User talk:Ceoil

 

|File:Mark rothko painting3.jpg |

 

1

2

4

Archive 1 (April 2006 - January 2007) Archive 2 (February 2007) Archive 3 (March/April 2007) Archive 4 (May/June 2007) Archive 5 (July 2007) Archive 6 (August/September 2007) Archive 7 (Oct 2007) Archive 8 (Nov 2007) Archive 9 (Dec 2007) Archive 10 (Jan 2008) Archive 11 (Feb 2008) Archive 12 (March 2008) Archive 13 (April 2008) Archive 14 (May 2008) Archive 15 (June 2008) Archive 16 (early summer 2008) Archive 17 (late summer 2008) Archive 18 (October 2008)

Featured article removal candidates
Martin Keamy	Review now
Pauline Fowler	Review now
Microsoft Security Essentials	Review now
Battle of Red Cliffs	Review now
Mariah Carey	Review now
Pokémon Channel	Review now
Concerto delle donne	Review now
The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask	Review now
Geography of Ireland	Review now

FACs needing feedback view •
Susanna Hoffs	Review it now
Fountain Fire	Review it now
Jozo Tomasevich	Review it now

Billy

I just have to say that Ada Lovelace is hot. What does this have to do with the above? Nothing. Which is exactly the same as your progress on it lately. Get to work! :P Ottava Rima (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey...

I had no idea things would get so out of hand the other day. Glad you haven't decided to leave over it, and hope it doesn't dampen your sense of fun - I'd miss that. Kafka Liz (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget about us - we're waitin for ya over at Caspar David Friedrich......your turn.....Modernist (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pushing for Panic of 1907 to get on the Main Page. I don't like promoting my own stuff, but it always is pretty cool to see it up there. --JayHenry (talk) 01:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Cats

Hmm, I received a two-disc tribute to The Cure called Perfect as Cats in the mail today. This looks like it might be good. Thankfully no one dares attempt to outdo the Dinosaur Jr cover of "Just Like Heaven", because it is obvious that they would fail. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I saw Stereolab tonight. It was quite wonderful. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It's getting close to Halloween. What will be on your playlist? WesleyDodds (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Sig

Ouch, that hurts :) Well, I'm sorry, but It doesn't look right without bold, I don't see how it is annoying, I have had this signature and format with my old ones the same way. You mean No Way Out (2004) FAC.--S_RX 22:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Bury the hatchet

(copying over) The block was an honest mistake, the unblock note was a pity, and my over reaction was a bigger pity. I have a bad temper, and I flew at you, and yes I did misjudge the timeline. And I apoligise. If you accept this as sincear, I would hope we can let this behind us with no hard feelings and move on. Wikipedia is supposed to be fun, a hobby, but its easy to get mired, burned out and too involvd in detail that at the end of the day just doesn't matter. We both have the best interests of the project at heart, and I realise our squabbling does nothing at all towards that aim. And yes, no I cant spell. Ceoil ^sláinte 22:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I would like nothing more than to wipe any tarnished slate clean and move on. Thanks for your note; I apologize again for causing a mess. Tan | 39 22:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Brilliant to see there's no hard feelings over this. – How do you turn this on (talk) 22:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree; thanks Tan for letting this go. Ceoil ^sláinte 23:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Funerary art

.. thanks for the kind words. If you want to, you can nom it. It really needs an Africa section, though. I think it will not pass without one. There's already more than a little material on the article's Talk to start one...

Plus other folks need to be consulted.. johnbod certainly! and madman...

This is one case in which I would appreciate a co-nom nod.... The prob with this nom is that it certainly needs at least two co-noms (me and john) and maybe three (madman). It'll be a crowd up there... If you wanna nom it, then you have the privilege of working out the details. ;-)

Later! Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 23:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for the support, every step of the way.... I have a boring meeting to go to. I'll ping the other two and point them to our talk pages.. Later! Ling.Nut ^{(talk—WP:3IAR)} 01:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Holy minimalism

I wasn't "accusing" anyone of anything. Why are you taking this personally? The article was completely unsourced and it read like original research. Those tags aren't "pointless." They let other editors know what work needs to be done and more importantly, they let readers know that an article is not up to standard. All I saw was a deletion of quite useful tags with a flippant edit summary. So I reverted it. Now you've added some sources. The system works. Cheers. freshacconci talktalk 01:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

You are severly missing the point of a collerabative project. "Accusing" is exactly how thoes tags read; please be more aware of the effect of your actions. Why not add the refs your self instead of tagging and runing. And to remind you, you did say this is origional research, which goes to show how much you know. In my openion thoes tags are a cancer, and extreamly disharntining to the people who write the articles. Cheers. Ceoil ^sláinte 06:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

(YO!) Templating the top of an article with "may be O.R." and "may need references" and "may need more references" without discussing these ideas is intellectually feeble. The article "may be" original research?; so may every other. If you can't provide an argument (in terms of knowledge, in terms of time expenditure), then find a different way to contribute to Wikipedia. These templates were meant to be used sparingly for quite unusual cases. Then they somehow turned into the most counterproductive (article-related) hobby on Wikipedia, ever. Above all, using a canned edit summary that says the edit was by a program called "Friendly" is just too fucking much.

