Jump to content

User talk:Jayson: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Advice: new section [Factotum]
Advice: Reply
Line 110: Line 110:


Also said this at the helpdesk.<br/>Don't add your own pictures, or address or phone number or social media handles. Internet is not a safe place, and anything you save here becomes public and will stay with you your whole life. Let your older self make those decisions for you.<span id="Usedtobecool:1708491719333:User_talkFTTCLNPetjayso" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;'''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]]'''&nbsp;[[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]] 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)</span>
Also said this at the helpdesk.<br/>Don't add your own pictures, or address or phone number or social media handles. Internet is not a safe place, and anything you save here becomes public and will stay with you your whole life. Let your older self make those decisions for you.<span id="Usedtobecool:1708491719333:User_talkFTTCLNPetjayso" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;'''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]]'''&nbsp;[[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]] 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)</span>

:Indeed. Please read [[Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors]] and seriously consider removing any personal information you've made available. [[Special:Contributions/57.140.16.1|57.140.16.1]] ([[User talk:57.140.16.1|talk]]) 14:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 21 February 2024

May 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Petjayso! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Petjayso. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Debbie Critchfield, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GoingBatty (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GoingBatty I understand, I just met her once and I need to make this article. It's about time someone made one for her! Petjayso (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debbie Critchfield (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 20:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware that I did such a thing lol. I was also not aware that there was such a rule on Wikipedia. Thank you for notifying me. Petjayso (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wait a minute. I was not overlinking. There were links for Android and iOS already, but there were so for the Consoles that had Among Us aswell. In the same section. Why remove the links I added when you did not remove the other links? Idk its just not making a whole lot of sense to me. Petjayso (talk) 01:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debbie Critchfield (May 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Also written like a personal profile, in an unencyclopedic tone – that could be fixed by editing, but the lack of notability can't.
bonadea contributions talk 11:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea Uhhh, other editors HAVE claimed that Debbie IS notable. She is in a statewide position Petjayso (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At the AfC Petjayso (talk) 13:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The sources show zero notability. --bonadea contributions talk 14:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea Huh? the Petjayso (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oops typo. Ballptpedia is a reliable source Petjayso (talk) 14:49, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea Her predecessors had articles Petjayso (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salva Dut (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing Yooo I remember you! Anyway, I kinda expected that. I made it quickly, and I made it at school. I made it because as a class we read a long walk to water so I was excited to learn that Salva was a real person and the book was not fiction! I looked him up on Wikipedia as I am chronically on Wikipedia and I found it was a redirect :/
I made it quickly.and I did not include many citations. Thank you for declining my article so I can make it better :D!
Petjayso (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Also said this at the helpdesk.
Don't add your own pictures, or address or phone number or social media handles. Internet is not a safe place, and anything you save here becomes public and will stay with you your whole life. Let your older self make those decisions for you. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and seriously consider removing any personal information you've made available. 57.140.16.1 (talk) 14:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]