Talk:Critical race theory: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 74.95.43.253 - "→improvements to "2020s criticism" subsection: " |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
This article is flagged with "multiple issues" and requests for improvement, but editing seems to be turned off. |
This article is flagged with "multiple issues" and requests for improvement, but editing seems to be turned off. |
||
How does one improve the article if one is not permitted to edit it? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.95.43.253|74.95.43.253]] ([[User talk:74.95.43.253#top|talk]]) 19:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
How does one improve the article if one is not permitted to edit it? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/74.95.43.253|74.95.43.253]] ([[User talk:74.95.43.253#top|talk]]) 19:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:If you look in the upper right corner of the article page, you will see a lock icon. Hover the mouse over the icon, and you will see text that the article is semi-protected. This means that only established, verified editors are allowed to edit the article. This is gets set when people using anonymous and/or throw-away accounts descend on an article to make changes that violate Wikipedia policies on reliable, third party sources. Please see [[WP:PP|Wikipedia protection policy]] for details. [[User:TechBear|<b style="color: green">TechBear</b>]] | [[User talk:TechBear|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TechBear|Contributions]] 19:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:23, 6 November 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critical race theory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2021, when it received 11,222,132 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 6 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Wiki Education assignment: The Economics of Social Justice and Injustice
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Butterflies&rainbows (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Pitbulls004 (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Relevance of comment in lede
Is "rather than criticizing or blaming people" really a relevant comment? This is not included in other article uses of the term "critical"; Critical theory (which is very much related), Critical period, Critical point, etc. etc. Zilch-nada (talk) 23:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Contradictory? "race as a social construct with no biological basis" vs "advances the interests of white people"
The link to white people provided states "White is a racialized classification of people". It seems this article needs to be clarified to define "white people", as currently the article is saying "white people" is a racialized classification, which doesn't seem to fit with it being a "social construct". Or at least the apparent contradiction should be clarified.Jimhoward72 (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Money is a social construct" and "Five dollars are worth more than five cents" can both be true and coherent at the same time. Same with social construction of race. I don't see any contradiction. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see the contradiction. American nationality is a social construct with no biological basis, yet we can speak about advancing the interests of the American people. TFD (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- This seems to me to be the opposite of a contradiction: "racialization" is precisely equivalent to the social construction of race. And like most social constructs, "racialized classifications" serve reasonably clearly defined sets of social interests. Newimpartial (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannahangulo03 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Blythe27.
— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
improvements to "2020s criticism" subsection
With this section probably driving the bulk of traffic to the page, I think this section needs to be as well written as possible and would like to start a discussion on that.
In particular, I think the section could benefit from more information on the history of Christopher Rufo's discovery of CRT and realization that it could be used as a wedge issue. Additionally, the differences between CRT and DEI are not demarcated enough in this section. Finally, the line "in response to CRT being taught in schools" needs a big [citation needed] because I don't believe there are any known cases of curricula that include graduate-level critical theory in k-12 schooling. Perhaps "in response to the perception that CRT was being taught in schools" or "in response to the assertion from Christopher Rufo that CRT was being taught in schools." The section on DEI probably belongs on an entirely separate page, since DEI and CRT are two different things that are wrongly conflated for one another. Mccartneyac (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Not improvable?
This article is flagged with "multiple issues" and requests for improvement, but editing seems to be turned off. How does one improve the article if one is not permitted to edit it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you look in the upper right corner of the article page, you will see a lock icon. Hover the mouse over the icon, and you will see text that the article is semi-protected. This means that only established, verified editors are allowed to edit the article. This is gets set when people using anonymous and/or throw-away accounts descend on an article to make changes that violate Wikipedia policies on reliable, third party sources. Please see Wikipedia protection policy for details. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 19:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Continental philosophy articles
- Low-importance Continental philosophy articles
- Continental philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States History articles
- Low-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Low-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class culture articles
- Low-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report