User talk:Zetawoof

Archives
1 (Pre-2006)
2 (2006)

Xbox Handheld

You participated in an AfD for Xbox Handheld. I re-wrote the article as a stub and provided sources. Please take a look at the re-written article Xbox Handheld and comment at the AfD discussion [1] Alan Shatte 22:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Good idea, jimfbleak 09:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Eep! "Someone Set Up Us the Mop!"

Thanks for the support on RfA!

With the RfA complete and over, and a day to recover on top, I finally feel able to click a few buttons and write a few comments. Of those, there's about a dozen editors I hadn't come across before, whom I particularly want to write a comment to.

As a friend and also as an editor, you wrote. As both those - thanks. I hope to live up to the best of 'em all.

I've set myself up a user subpage to post questions when I need to check "what would other users do here?". I'll probably have a lot of those early on. If you want to watchlist User:FT2/Advice sought, I'd value it :) it's my first step in ensuring this new access gets used for the best when circumstances arise, and to seek advice from others.

Separate from all that, I look forward to seeing you round. What subject areas are you working on these days?

Keep in touch, happy editing in 2007, and once again - many thanks! :) FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 02:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Stoic atarian

I didn't block User:Stoic atarian, i only protected his talk page for keep removal of warnings. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 15:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject updates

• I have done some updating to the WP:SCN, added some new articles, added a "to do" list to the top of the project, and fixed up some categories and assessment stuff. I suggest we should all pick one article at a time, or at most two, to work on bringing up to Featured Article status. You could give input on the project's talk page... Smee 21:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
  • Also, a Userbox for project members, {{User Scientology project}} Smee 21:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC).

Death of Marylin Monroe

I just want you to know that I dont appreciate you removing the articles deletion page when There was not even more than a few comments yet.I feel very strongly that the nomination should be put and unless you can prove that there was a consensus than it may return Rodrigue 17:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

As I noted in the closing comments, AFD stands for "Articles for Deletion", not "Articles for Merging". As neither you nor anyone else who commented expressed an interest in deleting the article outright, there's no point in discussing whether it should be deleted. Merging it to Marilyn Monroe would be a decision made through discussion on the two articles' talk pages. Zetawoof^(ζ) 19:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Kafka article

Hello,

Thank you for fixing the Franz Kafka Article. I don't have a clue what happened. I went in and did some text editing (like I've done many, many times before with other Articles) and, when I Saved it, the whole bottom of the Article was gone. I tried to fix it by reverting the edit but I couldn't get it to work. What could have caused this? Anyway, thanks again.

El dummo (aka Michael David 10:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC))

What web browser are you using? If it's Firefox, what extensions? Some older browsers, and buggy Firefox extensions, will truncate articles longer than 32 kilobytes of text. Zetawoof^(ζ) 20:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. I'm a bit computer challenged, so bear with me. I'm using a rather old version of Internet Explorer which I know I need to upgrade and have been procrastinating on doing. It's time!

Thanks, again, and I'll be more careful with the long Articles for a while.

Michael David 21:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Akita shepherd

Hey Zetawoof! or whatever your name is(Zeta by the way is a female name in Greek, are you male or female?) Is that what you do? Roaming in Wikipedia all day trying to find which articles you can axe? Haven't you got anythin better to do in your teen-illiterate life??Is that how you become an administrator? I ve got a suggestion for you. Instead of trying to delete other people's work why dont you write a line for an article, or two? Shame on you! Pardon my english, i am only Greek! Idiot! Wikipedia needs more writers not more beraucrats, workers, not commanders (its got enough of them, simply coz everybody wants to be one) My article deleted by an animal? whats this world coming to Sorry about my tone but your idiocy has made me angry

ps I havent made the breed up and the article is gdamn sourced

user:Spyros Pantenas

In that case, can you:

• Reply on the AFD discussion page,
• Expand the article to explain why this crossbreed is special, and
• Provide sources that say something substantive about the breed?

Right now, the article just defines the breed as an Akita/GSD cross and claims that they are "quite an interesting mix". Zetawoof^(ζ) 23:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Giza.jpg

Hello, I've been trying to create maps of Egyptian cities using Google Maps. I reference this on the appropriate pages (for Image:Giza.jpg , please see Giza). If I use Google Maps to generate the original map, then I make modifications to the map, does this still count as a Google Maps copyright? And if the answer is yes, how can I appropriately cite the source in this case? Or is it totally prohibited? Thanks in advance for your help. --Lanternix 05:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No - no matter what modifications are made to the image, it remains property of both Google and anyone else they're licensing the images from, so it's invalid for use in Wikipedia. You can, however, often get free images from NASA World Wind - be very careful, though, as only certain layers are public domain. (Their website says that the Global Mosaic, Blue Marble, and USGS layers are PD.) For more information, see the World Wind wiki. Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help. I began a new style of maps for Egypt using an empty map that a friend of mine generated, then I put the names of cities etc on it. For an example, please see Image:AbuQirqas.jpg and let me know if this is now appropriate. Thanks again for your help. --Lanternix 15:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Quantum Realm

With due respect. Why did you do a redirect of this article just as I was composing it? No discussion, nothing. The speed is rather breathtaking. But, rather against the rules and guidelines. As for "notability", this is a subject that gets about 30K returns on a Google search. The subject matter is not included in the Quantum mechanics article.Pproctor 01:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to revert, or redirect it somewhere else. I'm just not sure that there's anything that can be said about the "quantum realm" that isn't already said either at quantum mechanics or somewhere else - it's not really an independent topic. Zetawoof^(ζ) 01:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalised page

