Jump to content

Talk:Tanzania: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Pan-Africanism: new section
Line 189: Line 189:
== Pan-Africanism ==
== Pan-Africanism ==


The usual suspects have suggested that the Arusha Declaration underscores Tanzania's commitment to Pan-Africanism - er, no it doesn't! This kind of historical linkage to the ideological hobby-horse of the 'diaspora' is all throughout African History articles on Wikipedia. Almost like Wikipedia is serving to create the African History some Americans wish it had! [[Special:Contributions/144.134.56.177|144.134.56.177]] ([[User talk:144.134.56.177|talk]]) 13:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
The usual suspects have suggested that the Arusha Declaration underscores Tanzania's commitment to Pan-Africanism - er, no it doesn't! This kind of historical linkage to the ideological hobby-horse of the 'diaspora' is all throughout African History articles on Wikipedia. Almost like Wikipedia is serving to create the African History some Americans wish it had! There is a singular clause in the Declaration that mentions African Unity however, if you were to take for example the nominal "all people are created equal" clause (or any other) you could make an equally viable case that the Arusha Declaration underscores a commitment to Christianity (or similar) - which it doesn't. Pan-Africanism is not mentioned in the Arusha Declaration and was known by the founders of Tanzania at the time many of whom would become extremely averse to it. [[Special:Contributions/144.134.56.177|144.134.56.177]] ([[User talk:144.134.56.177|talk]]) 13:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:09, 2 March 2024


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emmapdonahue.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 22 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rossdanielbarrie.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


lmao @ this end stat

"making it the most populous country located entirely south of the equator."

In the sense that Indonesia technically extends north of the equatorial line.

I'm going to remove it. If the OG author reverts it, I will not die on this hill.

Jondvdsn1 (talk) 10:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article

The etimology of Zanzibar's name as provided on this page is quite poor as compared to the one that can be found on the separate page on Zanzibar. Please copypaste that description here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.206.24.162 (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope from such a place that judge William Hussein Sekule for wrongly convicting Radovan Karadzic for resisting an attempted armed breakthrough out of Srebrenica in breach of surrender terms will be taken and sold as a slave to Saudi Arabia to further falsely support Islamic interests and there take the place as execution surrogate for an adulterer. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.158.34.229 (talk) 01:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Just an FYI, I've gotten some books from the library and will be attempting to clean this page up over the coming weeks! All thoughts/comments/help/revisions are welcome! Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confused by this article. Mentioned is the new constitution and election in 1995, and the name of the political party and president elected. Has there been no election since then? Carter1214 (talk) 00:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can work on that and expand 20 years of history. Sputink (talk) 00:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to talk about Tanzania independence, Its known that the country is a merger of two, Tanganyika and Zanzibar, now to put more details, Yes Zanzibar got independence 1963, at such it was a monarch under sultan of Zanzibar, later Zanzibar Revolution happened to overthrow the sultan, the event which was very important in creating tanzania, in celebrating their independence Tanzania has at least three dates, Tanganyika independence,Zanzibar Revolution and the day of the union, now I tried to include this Zanzibar Revolution here but it was removed, if we have to put the information about something please let put it all, no biasing please Almasimagorwa (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the national anthem's CC / closed captioning in English. Someone has added CC that is inappropriate. DaLaw (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are more than 100 ethnicities but there are no over 100 languages spoken in Tanzania,the reference and data you used is inaccurate or out of date. Tanzanians make the most population of swahili speakers and almost 99 percent of Tanzanians speak swahili and use it as a first language it's a recognized national language and now it's a de jure official language as it was signed by the President weeks ago. Tanzania has more than 100 tribes but it's no means of identity,there's much interaction amoung tribes,they live together marry each other speak swahili and slowly tribal languages are fading and are not used or spoken anymore. Swahili is the only language that connect Tanzanians and is spoken as the first language. Warid Great (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very true. The 10% figure for native swahili speakers is an outrage Nlivataye (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what you mean by "native speaker". As long as "tribal" languages are spoken, they are part of the background of every newborn individual of the "tribe", alongside swahili: he learns his community language in his family, then he learns swahili at school. In addition to this, I suggest not to use the adjective "tribal": this has nothing to do with political correctness (that I hate); I think that every culture deserves respect even if it is not recognized at an official level. I am a white European but I love Africa and its immense cultural richness perhaps more than some Africans do...--Gehadad (talk) 14:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Srebrenica breach of surrender terms attempted breakthrough to Tuzla under 5,000 dead Muslims in exchange for Western intervention confessed to by Halilovic and Hsdzhihalilovic to the sun or a similar name and now still the genocide in Bosnia against all the Bosnian Serbs with help and settlement of Turkish army fleeing genocide

Experienced Editors

Can some experienced editors provide some insight as to where this article needs work. I would be willing to fix or write anything. Just not sure where to start. -- Sputink (talk) 14:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When the UN took its vote to seat a delegation from Beijing instead of from Taiwan in 1971, members of the Tanzanian delegation started dancing in the General Assembly. You might start there.

Different PPPs

There are different GDP PPPs used in the economy section and the bar on the right. Both seem to be correct but one used the World Bank and the other used the International Monetary Fund. Should this be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hifear267 (talkcontribs) 17:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe if you add "(IMF)" or "(World Bank)" it would be fine. However, Looking at other countries infobox it seems they have stuck with the IMF figures. Sputink (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Tanzania. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion of subsection on women

Hello,

a subsection on women should be added to the section on demographics.
Kind regards,
Sarcelles (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article has several sentences in women, which should be merged into a seperate subsection. I would like to set up a subsection with some additional content next month.


