User talk:Leito.Cmj

Your article Abadía de Rufford

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Abadía de Rufford to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. TJH2018talk 19:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Abadía de Rufford

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Abadía de Rufford. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rufford Abbey. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rufford Abbey – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Valenciano (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Abadía de Rufford with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Gladamas^talk 21:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

November 2022

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Leito.Cmj, I'm DanCherek and I am a Wikipedia administrator. I realize that it has been frustrating to see the text at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk removed and redacted, especially after you said that tudorpalace.com.ar has given you the authorization to use it on Wikipedia. However, we have an established protocol at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online that editors need to follow in situations like these. Essentially, the copyright holder can either modify their website to indicate that the material is compatibly licensed, or they can correspond with a Wikipedia volunteer who is a part of a team called the Volunteer Response Team (VRT), who will confirm that they are the copyright owner and have taken the necessary steps. One of those two verification procedures needs to happen before the text on that website can be added to any article. It's not that we disbelieve you, but this is needed to ensure that all protocols are properly followed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hans Holbein. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Howard, 13th Earl of Arundel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your recent contributions to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Mister WOGnam (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the notice. I don't destroy anything, I just like to collaborate because I always admired the interesting and tragic story of the Duke. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I want to contribute in the best possible way. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent contributions to Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Mister WOGnam (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for the notice. I don't destroy anything, I just like to collaborate because I always admired the interesting and tragic story of the Duke. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I want to contribute in the best possible way. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Ignore them, they are a vandal. I suggest deleting these from your talk page. Muhandes (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I am not a vandal, I am simply a humble historian who also teaches, being a history teacher at a High School here in Argentina and I want to give my best contributions to history. Leito.Cmj (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Not you, the other editor is a vandal. They randomly undo edits and leave "warnings. I suggest you delete both of these "warnings" from your talk page. Muhandes (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You are absolutely right, friend Muhandes, that Mister WOGnam only threatens and threatens when we try to correct a specific point in history. I am a historian who loves to make specific and concrete contributions. Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Your edit to Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the corrections. Leito.Cmj (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Leito.Cmj, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as LuisCanelo.MJ (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

The guy uploaded a portrait of a woman that remains unnamed as the Duchess of Norfolk. I’ve had to edit several pages and take the portrait out. Lady Meg (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Lady Meg the portrait was uploaded by the user @LuisCanelo.MJ and by the way there is some advice for Luis: the next time you upload a portrait, check the source if it is about such a person or not, because they can suspend you from Wikipedia. It's good advice, don't take it badly or anything, it's just advice so that you do better and have a better relationship with Wikipedians. Greetings. Leito.Cmj (talk) 17:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello people @Lady Meg @Leito.Cmj and fellow Wikipedians, good afternoon from this side of the world. I admit I made a mistake, but I was mainly guided by this video on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YStjSMK_Sxc . If the video is unreliable, let me know and I will try not to watch any more sites with unreliable sources. Greetings from Chile. LuisCanelo.MJ (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Those videos on that channel are like sensational videos. There’s no source confirming the identity of that portrait in the video. I still don’t understand where the portrait came from. Did you take a screenshot? There is no portrait of the Duchess by Joos Ban Cleve. The guy was living in Antwerp. Don’t think he ever went to England. Lady Meg (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

• joos van cleve

Lady Meg (talk) 07:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Lady Meg good morning from this part of the world. As a historian and university history professor (I also clarify that I have Howard family ancestry from my maternal grandmother, descending from the Effingham branch) I am always guided by other study webpages like this one: https://thefreelancehistorywriter.com/2017 /08/25/elizabeth-stafford-duchess-of-norfolk/ . The same portrait is also on that webpage. Knowing and contributing about my ancestral family is great and if I made a mistake, I want to remedy it so I don't have problems and look good with fellow Wikipedians since I use Wikipedia a lot to prepare the papers that I later give to the students of the chair in which I teach (world history) in Legal Law (Legal Sciences or Bar) at the Universidad Católica de Chile. Greetings from Santiago de Chile. LuisCanelo.MJ (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Why are you boasting about something that probably can’t be proved? I’m so tired of people claiming descent from these people because the internet says so. If you actually GO TO THE website you provided you will see that she labels the portrait: “Portrait of a Woman, dated 1520 by the Netherlandish painter Joos van Cleve (1507-1541)” I personally know the author. Lady Meg (talk) 06:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Agnes Howard, Duchess of Norfolk into Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, I'm Trainsandotherthings. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Seaboard System Railroad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Trainsandotherthings the unit CSX #1982 has just gone into service. Source: https://www.facebook.com/100064785813730/posts/658178709684984/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

