Talk:Gears of War 2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
(→God of War II) |
→Brumaks are aliens?: new section |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::I just got it, I will try to add in next couple of days. --[[User:Masem|M<font size="-3">ASEM</font>]] 02:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
::I just got it, I will try to add in next couple of days. --[[User:Masem|M<font size="-3">ASEM</font>]] 02:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::I've dug up most of the interesting top-level details for the time being. There's likely more on development but its hard to tell how that would all fit at this time. --[[User:Masem|M<font size="-3">ASEM</font>]] 05:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
:::I've dug up most of the interesting top-level details for the time being. There's likely more on development but its hard to tell how that would all fit at this time. --[[User:Masem|M<font size="-3">ASEM</font>]] 05:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Brumaks are aliens? == |
|||
The article says that Brumaks are aliens... is this true? What planet are they from? [[Special:Contributions/142.165.59.39|142.165.59.39]] ([[User talk:142.165.59.39|talk]]) 23:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:58, 11 April 2008
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gears of War 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
God of War II
God of War II should be re-derected here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.225.212 (talk) 11:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Its a completely different game and series. --MASEM 13:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you mean that "GOW2" should be redirected here instead of "God of War II", there is already a disambig at the top of the that page. I think that perhaps GOW2 should be redirected here closer to Gears of War 2's launch. xenocidic (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I concur that the "GOW2" should be redirected closer to launch. Wageslave (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Does it really matter, since both articles will refer to each other? JAF1970 (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- My suggestion to redirect GOW2 over to Gears of War 2 is because closer to the launch, more people will use GOW2 to search for Gears than God of War. (Perhaps they already are). The redirect should go to the more frequently desired article, should it not? xenocidic (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Does it really matter, since both articles will refer to each other? JAF1970 (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I concur that the "GOW2" should be redirected closer to launch. Wageslave (talk) 20:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you mean that "GOW2" should be redirected here instead of "God of War II", there is already a disambig at the top of the that page. I think that perhaps GOW2 should be redirected here closer to Gears of War 2's launch. xenocidic (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I agree completely. Gears of War 2 is closer to launch na dI beleive it should be changed. Not to be...."fanboyistic", but I think Gears if War 2 article is being visited more often anyway. Or we could change it to GeOW2, like some game sites do.Dcwil477 (talk) 16:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Why can't GOW2 just be made into a disambiguation page like BF2 used to be? At least for the time being it seems like a good compromise. TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 17:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno, a disambig page with 2 links seems like a waste to me. I was thinking of redirecting GOW2 to Gears 2 in May (6 months to launch). But if there's resistance from the God of War folks, then a disambig page would be the most neutral way to go about it. xenocidic (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I must say I disagree with you in this case Xenocidic, if you type GOW 2, you come to Gears of War 2, which can be a page that people that want info about God of War 2 don't want to see. Thats why I made the redirection info at the top of the article in the first place, because I wanted to go to God of War 2 and got to Gears of War 2 instead. So both GOW2 and GOW 2 should have info about Gears of War 2 and God of War 2... Jørgen88 (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't think about putting a space in between GOW and 2. I made a proper diambig tag. My earlier statement still stands that GOW2 and GOW 2 ought redirect to Gears of War 2, with a single disambig tag sending people to God of War II, but a proper disambig page would work as well. xenocidic (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, good. Jørgen88 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't think about putting a space in between GOW and 2. I made a proper diambig tag. My earlier statement still stands that GOW2 and GOW 2 ought redirect to Gears of War 2, with a single disambig tag sending people to God of War II, but a proper disambig page would work as well. xenocidic (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I must say I disagree with you in this case Xenocidic, if you type GOW 2, you come to Gears of War 2, which can be a page that people that want info about God of War 2 don't want to see. Thats why I made the redirection info at the top of the article in the first place, because I wanted to go to God of War 2 and got to Gears of War 2 instead. So both GOW2 and GOW 2 should have info about Gears of War 2 and God of War 2... Jørgen88 (talk) 21:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno, a disambig page with 2 links seems like a waste to me. I was thinking of redirecting GOW2 to Gears 2 in May (6 months to launch). But if there's resistance from the God of War folks, then a disambig page would be the most neutral way to go about it. xenocidic (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Game Informer preview
Check out the issue for new info JAF1970 (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Added the highlights mentioned by X3F, but someone should get the mag for the details. JAF1970 (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I just got it, I will try to add in next couple of days. --MASEM 02:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've dug up most of the interesting top-level details for the time being. There's likely more on development but its hard to tell how that would all fit at this time. --MASEM 05:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I just got it, I will try to add in next couple of days. --MASEM 02:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Brumaks are aliens?
The article says that Brumaks are aliens... is this true? What planet are they from? 142.165.59.39 (talk) 23:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)