Talk:Men who have sex with men: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 8 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 8 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality}}, {{WikiProject LGBT studies}}, {{WikiProject Gender studies}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Sociology}}, {{WikiProject AIDS}}, {{WikiProject Demographics}}, {{WikiProject Men's Issues}}. |
→Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2024: new section |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
The content of this article is largely similar to [[Gay sexual practices]], should these articles be merged, or perhaps changed to show a clearer differentiation between MSM the clinical topic and GSP the sexuality topic? [[User:ペゴボド同士|ペゴボド同士]] ([[User talk:ペゴボド同士|talk]])08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC) |
The content of this article is largely similar to [[Gay sexual practices]], should these articles be merged, or perhaps changed to show a clearer differentiation between MSM the clinical topic and GSP the sexuality topic? [[User:ペゴボド同士|ペゴボド同士]] ([[User talk:ペゴボド同士|talk]])08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2024 == |
|||
{{edit semi-protected|Men who have sex with men|answered=no}} |
|||
Add [[:Category:Anal sex]] [[Special:Contributions/202.134.11.235|202.134.11.235]] ([[User talk:202.134.11.235|talk]]) 11:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:01, 6 April 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Men who have sex with men article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q4 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 15:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
American Concept
This is not scientific at all and was created by a dentist in the USA. It is a delusion of American culture and should not be presented in any way as science. For example, in regards to HIV, over half the cases are young African women in south eastern African, not 'men who have sex with men'. They are using American samples then trying to apply it to humanity. These samples even represent a sub-group of the people they define, as if viruses just 'appear in men'. To think that women cannot get STD/Is is unscientific utterly. This belongs in the Flat Earth section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.211.228 (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Why is MLM inconsistently italicized?
Should it be MLM or written MLM ? Is there a way to know when it should be italicized or is it a stylistic choice that has not been consistent throughout the article? Thanks for helping Narbine (talk) 22:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Narbine: I'm many months late here, but the reason is MOS:WORDSASWORDS. It can look a bit weird in an article about a term like this, because of all the swapping between italicised and un-italicised text, but it is how the MOS recommends to write. Endwise (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
First sentence alteration
Where it states "They may identify as gay, homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, or heterosexual" could we please include omnisexual and trisexual in order to try and better represent the spectra of preference as I find their omission not quite problematic but a little troublesome. Thanks! 5.81.14.202 (talk) 17:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Those terms are much less common, and it was never meant to be an exhaustive list, nor would such a thing be practical. Crossroads -talk- 01:44, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Redundancy
The content of this article is largely similar to Gay sexual practices, should these articles be merged, or perhaps changed to show a clearer differentiation between MSM the clinical topic and GSP the sexuality topic? ペゴボド同士 (talk)08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2024
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Men who have sex with men. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Add Category:Anal sex 202.134.11.235 (talk) 11:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- B-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class AIDS articles
- Top-importance AIDS articles
- WikiProject AIDS articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Men's Issues articles
- Unknown-importance Men's Issues articles
- WikiProject Men's Issues articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Q4
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests