User talk:Mzajac

Start a new discussion topic
Archives
User talk:Mzajac/2004 User talk:Mzajac/2005 User talk:Mzajac/2006 User talk:Mzajac/2007

Talk:Đ

I've started yet another move proposal at Talk:Đ that you might like to comment on. --Ptcamn 16:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Unicode Latin

Template:Unicode Latin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — ✉Hello World! 06:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Microformats

Thank you for your interest in the Geo microformat. You might also like to see, or join Wikipedia:WikiProject Microformats. Perhaps you could kindly mention the project, and Geo, on the Ukraninan Wikipedia? Andy Mabbett 16:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

File:Eastereggs.jpg

Best! --Irpen

WikiProject Ukraine

Hey, I noticed that you were an inactive member of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Ukrainian subdivisions. In case you're unaware, the Ukrainian subdivisions WikiProject was merged into a broader Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine. You automatically became a member. However, you will have to decide yourself whether you want to take part in it. Please visit the WikiProject Ukraine page and let us know whether you want to be a member. Thank you. — Alex^(T|C|E) 00:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Insurgency weapon verify tag

You tagged the insurgency weapon article with a verify tag quite some time ago, and I was wondering if you'd mind taking a look at the current article and seeing if you think the tag is still justified, and if so, what areas you'd like to see provided with more references. Here is a link to the differences between the latest edit to date and the point at which you tagged the article. scot 14:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Yoghurt

I want to start out by saying I'm really sorry that this happened - I did my best to stop it (since the discussion has happened so many times), but sadly I have been overruled by 4 people who are obsessed with name changing (regardless of whether or not I agree with them). There is a new debate on the Yoghurt talk page about the move - I just felt it would be best if most people who had voted in the past knew about this.danielfolsom 00:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi There

Hi. Thanx for your clarification on the Template:AFV Page. I hadn't seen the dates on the page. I was wondering then if we should not replace the box with the weapons box, and delete the AFV box?? Shall I start to replace the boxes with the weapons one?? Thanks and Cheers. Sniperz11 18:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Get this book

http://www.amazon.com/T-34-Mythical-Weapon-Robert-Michulec/dp/0978109104/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-0233488-7150445?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1180028712&sr=1-1

I know how much you like the t-34 so buy this book or borrow it Lookhereandbuy 17:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Stadia article

Since you did some work on Stadia (method), do you have any input on this proposal? scot 17:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Unicode sharps and flats for music

Display of Unicode sharps and flats (in Internet Explorer) has been an issue for some time. We are trying to create a template similar to Template:Unicode and Template:IPA that is specific to music. I just wanted to give you a heads up since you were very active in the discussions for the Unicode and IPA templates. If you can offer guidance on font selection or other suggestions please visit the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (music)#Unicode template for sharps and flats or see the template itself at Template:Accidental (please note this may eventually move to the namespace Template:Music)--Dbolton 06:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Transliteration policy

As an inactive member of WikiProject Ukraine and a contributor to articles relating to Ukraine, you are invited to participate in the discussion about transliteration of Ukrainian words. I would appreciate your participation. Discussion is located here. Thank you. — Alex^(U|C|E) 18:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

CSS (disambiguation)

Thanks for cleaning this up per MoS:DP. Just a minor thing I noticed: you removed the emboldening of the pseudo-section headings, but MoS:DP actually says they should be bold.

Thanks, Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _{talk contrib} 21:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Also the primary use (where CSS redirects) should be in its own seperate lede paragraph (even if the existing one was a bit rambly). —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _{talk contrib} 21:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Sukhoi Su-25

As you are one of the contributors to the Sukhoi Su-25 article, please feel free to leave your comment/opinion at the WPMILHIST A-class review of the article. Thanks! --Eurocopter tigre 14:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Your Edit

Could you perhaps explain to me the reasoning behind your reversion? Perhaps next time you could, include a reason in your edit summary. Regards, Dfrg.msc 08:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

And this one? Dfrg.msc 08:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, sorry for my tone earlier, I was a little frustrated that my edits were reverted without clear explication. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 00:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Code2000 DRV

Recently the article on the Unicode font Code2000 was deleted, with no informed comment. That deletion is being reviewed, and if you wish to do so you may comment here. --KSmrq^T 07:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

T-70 tank

It's states clearly in the article that T-70 was used after the war.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperTank17 (talk • contribs)

[response at User talk:SuperTank17#T-70 tank —MZ]

History of the Soviet Union

I've made some announcements ([1][2][3][4][5][6]) and I'm sure there will be folks who have something to say, so I'm starting this topic here. Sorry that I haven't been around much to discover the situation earlier. I'm afraid I still don't have much time to devote to Wikipedia editing, so I won't be able to be a big help, but the state of History of the Soviet Union is just unacceptable, and I hope it won't be too much work to reassemble a good summary article with material from the detailed articles.

Main discussion belongs at Talk:History of the Soviet Union#Fake TOC.

Feel free to let me know what you think here, though. Regards, comrades. —Michael Z. 2007-07-21 19:38 Z

flag template documentation - feedback requested

I've just updated the documentation of template:flagicon. Can you please take a quick look and let me know what you think? I'm also going to make similar updates to template:flag, template:flagcountry, as well as the main project page. Thanks for any feedback, Andrwsc 19:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Scientific transliteration table format

What value does your background colouring of rows in scientific transliteration add? Mine highlighted those letters that have varying transcriptions among languages. Christoph Päper 15:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[Response at user talk:Crissov#Scientific transliteration table format —MZ]

Request to move to kyiv

Hello,

I have set up a request to move the page Kiev to Kyiv.

I have outlined four key reasons for doing so in the discussion section of the page.

Looking through the archives, I saw that you had contributed to this page earlier. I would like to hear what you have to say on this topic.

Thank you

Horlo 02:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Horlo

:), God, yes. Did not we indeed bang on the same drum (and on each other). If only folks helped us with content instead. Truly agree. Said same things time and again. Cheers, --Irpen 05:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

More global head-banging

I would be interested in your opinion on my too verbose and desperate but still novel proposal posted at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus/Proposed decision#Proposing a novel solution that may actually work. It was peanuts when it were just 5-10 of us arguing. But now it is a mess. I am looking forward for constructive feedback. Cheers, --Irpen 05:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Oi, that looks like a lot to catch up on. I can't commit right now, but I'll leave the link in a browser tab and see what I can do. Again, real life getting in the way. Regards. —Michael Z. 2007-07-30 05:44 Z

45th Rifle Division (Soviet Union)

Hi Mzajac, You may remember me from the help you gave me with the translation of the Military of Ukraine page. I've moved on to do some Soviet formations, and have machine-translated some Russian webpages, but they haven't come out comepletely. Would you mind taking a look at the 45th Rifle Division and translating the odd word that hasn't come out, and, when you can, also look at Twenty-Second Army (Soviet Union) and Twenty-Ninth Army (Soviet Union)? Thanks very much for your help. Cheers Buckshot06 12:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Highlighted dates on Winnipeg page

Did you want to highlight Winnipeg's founding on the Winnipeg article? I noticed you put it back in right away. I followed the link to that specific date and wasn't sure if the founding of the city warranted a mention as an event. It isn't listed now. What do you think? jdobbin 18:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I'm always looking to improve the Winnipeg and Manitoba articles.

Yes, I saw Walker's article. He had contacted me at home about who Wikipedia and thought I was an administrator. I gave him some instruction for about an hour and said if he wanted an insiders account to speak to you or one of the other Winnipeg administrators. Don't know if he actually did get a hold of you. He really didn't know know much about how it worked at first but said Free Press editors often looked on Wiki as a reference as they did research on a subject. jdobbin 18:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Politics of Russia

Hi, Michael! Regarding this, I just thought I'd let you know that "Russia" is just as formal as "the Russian Federation". The Constitution lists both variants as equivalent, so you might want to re-phrase your edit (I'm not sure how though). Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Your changes in AFV list by country

If that is a list by origin many countries won't have any AFVs there at all! And if you're so determinated to do so (and ruin what I've been working on for mouths) then why you only removed the Archer from list of Polish vehicles? More or less than 70% of the vehicles there are not of Polish origin.

Please respond or leave my work alone. I think we should talk about this before you make any kind of dramatic changes to said article.

BTW this isn't meant to be offensive. It's just that the part of article your about to dramatically change (at least I suspect you of that) is one I spent most of my time editing Wikipedia on. Also I was sending polite "diplomatic" messages to other people and they usually didn't respond and I worked too hard on that article to just give it up that easily.

[replied at user talk:SuperTank17#List of armoured fighting vehicles by country —MZ]

re:List of armoured fighting vehicles by country

I like your idea and I already created a separate list. The name is List of armoured fighting vehicles used by Polish I will now make sure Polish vehicles only will remain on list of armoured fighting vehicles by country. You can take care of other nations.

Thanks for responding.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperTank17 (talk • contribs).

