Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 19

HALT! STOP! DISCONTINUE! Before asking any questions, please read this handy FAQ to make sure your question(s) has/have not been answered. Thank you.

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

gameplay section picture

Could we have a different picture for the gameplay section? The picture of Mario begining his Final Smash doesn't represent the general gameplay. I don't have time to upload a picture myself, which is why i'm asking.Tuesday42 11:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there is one avible. Anubiz ♦ 12:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Maybe a picture from one of the posts about characters? --MunchableSandwich 12:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Can we put the Goldene imge up plese. Anubiz ♦ 12:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It's just wario Dodging a goldeen. not much exiting about that. Perhaps a pic of mario using his special move to get pack on the stage?--Demonworks

Get one under the What is Smash? update on the official site. Showing the damage percentages of the character's is a true gameplay screen. (Zojo 16:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC))

If at all possible, can we find one that's at least 300px wide? I don't know that they have any, but it'd be nice... —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 19:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Theres far too much new gameplay details to pick out a certain pic that represents all aspects. The mario picks represents one of the more major new gameplay introductions, the Final Smash, which was neither in melee or the original. I'd just leave it for now. But I suppose a better pic would be the one of mario, link, pikachu, and kirby reaching for the smash ball[1], I prefer that one a bit. If someone else finds a better pic though, of Final Smash or something else that represents the gameplay better i can be made to change. 68.195.110.145 19:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

But it's not a reason to remove an image. The article looks bad without one. --myselfalso 19:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Release date

Sora has to choke out that release date soon, since it's more than halfway done with 2007. When will the site release this info?--Demonworks

We don't know. -Sukecchi 13:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

More than likely, if its going to be this year, he would tell us at E3 --Kenny2k 03:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

For the last time: SORA IS NOT DOING IT! 165.228.218.160 07:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Request

Okay when people are discussing on here can I request two things? One: Indent your posts. If you want to see how the formatting is done, I'll direct you to the powerhouse of discussions: WP:AN/I. While not perfect, people try to indent on every post, unless they need to respond to a particular post several lines back. Resetting the indent is either done for that reason or if the indenting becomes too far in. I'm not perfect, and no one is, but at least make an effort. Second: please try to spell correctly. I'm a terrible speller, but the spelling has reached a point where it is impeding on the general understanding of what is trying to be said. I know no one cares in forums, I get that, but here, what you say may be quoted later, responded to, or read. Nothing ever disappears here. If you blank it, it is in the history and will be restored, if an admin deletes it, other admins can still see it. I'm not great, no one is, but at least make an attempt. Okay down off the soapbox now. --Clyde (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. It's getting tiring trying to decipher bad spelling and trying to find out what message goes where. (Course, I'm not one to talk about spelling. I once said "My d*ck got stuck in my playstation". Haha!) Dengarde 18:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Why is Gameplay in front of Characters

I'm not going to revert it rule because I would break itMarioman12 18:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I believe according to this it is supposed to be.--Clyde (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Mario kart stage name

I think that it should say the mario kart stages name "mario circuit". i know the name hasnt been announced but the track is called mario circuit so why shouldnt the stage name be mario circuit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.203.149 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Because that would be speculation.DurinsBane87 19:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Well it should at least say that the stage is on mario circuit, even though the stage name hasnt been confirmed.

We already Do Dengarde 19:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

actually it just says: "a Mario Kart course similar to the Figure-8 Circuit from Mario Kart DS." ill change it too: a Mario Kart course on a track called "Mario Circuit", similar to the Figure-8 Circuit from Mario Kart DS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.203.149 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Let's see: No Speculation. But, A banner says "Mario Circut" in the Trailer. Angry Sun 19:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

why did it get deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.203.149 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Because TTN just wasn't satisfied. He acts like he is an almighty god. And if things aren't going his way he does something to make it o his way. Angry Sun 20:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey, no personal attacks. If you've got a problem with TTN, take it up on his talk page instead of here. Gurko 20:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Truly It doesn't matter. If you wish to add please proceed. It won't be considered speculation if the name Mario Circuit was in the trailer, which it is. I mean, if this unofficial stage can't be given it's name fairly, why should another stage such as the Pokemon Stadium or the Halberd. The names haven't technically been "confirmed" or that nonsense. Nowadays I'm not even sure what confirmed means on Wikipedia. But back to the topic, it's no big deal. 68.195.110.145 20:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

im about to add it, but the stages section seems to be deleted. vandalizm? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.203.149 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

It has been merged to avoid more of this "place every single little stage" thing that people are doing. TTN 21:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

What makes you think that will avoid it? Knowing how people are about this article it'll happen anyways. Dengarde 21:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The speculation was supposed to have been moved a while ago when I raised the Fire Emblem issue. It had been but now it's all gone Pete Tong again. It was at a stage when only Delfino Plaza and Battlefield had been named because they're the only confirmed ones but someone's readded it all. Ashnard _Talk 21:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

IMO, this article should follow similarly to Super Smash Bros. Melee. The characters and levels should be subsections of the gameplay section. That having been said, this should only happen once we really have enough information to do that. And we won't have enough information until the game is released. --myselfalso 21:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There's a sense of pointlessness to editing here considering the stream of new information. I guess this article can only have any semblannce of something decent once the game is released. Ashnard _Talk 22:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Archive

The talk page was 66kb long. Time to archive. --myselfalso 23:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Developer?

The development section now says that the developer is Sora. First, where is the reference for this? And second, if it is true why isn't it on the "Developer(s)" part of the information box? It still reads "TBA". Unknownlight 00:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

It does? Where? ;o --Guess Who 01:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

It's gone now. It seemed to be added by 82.9.127.199 (comparison here). Unknownlight 04:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't even know why anyone thinks Sora is the developer... it's just idiocy. 07:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I remember reading (I think on the main site) that Sora was established solely for the purpose of SSBB. I think thats why. Dengarde 07:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

And maybe the fact that Sakurai founded Sora and Sakurai is currently working on Brawl.--Viridis^{talk|contributions} 07:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)