Kind regards,
Sarcelles (talk) 05:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Figures in Science and Technology

The figures in the Science and Technology section seem to me to be beyond the scope of this article. They are very appropriate elsewhere (in the noted Main Article of Science and technology in Tanzania). While generally I agree with the WP:BEBOLD policy, I thought I would post here before deleting content. Dbsseven (talk) 17:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledgeable people

I believe this is the correct name that can be found in many country articles? Thank you--SvenAERTS (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Religion statistics

Hello, I disagree with the edits of the user Kitutia, because they do not match the source that is listed. I requested on their talk page for a new source if they want to change the statistics, but they changed back again after, so I'm writing here so we can discuss it. I appreciate thoughts on the disagreement to find a solution and what should be done next. Thank you! —{{u|Goldenshimmer}}|✝️|they/their|😹|T/C|☮️|John 15:12|🍂 04:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any suggestions on the actual statistics and their respective references? Nlivataye (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long Leading paragraph

Understand that Tanzania is many facets on its importance. Human evolution history, classical history, Islamic colonization, World War, Nationalism, Environment... But having very long leading paragraphs actually confuses casual reader. --Kittyhawk2 (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GDP

It’s been very long since the GDP both PPP and nominal has been changed and so are it’s per capita income. Do we have any new sources or updated information from the government? Nlivataye (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nlivataye: Long? It's updated couple of times a year from IMF quarterly projections, so it's not been a long time at all. The figures are, as far as stats are concerned, up to date. Do you suggest just arbitrarily changing the figures for no apparent reason with no reference like you have over at Gabon, Namibia and Botswana to push some kind of an agenda? Don't vandalize. ChrisTakey (talk) 02:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No that was never my intention. From now on I will always communicate with you here and present reliable sources and evidence before posting Nlivataye (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Official Language

The CIA Factbook suggests that Swahili is the official language[1]. Does anyone have any input on that? PureRED (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not seem to find any material that states that Arabic is truly an official language in Zanzibar. Sputink (talk) 14:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nyerere Bridge: Not a suspension bridge

The photo's description is incorrect, as that is obviously a cable-stayed bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.98.90.36 (talk) 03:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corona virus, musicians and artists

I think we should have a separate section for health and we should cover the way corona virus is being handled by the current gvt of Magufuli and his minions. Also I think it’s unfair that we don’t mention the many musicians and stars that dominate East African scenery in the greater Swahili Speaking world; people like Diamond, Alikiba, AY, Ray C as well as actors both deceased and alive Nlivataye (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

removed from lede until referenced

" One of the oldest known ethnic groups still existing, the Hadzabe, appears to have originated in Tanzania, and their oral history recalls ancestors who were tall and were the first to use fire, medicine, and lived in caves, much like Homo erectus or Homo heidelbergensis who lived in the same region before them.[citation needed] " - This is not reflected in the body of the article, either. HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign relations section

Greats, I believe Foreign relations section section needs to be redone. I notice there are many paragraphs on relations/events with single countries, all dated (also sourced) during JK's phase. These are no longer the case for relations of today, and phase 6.

Because these things are not the case for today, I do not think they should be included on main page of Tanzania. Maybe in history section of the Foreign Relations article?

Another idea is to not have paragraphs for individual events like these in article that is rarely updated. They have been there for almost 10 years, many outdate also many years. I was looking at country articles that have FA status. In their main article they only have a summery of foreign relations.

Perhaps it would be best if this main page only we also only had summery of the foreign relations, rather than new paragraphs for individual events and each country? Cover important things like EAC, AU and UN with only 1 or 2 small paragraph of bilateral relationships. Avoiding adding events that will be quickly outdated since TZ article is not as often maintained or updated.

Many well rated country articles do not separate the bilateral/multilateral sections. If TZ had a title-3 level section I think Arusha as HQ of EAC, and seat of AU courts, and UN courts for things like Rwanda. And place for treaties. This I think would be very informative information on article readers will benefit from. Arusha is better for its own section than the outdated bilateral information.

I welcome your thoughts and ideas! I hope to take a look at fixing the section sometime soon. If I do something others think is wrong please let me know! If you have other good ideas for this (or any other) sections please let me know. It would be nice to see the article as informative of current realities as possible, and other non-current information well place in marked history sections. BevoLJ (talk) 07:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tanzania's food security which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Major errors in the Tanzania page.

According to the page on Tanzania the president is Kanye West?? And that it borders Texas to the North and is a country in East Canada?? 196.252.244.133 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GDP

Can someone update the per capita income already using IMF or world bank updates. I once did and my edits were reversed RickyBlair668 (talk) 08:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Under what account did you do it? I'm sure if you add a source and an edit summary, there is unlikely to be any objection. CMD (talk) 12:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting pronunciations

Right at the beginning of the article our English IPA pronunciation disagrees with our English pronunciation respelling. I doubt /zə/ is meant to represent the same sound as zay, but I don't know if either is incorrect. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 21:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pan-Africanism

The usual suspects have suggested that the Arusha Declaration underscores Tanzania's commitment to Pan-Africanism - er, no it doesn't! This kind of historical linkage to the ideological hobby-horse of the 'diaspora' is all throughout African History articles on Wikipedia. Almost like Wikipedia is serving to create the African History some Americans wish it had! There is a singular clause in the Declaration that mentions African Unity however, if you were to take for example the nominal "all people are created equal" clause (or any other) you could make an equally viable case that the Arusha Declaration underscores a commitment to Christianity (or similar) - which it doesn't. Pan-Africanism is not mentioned in the Arusha Declaration and was known by the founders of Tanzania at the time many of whom would become extremely averse to it. 144.134.56.177 (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]