Someone replaced your user page with "Beware, this user fucks animals". I reverted it for you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 20:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. (I'm honestly surprised I don't catch more flak than I do.) Zetawoof_(ζ) 22:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Why do you say that? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 01:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The use of zeta in his name. Look it up someday.  :-) (Hi, Zetawoof. *secret-handshake-or-something*) -- Coren ^(talk) 16:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

RapidWeaver

1. My changes to RapidWeaver contain useful content. 2. This article was in the process of being created in multiple saves, and was deleted way to soon after the initial creation. 3. IT IS NOT ADVERTISING FOR ANY COMPANY. ESPECIALLY NOT BLATANT ADVERTISING. I am not promoting any company, product, group, service, or person. I am unaffiliated. It is intended to be all inclusive resource. 4. IT IS NOT SPAM. Taylorluker 16:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Um, I think you're confused. All I did was close the MFD discussion after the page was deleted. I neither saw the page in question nor did anything do it. Zetawoof_(ζ) 19:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Burrito

hello I wasn't vandalizing...Is not fair..you show the American style...but not the traditional MExican style..Please...you white Americans take everything and try to mess it up with your own crap...please....to be fair please put up the traditional Mexican version.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.70.64.242 (talk • contribs).

So write something about Mexican-style burritos. I will agree that there's a definite lack of information about Mexican burritos in the current article, but deleting half the article doesn't solve that problem. Zetawoof_(ζ) 01:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Images Image:Felidae.jpg and Image:Bearspecies.jpg

It is varied, some photographies I took them in the zoological one from zacango in Mexico and others (because in that zoological one they do not have many animal species) I extracted images from Web pages that they indicate "under free licenses" for complement my bearspecies.jpg and felidae.jpg files. Sorry. I do not write english very well. I wait for you could understand the message. Greetings Sergiodlarosa 21:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm continuing the discussion on your talk page. Zetawoof_(ζ) 21:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

Just thought I'd say hi (^_^)

PolarWolf has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the husky! :)

WikiProject Furry

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board. Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing! You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 23:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about that. won't happen again --PolarWolf 01:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. It's one of those non-obvious things, I guess. Zetawoof_(ζ) 01:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reverting

Reverting me on Deletion review isn't fair dinkum, mate.... g'day to ya, fella. You drunk today or something?? --SpiritDispenser300x3 22:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I think you know just as well as I do that listing George W. Bush for deletion review is purely disruptive. Zetawoof_(ζ) 22:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Deep brain stimulation

Thanks for the cleanup; I'm embarrassed that I didn't notice it sooner.[2] SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Cockeranian

I see you want that article to be deleted. Well I firmly disagree, as it is a very notable hybrid dog. And however unreliable The American Canine Hybrid Club may be, the information in reconition to them is still of substancial importance! thanks, 4.244.66.202 01:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

You Have a Spoofer

Just wanted to let you know that I blocked a spoofer of yours. Seems like they came back to an article you were watching.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Yep, I noticed (and reported on WP:UFA, too). Seems a vandal on that page is impersonating editors that get in their way. Zetawoof_(ζ) 00:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Van Ryswyk Theory

Hello, here at OneStep Studios, we are responsible for the creation of the "Van Ryswyk Theory" page. We please ask that you remove the nonsense tag from the page and that you let it progress normally and deletion free. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneStepStudios (talk • contribs) 08:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Um, no. It's utter nonsense. Zetawoof_(ζ) 10:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

poodle hybrids

We seem to be losing the battle rapidly on several of these. People seem to think that any source is a sufficient source to prove notability. I feel your pain on the earlier group AFD. I thought users were reasonable enough to notice when articles are complete crap that serve as free advert space for unscrupulous breeders. Guess not. VanTucky ^(talk) 19:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Videu

It's a courtesy to warn the page creator that you've tagged a page for deletion. It gives them a chance to improve it, quite apart from anything else. --Dweller 12:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Furry fandom

I'm not sure it's acceptable practice to remove comments from Talk:Furry fandom as you've done. I agree, they are probably just trolling, but as long as the comments are not obvious vandalism, WP:AGF obligates us to treat them as reasonable edits and give them the benefit of the doubt. Yes, I also reviewed WP:DNFT and we are in a gray area which policy should apply here. But simply removing the comments could be taken as practicing the sort of selective editing and censorship that furry wikipedians are accused of, and for that reason I'm inclined to favor WP:AGF. --Mwalimu59 16:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The way I figure it, the chance that the comments were actually intended to be constructive criticism is next to nil. Comments soliciting help to make the article "incriminate those people" and expose "the bestiality of furries" are pretty clearly not intended to be constructive. Zetawoof_(ζ) 20:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Ambox border breakage when near images

Hi Zetawoof. We now have a solution to the "ambox border breakage when near images" problem. Take a look at Template talk:Ambox#Suggestion by Dispenser and tell us there if it works in your browser too.

--David Göthberg 12:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Oregon primate rescue

A page I just created is marked for deletion and I have contested it. I used content from another wiki page, which I have since deleted. The other issue was the use of "copywritten" material from the Oregon Primate Website. Since the text is material I wrote for the organization, there needn't be any issues about that. - And just in case there are any other issues pertaining to the content, you will notice I have listed in the categories other primate rescue and education facilities. (There are 12 other organizations similar to mine with entries in wikipedia)Nickleby98661 23:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)