Furry fandom was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Furry fandom is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
It's actually a very good documentary, but given it's produced by fans that might run into WP:PRIMARY issues. We probably need a more broad consensus before using it to cite anything. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
@HandThatFeeds: No, I personally think you're stretching WP:PRIMARY to breaking point. Let me draw some analogies: we wouldn't say that a documentary about a media franchise, e.g. Sonic, Mario, etc., was a primary source if it were directed/produced by a fan. We'd say it's a WP:BIASEDSOURCE, biased towards the quality of those franchises, but reliable for facts that aren't "Sonic is a fun game". This is similar to what I wrote about Flayrah in § Semi-protected edit request on 13 June 2020 (my self-reply). We have to be careful primarily not to use either Flayrah or the documentary to source things that are too obscure for general readers and not to source it to say things like "furry is not sexual" or "furry fandom is harmless fun" or whatever, but there's a lot we can get out of it beyond that. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please alwaysping! 16:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't think it's a breaking point, but more that we should be quite careful how we use the documentary for any factual citations. I agree, we're better off using clearly secondary sources for controversial statements, and mostly use this documentary for basics or for things not covered in other media, ie. the original creator of "fursonas" is first identified in this documentary.
(As a disclaimer, I've been a furry since 1994, when I first learned the fandom existed.) — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 16:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Note the refideas I placed at the top of this Talk page are all third-party reviews of this very documentary, and can easily be used to expand on what is already in this article if necessary. Jalen Folf(talk) 17:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2020
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like added that the basis of being a furry is like anthropomorphic animals. (link a wiki page for anthropomorphic) Being a furry starts with liking anthropomorphic animals and ends with if you consider yourself one. Mixxup (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)