Hope you're doing fine Ceoil. You didn't respond to my brief email. I know, I'm community leper now. Erase me message from your page if ye feel dirty. Whiskeydog (talk) 06:52, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I replied last night, Whiskey. Were working on Friedrich at last, about half ways through the bio, dreading the legacy section, as usual, ha ha. How arre things with you? Ceoil ^sláinte 06:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I just checked after I wrote that - replied. Keep up your good works. I can't decide whether you or JanHenrí deserves a barnstar more, and I only have this single one..... Whiskeydog (talk) 07:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh you tease. Me! Me! Ceoil ^sláinte 07:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

The problem is firefox provides handy buttons so that you can visit a page, scroll in 1-2 seconds, and make a snap jungement, hit 1 button; bam Origional research! And your off to the next article, whith a higher edit count. Jesus Christ. Ceoil ^sláinte 06:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/No Depression (album)

Just wanted to let you know that I copyedited the article, hopefully addressing your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/No Depression (album). Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Telling Wesley to ignore 3RR warnings:

Is a bad idea. Do you want to see him blocked? Don't go starting trouble, sweetheart. It's just not worth it from your perspective. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 18:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Have we ever had any communication at all ever? Judging from your block log you're quite popular with all the admins! Little sugar dumpling! Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 19:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

If that witless shit the best you are capable of; have fun with it. Baiting in such a obvious way is the mark of an inexperienced and clueless troll. Ceoil ^sláinte 19:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Call me a troll again and I will block you. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 19:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I do apologise for the perceived "baiting". It was a good faith 3RR warning to Wesley (See this). If someone you had never had any contact with asked someone else to ignore you, right when it's imperative not to be ignored, it's not going to make you feel good, is it? I do apologise for swearing and losing my temper etc. For the record, I had heard absolutely nothing about the fiasco with the previous block and was not rubbing it in or anything like that at all. I do hope you accept my apology, friend. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 20:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Pedro :  Chat  20:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Frankly, I dont buy it. "I had heard absolutely nothing about the fiasco with the previous block and was not rubbing it in or anything like that at all". Only a fool would accept that; ahem you did say, Judging from your block log you're quite popular with all the admins! Little sugar dumpling! Dont treat me like a child that can be sated with sugar and empty words after a deliberate baiting and a muscle orientated block warning. There is not a hint of sincerity or regret in the above. Please. Ceoil ^sláinte 20:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

"I do hope you accept my apology, friend", well if that isn;t salt on an open wound I dont know what is. How is this person an admin? Ceoil ^sláinte 21:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, honestly, I never heard about it at all; I don't frequent ANI. All I did was check your block log as I would do any user I am having a dispute with. As for my apology, I meant it honestly and with the utmost sincerity. I wouldn't be an adult if I couldn't apologise like one, which I have done. I understand that I am not without impunity and the ANI discussion helped me calm down. Ceoil, by believing my apology to be insincere you are showing signs of extreme bad faith. I have apologised, what else do you want? Why can't you just accept that I have apologised honestly and move on? It's not like you were without fault in our disagreement also. Can we just forget about this like the adults we are? Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 21:20, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Btw, about "friend", I often refer to people as "friend" or "buddy", I mean it just as much as its connotation implies. :-) Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 21:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Stop already. Your bullshit is not welcome here. I'm no fool, and if you think that kind of explination is enough, well pity you. Ceoil ^sláinte 21:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

He's being nice to you, dude. You're getting into incivility and beating the dead hose. Suigetsu

Comedy

[1] Nah - You can call me what you like! Seriously - can't we ask Pat (Scarian) if we can all work on this together without an ANI blood fest? I know it hurts, I think Scarian's made some bad "threats" and I think you made some bad responses. It happens, it's no big deal. I read the whole block thing the other day as it happens so I'm aquainted with that. Let's all take it of ANI and thrash it though? Please? Pedro :  Chat  20:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Look guys, I really apologise by User:WifeOfPedro needs assistance and RL is (marginally!) more important - I'll drop a note to Pat and make a couple more edits but may not be around for several hours after. Pedro :  Chat  20:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)