New name for that article has been suggested here.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  22:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kyriakos 08:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Warning

I warn you from making any changes without proper reason to the Modern tanks template. I had to report the vandalism by you. Keep this in mind before the unnecessary reverts that you make. Chanakyathegreat 15:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Very happy to hear that you had taken the right step. Let them decide who is the vandal? Chanakyathegreat 03:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on Template:Modern tanks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. GDonato (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Chanakyathegreat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has also been blocked. GDonato (talk) 13:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack

Did I call you a Pakistani. I know from the start you are Ukranian as mentioned in your userpage, then how can I call you a Pakistani. From the discussion, I had found that you are good at accusations. Chanakyathegreat 06:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Your edits in List of armoured vehicles by country

Why did you deleted some of the vehicles of Polish origin?— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperTank17 (talk • contribs)

I removed a lot of stuff from that list. Which ones do you mean? —Michael Z. 2007-08-13 14:01 Z

UKP

...great edits on the UKP page! --Soman 14:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Cheers. —Michael Z. 2007-08-15 14:20 Z

Proposed deletion of Motorised

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{prod}} template has been placed on Motorised, by TexasAndroid (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Grim Reaper Bot 07:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Airtrooper Rank

Hi, just a quick one on the Airtrooper rank, I was an Airtrooper in the British Army for 4 years, a members of the AAC for 15 years and retired this year from the British Army after 22 years. Happy Days :)

The abbreviation for Airtrooper is "Atpr" I explained this in the minor edit text. The fact that Airtrooper is actually one word, to have a capital "A" and "T" doesn't make sence. I hope this amemdment could be changed.

While I am on the subject, I appreciate the change to the link to my user account (the rules); but I wish to publish my work on the rank of Airtrooper as a main subject and not in my user area. How do I do this. That said it is still a work in progress :)

Thanks in advance for your time :)

[replied at user talk:Manblog —MZ]

No Problem, and thanks very much for your help. I am stuck a little: I have created a page Airtrooper and Airtrooper (Rank) I need Admin to look into it and decide what should happen; which one to delete? Ignore this it's been rectified! Again, many thanks Wayne

Thanks for looking over my work and making it more presentable (I am learning quickly); I am looking further into the history of the 'Air' part of Airtrooper. It is very much based on the Parachute Regiment, Glider Pilot Regiment and the SAS. It is all very interesting. :) More to come!

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 16:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Re !

Sorry, got into a bad habit. You should see my contributions list its "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" all the way down. --Climax-Void ^{Chat or My Contributions}

Valuyev Circular

Sorry, Michael, I don't really have time to scrutinize the whole translation, but I did read through all of it with interest and found it to be a well-translated piece with no major flaws. Keep up the good work! Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Picture issue

Hi Mzajac! I would appreciate it if you could drop in and give your opinion on the dispute here. I believe my arguments are resonable and the use of this picture as fair use is justified. Zaindy87 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: SineBot

I saw the post you made on User talk:SineBot. The diff you provided me is from the 20th, and the problem has already been Fixed since v1.1.2 (the 22nd), which was an issue with your (and other users') signatures containing   instead of whitespace. You do make a good point on the {{tilde}} warnings, however, and I'll look into adding some diff information on to the end of them so that people will be able to find them more easily. If you're still having problems, please let me know on my talk page (I less frequently check the bot's). Cheers. =) --slakr ^(talk) 02:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kiev, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horlo (talk • contribs) 06:28, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kiev. For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 08:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Re: Please cite your sources

Acually this one comes from Polish Wikipeida. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperTank17 (talk • contribs) 19:38, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Re: List of modern infantry-related terms and acronyms and List of modern AFV and artillery-related terms and acronyms. You seem to be the only one who expressed an opinion on the merge (and a rather logical one at that). Would you be interested in performing the merge? It's been almost a year now... Pairadox 01:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[merged at Glossary of military abbreviations —MZ]

Template help?

Hi,

I totally stole a template from you (the Soviet armoured fighting vehicles one) and am trying to help out these guys, conversation here. Is there a way of getting this image at the top of this template? I passed my limits several hours ago, I'm improvising.

Thanks,

WLU 20:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi,

The template now has an image, I was wondering if you could have a gander at the coding to see if there's any way to clean it up; since I was translating the templates without a dictionary, I don't know what I'm doing and if it could be done more easily or cleanly. Thanks, WLU 20:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Winnipeg article

The reason I put the scrolling bar and small print reference list in was to standardize with what the Calgary page is doing. Is that not correct? I am seeing more article pages using the scrolling bar once the notes reach 30 or so in number.

The last time I heard, the Winnipeg article was overly long. I have moved some of the article to sub-pages but citations account for a lot of space. jdobbin 17:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[replied at user talk:jdobbin#Scrolling fields —MZ]

Ukrainian name

Michael, I am very impressed by an amount of time you put in the post to talk:Kiev/Naming. I mostly ignore this whole "debate", now, thankfully, out of the way of productive users. Speaking of Ukrainian names, could you move this? This certainly won't ignite any controversy. The current redirect has a history and can't be moved without deletion. Thanks, --Irpen 01:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I actually managed to do it without spending too much time, and the seeing the search results satisfied my own curiosity.

I just felt I had to address the continued presentation of obvious mistruth. I don't know who it actually aims to convince, but the overwhelming volume could fool another editor who actually assumes good faith and doesn't take the time to examine so many false claims.

Moved the article. Cheers.