That is not a reliable source. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Perfect. Now I'm going to redo the note but quoting the two reliable sources of information I got: Trains Magazine and the official CSX website itself. Leito.Cmj (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello and thank you very much for the warning. Greetings. Leito.Cmj (talk) 14:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Honestly it hurts me that articles as beautiful as that one are eliminated but hey, copyright must be respected. Leito.Cmj (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hola @Diannaa good evening, with all due respect I think it is unfair that the user @Leito.Cmj who has made so many contributions about my ancestral Howard family (I am very surprised of what he knows, which is a lot and I congratulate to him for that big knowledge) is going to be blocked for copyright violation.

Do you know how many authorship violations I saw on Wikipedia? Many and many of those publications turn a blind eye.

Hola @Diannaa buenas tardes, con todo respeto yo creo que es injusto que al usuario @Leito.Cmj que tantos aportes ha hecho sobre mi familia ancestral Howard (estoy muy sorprendido de lo que el sabe, que es mucho y lo felicito por esos conocimientos) vayan a bloquearlo violación de derechos de autor.

Sabes cuantas violaciones de autoría vi en Wikipedia? Muchas y a muchas de esas publicaciones le hacen la vista gorda.

I express myself both in my native Spanish and in English to show my discontent about this threat made to this user, whom I would love to meet personally to congratulate him for his knowledge of Howard, my ancestral family. Greetings from Chile. CarlosSwinforeHoward (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Now you've committed yet another copyright violation; this time, you blatantly stole a copyrighted image from the internet and uploaded it as your own work, and then added it to an article. My patience is fast wearing out with your repeated copyright violations. Any further ones and I will be reporting you to ANI for an indefinite block. Again, this is your last warning. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Trainsandotherthings good evening, it is unfair that this user is blocked for something that he could have done innocently and perhaps hastily, without realizing the consequences. Many times we make rude mistakes and we regret it, but a mistake is not a reason for blocking. From mistakes you have to learn to never make them again. CarlosSwinforeHoward (talk) 03:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello @CarlosSwinforeHoward I thank you with all my heart for defending me. I have made rash mistakes without realizing the consequences. Once again I thank you. Leito.Cmj (talk) 03:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia has rules, and respecting copyright is among the most important. Your protestations are irrelevant. We all have to follow the rules. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@Trainsandotherthings you are right yes, doing things rashly yes, it is ugly and brings adverse consequences. Once again I apologize for my bad behavior. Leito.Cmj (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

You still don't get it. It doesn't matter if you attributed or not, you still do not have permission to upload images that are not released under a free license. It is becoming clear you lack the competence to edit on Wikipedia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Si fuera realmente una enciclopedia libre como dice ser, se citaría a todos los autores. Tengo cualidades para editar casi perfectamente pero solo con textos, aunque también a veces tengo mis excesos, como toda persona. Me disculpo una vez más por esto y juro ante las sagradas escrituras que nunca más volveré a cometer errores groseros y graves que pueden traerme consecuencias adversas. @Trainsandotherthings you'll see that this time I'm going to behave well. Greetings and a big hug from Argentina. Leito.Cmj (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

The only reason I haven't hauled you off to ANI is that I'm extremely tired and need to be up at 5 am tomorrow. If I see another copyright violation by you, you will not be so lucky. STOP uploading photos that you do not have the rights to, IMMEDIATELY. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

You will see that I am going to behave well... I make the promise and I am going to fulfill it to the letter. Leito.Cmj (talk) 00:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)