Talk:Furry fandom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good article nomineeFurry fandom was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 11, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
September 19, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
September 3, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2022[edit]

I'd like to update the photo under Sociological Aspects to this one:

Two fursuiters at Midwest Furfest.jpg

Gravellyplain (talk) 00:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Sorry!--TZubiri (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The terms "Furry" and "Fursonas" as an insult.[edit]

In my own the offensive version of the terms "Furry" and "Fursonas" is considered very homophobic and right-wing, and used it on politics, because of this, they probably resembled them as liberals and leftists, and this needs to stop! And I wish someone would create a term called "Right-wing fanboy(s)", to resemble right-wing extremists! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TakeHaru03 (talkcontribs) 05:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I follow what you're saying here - a language barrier, perhaps. Are you saying that there are some who use these terms as insults and that those who do this tend to be homophobic and/or far right? In general, furries tend to be more LGBTQ-friendly and on average are more left-leaning than the general population, at least in the USA (I think IFRP has covered this, though I don't have their research in front of me). If "furry" and "fursona" are being used in such a manner, we would want to find reliable sources covering such usage before including it in Wikipedia. mwalimu59 (talk) 16:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it is. And people with far-right views are using it as a slur! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TakeHaru03 (talkcontribs)
As you have already been told on your talk page, Wikipedia article talk pages are not a forum. Either make an actual proposal for editing, directly backed up by published reliable sources, or find somewhere other than Wikipedia to complain. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TakeHaru03 (talkcontribs)
What. I'm a furry myself and I have never heard of anyone saying that the terms "Furry" and "Fursonas" are homophobic or right-wing. In fact, we find "furry" and "fursona" the proper terms. While technically there is also "anthro" that's mainly referring to making animals look human-like. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]