User talk:Kpjas

Archive 1

WP:MED

Hi,

the main page of WikiProject Medicine has just been redesigned, comments are welcome! Please consider listing yourself as a participant.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 00:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Seal casimir sml.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Seal casimir sml.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 12:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

New medicine COTW

NCurse _work 23:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Hungarian Signpost report

If you have time, could you please have a look at my nearly final sketch? :) NCurse _work 10:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I saw your edits, thank you very much, I'll fix references too. NCurse _work 16:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You should have let me know that it must be ready one week before the original deadline (18)... :) NCurse _work 15:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I understand now. The interwiki report writers of Simple English left the Wikipedia. Then I'm happy that I'd finished the hungarian one before starting the semester. :) NCurse _work 15:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki

Who's doing the interwiki report this week? Sugarpine^t 14:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, if you need any help with interwiki reports let me know. BTW, sorry if this was wrong of me, but I've already asked around in the Japanese Wikipedia for someone to do an interwiki report there. Let me know what help you need, and btw, Treebark might be back soon. Sugarpine^t 22:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyway I asked russian wiki to write a report but no answer form there... NCurse _work 09:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

We need help with Dutch right now. Russian is a bit to small as it Bengali which Ragib is writing about. As for Portguese, I think I'll take care of that busniess, though I can't confirm. I haven't heard back from any news about Japanese right now so I'm still waiting. Sugarpine^t 22:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm off to the Dutch Wiki, now. Sugarpine^t 22:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyways, I've asked two people from Dutch, now to go the Japanese Wiki. Could you look for people to do Portugese? Sugarpine^t 22:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Hi Kpjas. I'm back from my wikibreak, it was very long. Good progress with interwiki reports. I'm ready to retake my postion. May I ask you why were doing a report on the Bengali Wikipedia? It's too small..I thought we agreed on something like 10 wikipedias. Thank you for all your help with interwiki. T®eebark t | c 00:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I do not feel that Russian is big enough. Sugarpine's already asked someone from the Japanese Wikipedia, but most people say no. T®eebark t | c 13:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Japanese

Could you find someone from ja? Everyone's saying no in nl, but I'm working on that, and no one even replies in ja. The chatsboo link on the main page is where I posted. Sugarpine t/c 15:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Portuguese

Hi, Kpjas. I would like to volunteer for the Portuguese Wikipedia report. Is there some kind of special requirement for writing the text (other than it has to be in English)? Indech 18:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope. Sugarpine t/c 22:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Russian

Actully, we can do a russian report. I'm taking a break due to software so I won't be around for a while though I may check in to edit my watchlist every now and then. Thanks. Sugarpine t/c 14:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Kpjas/Fifth anniversary

The User:Kpjas/Fifth anniversary page has been listed by User:Sugarpine for Speedy deletion for several days now. If you agree with this, please delete the page; otherwise, please remove the notice. Thanks! Owen× ☎ 17:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Sari in Polish WP

Hi, Thank you, but i was looking for complete translation, is there anyone to helping me? Ofcourse i can translate every article regarding poland in persian wp in return --Ali 04:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki report

ForestH2, Sugarpine, Carmelapple, Streamwater, and I believe Apple9 are all the same user, as well as some 10-15 other sockpuppets. Watch for that when users offer to help you with the report- as far as I'm concerned, the user's worn out his welcome with me. Ral315 (talk) 20:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Hmmwv model.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hmmwv model.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Other language Wikipedias are not legitimate sources. You have to provide the original source of the material. -Nv8200p talk 20:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

your irc request regarding signpost dutch article

hi, i posted in our village pump nl:Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Wikipedia_Signpost.

translation :

The signpost asked once again for a contribution for one of its coming issues. I said it would maybe nice to do this at the 250.000 mark, but 'celebrating 250K can be a separate article for the Signpost'. I started on nl:Gebruiker:Aleichem/Signpost. Examples are te be found here and here. When nobody cooperates i will do it all by myself, and at last i will be given the chanche to criticize everyting going on nl:wiki :-) . So please quick additions, and not so boring as in the examples above. greetings Aleichem _overleg 30 sep 2006 22:48 (CEST)

