Talk:The Artist (film): Difference between revisions
→Invoking William Powell?: new section |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
== Invoking William Powell? == |
== Invoking William Powell? == |
||
The lead character resembles and seems at least partially inspired by old school Hollywood icon William Powell who got his start in silent films. [[Special:Contributions/2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51|2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51]] ([[User talk:2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51|talk]]) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC) |
The lead character resembles and seems at least partially inspired by old school Hollywood icon William Powell (1892-1984) who got his start in silent films. [[Special:Contributions/2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51|2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51]] ([[User talk:2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51|talk]]) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:14, 12 May 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Artist (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 120 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 3 January 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Plot derived directly from
Paul Auster's 2002 novel "The Book of Illusion". Which refers to the old and true tales of silent stars with accents and also to their more recent imitator: New York theater impressario Charles Ludlum, who himself slipped untimely into silence in 1987.
French American
Wikipedia often considers movies to from more than one country. The article mentions controversy about whether it's French or American. Can't it just be both? JDDJS (talk) 03:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- It can, but via consensus. There's a hidden comment in the lead (which you must have seen when removing it) that invites users to discuss this issue here first. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I did comment here first, but then, after looking at the previous discussion, I saw that the idea of it being both French and American was never really discussed. It being both French and American makes more sense than it being just one or the other. JDDJS (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- The nationality was discussed and the consensus was that it is a French film. Incidentally, does anyone know why there is no link to the archives of this talk page? Mezigue (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- I read the archive. There is no clear consensus from there. Several editors have bought up the idea it being French-American. It was filmed in America, besides the two leads, almost all of the all actors were American, it was distributed by American company and the producers marketed it as an American film. While I agree that if it could only be from one country, it would be French and not American, that is not the case. Many films are considered to be from multiple countries. This is one of them. JDDJS (talk) 18:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- The Weinstein Company was merely its U.S. distributor, a common practice for foreign films. It was distributed in France by the French arm of Warner Bros., which distributes numerous independent French films; AFAIK Warner Bros. did not distribute the film outside France. It also received a French visa d'exploitation (French Wikipedia) number but not an MPAA number, which I understand is typical for French films released in the U.S. (It did receive an MPAA rating, but not an MPAA number like most U.S.-released films. I believe the last Best Picture winner before it without an MPAA number was Midnight Cowboy, probably because it was originally rated X. The only other winner since 1931 without an MPPDA/MPAA number, Tom Jones, was distributed in the U.S. by non-MPAA Lopert Pictures.) Its production & distribution arrangements were largely in line with a French film, even though in the U.S. its dialogue (both easily-changeable intertitles and the few spoken lines at the end) was entirely in English. I still believe it is properly a French film, not a co-production. --RBBrittain (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- I read the archive. There is no clear consensus from there. Several editors have bought up the idea it being French-American. It was filmed in America, besides the two leads, almost all of the all actors were American, it was distributed by American company and the producers marketed it as an American film. While I agree that if it could only be from one country, it would be French and not American, that is not the case. Many films are considered to be from multiple countries. This is one of them. JDDJS (talk) 18:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- The nationality was discussed and the consensus was that it is a French film. Incidentally, does anyone know why there is no link to the archives of this talk page? Mezigue (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- I did comment here first, but then, after looking at the previous discussion, I saw that the idea of it being both French and American was never really discussed. It being both French and American makes more sense than it being just one or the other. JDDJS (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure why the talk page hasn't been archived. JDDJS - suggest you also consult with the Film Project for more opinions on this before you change it. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- It has been archived to Talk:The Artist (film)/Archive 1; you can see it in the edit history, but no link appears to have been generated. Mezigue (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- The official AMPAS database considers the film to be solely French, apparently based on its director, producer, primary production companies (IIRC one of its lesser companies was actually Belgian), and stars. That alone is notable as AMPAS considers every other Best Picture winner to be partially of either United States or United Kingdom origin. --RBBrittain (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, the film is French because it is produced by French companies. It would have been French even if it had had American actors only, had English dialogues from the beginning to the end, or/and had an American director. We have to be careful with sources (even main magazines and websites) which are not always vigilant on this point, and just pick up the information from other websites and sometimes... Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herve.toullec (talk • contribs) 18:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Artist (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100108115828/http://www.goldenglobes.org/nominations/ to http://www.goldenglobes.org/nominations/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914011421/http://www.festival-cannes.com/assets/Image/Direct/041179.PDF to http://www.festival-cannes.com/assets/Image/Direct/041179.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Category:Historical romance films
An editor keeps adding this category, but doesn't source their addition, saying that "it's obvious". Considering the issues with the lead of the article, saying it's French and in the style of a silent film, anything else along those lines would need to be backed up with reliable sources. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Boxoffice Mojo lists it as a comedy/drama, while Allmovie has the same, with the sub-genres of "Romantic Drama" and "Showbiz Comedy". Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- The only genres that should be listed are those that WP:SECONDARY WP:RSs note. Lugnuts has provided those - the IP has not. MarnetteD|Talk 13:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- The American Film Institute goes with "Comedy drama" and "Romance". "Historical films" usually have specific traits, and some basis in fact (either historical people or historical events); Allmovie provide a full description. I think The Artist is just a comedy drama with a period setting, and the "Films set in XXXX" categories take care of this. Betty Logan (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks both. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Production notes
If anyone is interested in improving the article, and especially the reference coverage, they might find this archived copy of the Production Notes (PDF) helpful. -- 109.77.236.232 (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Just seen the film. Noticed she's credited as 'Betsie' Tulloch in the credits. Renard Migrant (talk) 01:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Invoking William Powell?
The lead character resembles and seems at least partially inspired by old school Hollywood icon William Powell (1892-1984) who got his start in silent films. 2604:2D80:ED08:A00:219D:3AA1:3744:3D51 (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)