's a discussion happening at WT:AFL regarding the sequencing of sections in Australian rules football season articles, and thought I'd reach out in case you wanted to weigh in given you helped promote AFL Women's season seven to GA status and it would affect this article. Thanks! 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 00:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: February 2023





Headlines
  • Albania report: I Edit Wikipedia Online Campaign 2023
  • Belgium report: Public Domain Day Belgium 2023
  • Brazil report: GLAM-Wiki initiatives in Brazil spark academic investigation
  • Croatia report: Activities during first two months of 2023
  • Indonesia report: Launching of Wikisource Loves Manuscripts; Bincang GLAM continues
  • Italy report: New project and collaboration in February
  • Kosovo report: I Edit Wikipedia Online Campaign 2023
  • New Zealand report: Wikidata and the Biodiversity Heritage Library, Wellington WikiCon 2023 and Auckland Museum local suburb project funding
  • Poland report: The European GLAM Coordinators online meet-up; GLAM-Wiki workshop at the Wawel Royal Castle State Art Collection; Wikimedians-in-residence online meet up
  • Sweden report: 100 000 Bildminnen; Report from The Association of Swedish Museums; Wikipedia for all of Sweden; ArkDes edit-a-thons
  • UK report: In Memoriam Jo Pugh / Cultural Diversity
  • USA report: Black History Month and More
  • Wiki Loves Living Heritage report: Wiki Loves Living Heritage launches 17 March 1pm UTC
  • WMF GLAM report: Gender, language, and living heritage events in collaboration with affiliates
  • Calendar: March's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2023-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Esmond Venner Keogh

On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Esmond Venner Keogh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Esmond Venner Keogh was awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal in World War I and later protested against the Vietnam War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Esmond Venner Keogh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Esmond Venner Keogh), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bonnie J. Dunbar

On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonnie J. Dunbar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NASA astronaut Bonnie J. Dunbar (pictured) flew on five space missions and has spent more than 50 days in space? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonnie J. Dunbar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bonnie J. Dunbar), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 10,394 views (866.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

Tech News: 2023-12

MediaWiki message delivery 01:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you today for Jim Lovell, "about the second oldest living American astronaut after his Gemini 7 and Apollo 8 crew mate Frank Borman. He also flew the Gemini 12 mission with Buzz Aldrin, who is two years younger. Lovell was part of the Next Nine group of astronauts selected in 1962 that also included Neil Armstrong, and he was Armstrong's backup for the Apollo 11 mission. Today he is probably best known for his unsuccessful final mission, Apollo 13, which was made into the 1995 film Apollo 13, in which he appeared."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-13

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

trivial diffs

Hawkeye7, are you aware that the diff that FACBot provides when closing a nomination sometimes compares an old version of a nomination with itself? for example, in this diff, FACBot provides this diff, which shows no difference between the two versions compared because they are the same version of the fac nomination. if this was the intended behaviour, please ignore me. dying (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

Tech News: 2023-14

MediaWiki message delivery 23:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

I've gone ahead with th4e re-nomination of the James Madison article. There is a rewritten Slavery section now per some of your comments from 2 months ago. Possibly you could finish the Source and Image review which you had started 2 months ago if time allows. Cheers. ErnestKrause (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]