T-34

Hi Mzajac, just been reading through the T-34 article for the first time. Just wanted to congratulate you on how good it is - including funny things like pink tanks and vehicles that spent 56 years at the bottom of a bog! Congrats again, Buckshot06 10:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Tank ID

Hey Mzajac, long time no talk. I was hoping you could ID a picture of a tank I took while I was away a few months ago. Judging by its looks, I am almost convinced that it's a T-72 although one of the military men over there I believe told me otherwise. Thanks for your help, --Marshal Bagramyan 21:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[replied at user talk:MarshallBagramyan#Stepanakert tank memorial —MZ]

Kyiv/Kiev

They are discussing Kyiv/Kiev spelling again at Talk:Kiev/naming. Maybe you may be interested. Bandurist 22:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Well, it looks like the appearance of some new participants has improved the discussion in some ways. I may keep an eye on it, but I don't have anything to add just yet. —Michael Z. 2007-09-18 02:40 Z

Berehynia

Hi, I noticed that you are interested in topics related to Ukraine. I would appreciate if you offered your opinion on the subject of the article Berehynia. The discussion takes place at the article's talk page. Thanks in advance. --Hillock65 11:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Transliteration issue

Hello, I was told that you would know the answer to this question. The article Hryhory Loboda is spelled differently in the article itself (Hryhoriy), and in the Hetmans template. Because if this, his name appears as a red link in the template. I know Григорій can be transliterated in many different ways, and I am not sure which transliteration would be prefered. Could you fix it? Ostap 19:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation and for fixing it. From now I will follow your example. Thanks, Ostap 19:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I believe I understand. So for the Alexander Dovzhenko article, would I be correct to add Oleksandr after the Ukrainian in the first line? Ostap 19:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

HP - Harry Potter

I want to emphasize that I was not threatening to fight or unnecessarily edit. I was stating that for the sake connivance (since there is an obvious demand for it) and for maintaining less revisions on Wikipedia, it should be added. Please to not harass/blame users. Thank you,140.146.202.180 07:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

HP - Harry Potter

I want to emphasize that I was not threatening to fight or unnecessarily edit. I was stating that for the sake connivance (since there is an obvious demand for it) and for maintaining less revisions on Wikipedia, it should be added. Please to not harass/blame users. Thank you,140.146.202.180 07:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I can appreciate your honesty that you do not agree. I agree that leaving a paragraph in the disambiguation was neither a solution nor the best idea. However, I want to point out that there are two parties in this dispute: Those 'adding' and those 'removing'.

The pool of those removing is much small and is basically a set group of people that have members joining slowly. They are devoted to the cause that HP douse not mean nor imply Harry Potter. Some may argue that is because these 'removers' are not a fan/don't like/never read Harry Potter. This assumption is basically irrelevant although it may play a role in the motive of removing.

The pool of those who are adding are an entirely random group of people that contains an infinite number of members. Users join this group when they search for HP expecting to find a reference to link to their topic they are looking for, in this case Harry Potter. This may because the user truly refers to Harry Potter as HP, is lazy and thinks it will be in the obvious, or is clueless how to spell Harry Potter and expects it in the obvious. In any case people are expecting Harry Potter to be in this so-called obvious location. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to stop the 'adders', as it is an entirely random group of visitors that notice Harry Potter is not on this seemingly obvious page.

The 'adders' will not be aware of the so-called consensus that the 'adders' should not add Harry Potter. Since there are numerous adds for Harry Potter, and it keeps on repeating, I want to argue that we should add it as a general public consensus that HP could stand for Harry Potter, despite the fact that it is "incited". It is an assumed abbreviation. It will be easier to control/notify the experienced Wikipedia editors that it is alright that Harry Potter is there, than notify the average person not to add Harry Potter.

I believe I understand you logic for not having Harry Potter on disambiguation, I hope you understand my logic of why I believe it should be there. If I myself had not run into this page expecting Harry Potter to be on this page, I would definitely be on the other side of the table. I hope the next question is whether the Harry Potter link will go the book series, or to the character.
Thank you for your time,140.146.202.180 07:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Spaceeba

Spaceeba Tavareesh. Now could you be so kind to do the same for this tank. See, when I went there, the military guys I was with disputed with the fact that the tank I previously showed you was not the same as this one. And mind you, these guys weren't newbs or anything: one of them happened to be a video photographer who had accompanied men in nearly every firefight and no doubt had served in the Soviet Army. I can believe if they meant that the T-72 was a different type but this tank here is undoubtedly a T-72 also isn't it? Much thanks, --Marshal Bagramyan 06:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Wanna bet?

... for a bottle of what that this won't fly? Are you serious? What would Horlo be doing then all this time? :) --Irpen 06:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

No bets! Let's just see what happens. —Michael Z. 2007-09-26 07:05 Z