Jump to content

Islamic terrorism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Organizations: Horrible spelling/grammar/punctuation.
Noitall (talk | contribs)
The term commonly used by Westerners is Islamic, it should be accurately described and and explanation provided
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NPOV}}
{{NPOV}}
{{terrorism}}
{{terrorism}}
'''Islamist terrorism''' is [[terrorism]] that is carried out to further the political and religious ambitions of a segment of the Muslim community.
'''Islamic terrorism''' is [[terrorism]] that is carried out to further the political and religious ambitions of a segment of the Muslim community. It is a term principally used by Western news reporters, politicians and academia to describe the causes of the [[terrorist]] attacks against the [[United States]] on [[September 11, 2001]] and its aftermath, including the conflicts in [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]] and March 11, 2004 bombings [http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/03/11/madrid.anniversary/] at [[Madrid, Spain|Madrid]]'s railway station.


==Contentiousness of the Term "Islamic"==
==What kind of terrorism?==


Some people use the term "Islamic terrorism" instead of "Islamist terrorism", but this use is contentious; many [[Muslims]], particularly those supporting [[liberal movements within Islam]] do not accept that attacks on civilians can ever be justified by the Islamic religion. From this perspective, describing terrorism as "Islamic" is seen as a slur on [[Islam]]. Although "Islamic terrorism" is commonly used by Western media to describe the activity of a wide variety of groups, "Islamist terrorism" is a more accurate term and would respect the sensitivities of Muslims.
Some people prefer to use the term "Islamist terrorism" instead of the term "Islamic terrorism" because many [[Muslims]], particularly those supporting [[liberal movements within Islam]] do not accept that attacks on civilians can ever be justified by the Islamic religion. From this perspective, describing terrorism as "Islamic" is seen as a slur on [[Islam]]. Although "Islamic terrorism" is commonly used by Western media to describe the activity of a wide variety of groups, "Islamist terrorism" is a more accurate term and would respect the sensitivities of Muslims.


The term [[Islamist]], though often used generically for any political or militant group that used [[Islam]] as an identity or ideology, is used by experts in a specific meaning. Please see [[Islamism]].
The term [[Islamist]], though often used generically for any political or militant group that used [[Islam]] as an identity or ideology, is used by experts in a specific meaning. See also [[Islamism]].


==Organizations==
==Organizations==

Revision as of 01:43, 4 June 2005

Islamic terrorism is terrorism that is carried out to further the political and religious ambitions of a segment of the Muslim community. It is a term principally used by Western news reporters, politicians and academia to describe the causes of the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001 and its aftermath, including the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq and March 11, 2004 bombings [1] at Madrid's railway station.

Contentiousness of the Term "Islamic"

Some people prefer to use the term "Islamist terrorism" instead of the term "Islamic terrorism" because many Muslims, particularly those supporting liberal movements within Islam do not accept that attacks on civilians can ever be justified by the Islamic religion. From this perspective, describing terrorism as "Islamic" is seen as a slur on Islam. Although "Islamic terrorism" is commonly used by Western media to describe the activity of a wide variety of groups, "Islamist terrorism" is a more accurate term and would respect the sensitivities of Muslims.

The term Islamist, though often used generically for any political or militant group that used Islam as an identity or ideology, is used by experts in a specific meaning. See also Islamism.

Organizations

The first stated Islamist terrorist groups were the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt (from whom Hamas and Islamic Jihad split) and the Shiite Hizbullah of Lebanon. Hizbullah was the pioneer of Muslim-based suicide bombings when it used a suicide truck bomb to kill 241 Marines in US Barracks in Beirut. Later, Islamist groups adopted Hizbullah's tactic, some by just immitating them and others by joint trainings.

The most international of these groups, Al-Qaeda, also has its origins in a particular nationalist struggle: namely, rebellion against the royal family of Saudi Arabia. The Saudi regime is perceived as being too closely associated with American foreign policy, particularly through granting the United States basing rights during the first Gulf War. Al-Qaida's ideology is an extreme form of Islam as a political movement, and among its ideals are pan-Islamic unity. Thereafter, the Saudi regime was seen as insufficiently Islamic. Such a view may seem bewildering to Westerners who often cannot imagine anything more 'Islamic' than the country's Wahhabi interpretation of Islamic law, but, to Al-Qaida in particular, the world is viewed as a struggle between their extreme Islamist ideology and a secular Western ideology. This view of the world has ironically been strengthened by the War on Terror.

Terrorist view

In the view of the terrorists involved, they are defending Islam against aggression, or otherwise supporting or spreading it. Modern Islamist terrorist groups are often inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood. Some Islamist terrorist groups have employed suicide bombers, in spite of the comdemnation of suicide by Muslim religious authorities. These groups refer to suicide bomber attacks as martyrdom operations and the suicides are characterized as shohada (plural of "shahid"). The nature, extent and support for Islamist terrorism among the general Muslim population is subject to considerable debate and disagreement among Westerners.

The members of such groups are more likely to see themselves as freedom fighters rather than terrorists, as the political origins of such groups in Israel/Palestine, Soviet-occupied Afghanistan, Chechnya and most recently post-Saddam Iraq are often connected to demands for statehood and nationalist self-determination.

Other Muslim views

Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, the general manager of Al-Arabiya said: "It is a certain fact that not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims."

Muslim scholars in North America in a statement just after 9/11: "We encourage Muslim medical professionals and Muslim relief agencies to assist in whatever possible way with humanitarian and relief efforts both locally and nationally. Moreover, we urge people of diverse religious traditions, faith groups and spiritual expressions, including Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and members of other communities, to share their grief and sorrow together as one family, the human family."

Historical roots

A medieval precedent of modern Islamist terrorism may have been the Hashshashin, an Islamic (Nizari) group from the Middle Ages that sent assassins against Crusader and Islamic rulers opposing them. Their lair was the Alamut fortress.

Verdict of the Qu'ran

The Qur'an, the highest source of authority in Islam, vehemently denounces the killing of any person who is not guilty of at least one of two crimes:

"Whosoever killed a person - unless it be for killing a person or for creating disorder in the land - it shall be as if he killed all mankind; and whoso saved a life, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind." (5:32)

According to this verse of the Qur'an, if one human being is killed who is

1) Not guilty of murdering another person;

2) Not guilty of causing disorder/strife;

It would be the equivalent to the massacre of the entire human race, which is an inconceivably barbaric crime, and a monumental sin. This verse makes it clear and unequivocal who is a legitimate target, and who is not.

Other possibly relevant Qur'anic statements include:

2.190-1: "Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith."

This verse is traditionally interpreted (eg Ibn Kathir) as forbidding attacks on non-combatants; see al-Baqara for further details.

With reference to the Hypocrites (munafiqin), a group at Madina which are said to have pretended to be Muslims while secretly supporting their enemies, the Qur'an says:

[4.89-91] They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper. Except those who reach a people between whom and you there is an alliance, or who come to you, their hearts shrinking from fighting you or fighting their own people; and if Allah had pleased, He would have given them power over you, so that they should have certainly fought you; therefore if they withdraw from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allah has not given you a way against them. You will find others who desire that they should be safe from you and secure from their own people; as often as they are sent back to the mischief they get thrown into it headlong; therefore if they do not withdraw from you, and (do not) offer you peace and restrain their hands, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them; and against these We have given you a clear authority.

US State Department's list of Islamist terrorist groups

See also