User talk:MONGO

Archives Archive 1 (January 2005 to June 2005) Archive 2 (July 2005 to October 2005) Archive 3 (November 2005) Archive 4 (December 2005) Archive 5 (January 2006) Archive 6 (February 2006) Archive 7 (March 2006) Archive 8 (April 2006) Archive 9 (May 2006) Archive 10 (June 2006) Archive 11 (July/August 2006) Archive 12 (September 2006) Archive 13 (October 2006) Archive 14 (November 2006) Archive 15 (December 2006) Archive 16 (January 2007) Archive 17 (February 2007) Archive 18 (March 2007) Archive 19 (April 2007) Archive 20 (May 2007) Archive 21 (June 2007) Archive 22 (July 2007)

---

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2

Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 03:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On August 10, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ben Kuroki, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Good to see you agian MONGO. Happy editing, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Good job MONGO --rogerd 16:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.--MONGO 18:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Kuroki

Thanks for the PBS tip. I'd like to watch it.Rlevse 18:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Accusations of mounting personal attacks

MONGO, here, you accused me of mounting personal attacks against you. When I pressed you on what those personal attacks consisted of, you again accused me of attacking you. When I pressed you further, you responded:

After the other admin removed it, did you put it back? Okay, thanks

So twice today you have accused me of attacking you and have refused to substantiate your charges. Until such time as you can substantiate your accusation, please stop accusing me of attacking you. — goethean ॐ 21:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Check the rfa...the link to the frivilous complaint you filed at AN/I on me is there...if you still don't understand what userpages are and are not to be used for, you have learned nothing...so check this for further guidance. Thanks.--MONGO 21:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Further...[1]--MONGO 21:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Those links don't answer my question. All you do is accuse and evade. Please stop accusing me of attacking you personally untuil such time as you can substantiate the charges. Thanks. — goethean ॐ 22:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

If you can't click those links and read the multiple comments there condemning your misuse of your userspace to attack myself and others, then I cannot help you.--MONGO 22:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crockspot

You forgot to sign a comment [2]. —AldeBaer 17:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain

from making changes to my userpage describing myself without consensus. VanTucky ^(talk) 18:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

There is no need for consensus as far as userpages go...either use them for what they are supposed to be used for, or find another website to edit.--MONGO 18:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

MONGO, please do something for me

MONGO, I would like to see you run for admin. Of course, it will fail, but just for kicks, just to see how many people's heads will explode with their SUPERSONIC STRONG OPPOSEs. :) The Evil Spartan 19:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• I would be proud to make the nomination. - Crockspot 19:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks guys...but I am on a lot of enemies lists. Right now, I am pretty angry about this website.--MONGO 22:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Been there, believe me. But don't abandon the asylum to the lunatics. Raymond Arritt 22:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I am beginning to think that this website is dominated by anarchists and morons, not serious contributors to the effort of writng an encyclopedia. My desire to edit this website is really low at this point...all I feel like doing is tracking down all the socks and banned editors and getting then blocked.--MONGO 00:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I've been wondering about applying to the august body myself. Perhaps we should co-ordinate cos I think either of us would be equally controversial, and we havent seen much of that since Gracenotes. I understand your not liking wikipedia that much. You'd get my vote based on your contribs right now anyway, FWIW, SqueakBox 00:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

'Friends lists' and civility

I saw your post about Smedley's 'friends list'. I'm in a similar situation, where despite my plain request (and my removal of his name from my talk page after a long lull in our interaction) TDC has refused to remove my name (and my name alone) for months on a 'friends list' of his own [3]. If you could help TDC to understand your viewpoint that excessive use of such lists can be perceived by some as stalking, and work to have him remove my name from his 'user' page, I'd be grateful... since there's no call for it whatsoever. If you'd like to see links about the context, I'm happy to provide them. Thanks, MONGO. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

You rock and my support for you remains as strong as ever. Be well. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll look around and see who else is linking like that. I know Bauder does, but we assume his rationale is due to his arbcom work. Lowly editors such as me don't need to link to anything but the articles.--MONGO 00:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

When one is in the midst of conflicts, it can be helpful to maintain useful links to specific diffs, but I imagine one could just as easily keep their notes off-wiki, to avoid undue escalation and misperception of insult. I would fully back a decision based on the general principle that such lists are more often used as attacks than as assets for conflict resolution. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)