First draft : nl:Gebruiker:Aleichem/Signpost. Its not like the other ones. Do you have any problems with that? Aleichem 00:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

When do you need it ? Aleichem 09:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to say that this is not something the New York Times would say; and it seems a lot like WP:POV. Doesn't it? I mean saying it's a fun place to be...Don't worry though......isn't that POV? Aquafish talk 02:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

People might want to check out Aquafish's talkpage before engaging with him in any way shape or form in regards to this project. --Charlesknight 22:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

From Portuguese Wikipedia

Hi, you can check out our progress here. I sincerely cannot tell if it can be assembled by Oct 2nd. I'll let you know tomorrow if a bit of a rush can make it happen. Regards, Indech 22:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I am writing you to say we will not be able to deliver the Portuguese Wikipedia Interwiki Report in advance (Oct 2nd). If you need anything, please let me know. Indech 01:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki

That certainly sounds fine to me. Ral315 (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I would definitely be wary of publishing the Dutch report at this point; if Portuguese gets finished, we can go with that. I trust your opinion/judgment. Ral315 (talk) 06:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

No need to worry. The Portuguese report is ready to go as planned. Indech 22:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Through-transmission ultrasonography vs pulse echo

Since you are the original author of the article on medical ultrasonography, I am letting you known that I posted the following message on the talk page of the article: "A very good and interesting article on medical ultrasonography. I have noted that through-transmission ultrasonography is not mentioned ( as used for example in quantitative ultrasound to assess bone density ). Should that be included in this article or should it be the subject of a separate article ?" Thanks for your time :-)Dr. Imbeau 02:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki reports

Can you have future interwikis done in userspace initially, so that if we postpone them, they're not in an incorrect location? Ral315 (talk) 02:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Interwiki report II

Hi Kpjas, seems that you took over the coordination of the interwiki reports. ForestH2 asked me a month ago if I could prepare a report from the german wikipedia for the 23 october edition, don't know if this is still scheduled. I could provide one for this edition but I'd also welcome a one week delay because the next days will be a bit busy for me. Please answer on my german talk page. greetings, --Elian ^Talk 02:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello Kpjas, I have the same question. I found that ForestH2 was blocked ;) Could you confirm me the date of the next french report. Is it the November 13th ? Pyb 20:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

wikEd

The wikEdlogo

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Veniarms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Veniarms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Appletree_bloom.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Appletree_bloom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 15:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Czosnek 1511.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Czosnek 1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Kpjas! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Wiesz, nawet nie wiedzialem ze jestes adminem na en wiki. Goraco zapraszam do naszej malej 'community' na PWNB :) -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Pics from Warsaw

Hello there! I noticed some great pics from Warsaw in your gallery. Could you upload them to commons one day? I'm particularly interested in the pics from the Warsaw Uprising Museum, as they seem to be of great use to our (I mean mine and Piotrus') latest collaboration that is revamping the article on Warsaw Uprising. I have lots of pics from that museum at hand, but 99% of them are grainy.. //Halibutt 08:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I mean picasa :) //Halibutt 14:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Stefan Czarniecki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan Czarniecki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Slovio AfD

Hi there,

I proposed Slovio for deletion.

Later i found out that you are one of the main contributors on meta:Slavopedia, so i would like to hear your opinion.

Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni 20:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Czy jesteś tym nienazwanym Polakiem?

Wydaje sie, ze tak :) Ksiazki co prawda nie mialem (eh, ile bym dal za kopie PSB), ale chodzi mu pewnie o moje projekty - User:Piotrus/List of Poles i User:Piotrus/Wikipedia interwiki and specialized knowledge test.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  10:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

MCOTW

JFW | T@lk 12:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Polish Wiki

Thank you for the comment and the link to my post! I was just curious what their opinion was. I'd love to know more about the state of medical articles of other wikis as well. NCurse _work 18:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Estragon2_1511.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Estragon2_1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nitroglycerin_pl_s.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nitroglycerin_pl_s.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 01:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Amphetamine_formula_pl.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Amphetamine_formula_pl.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 01:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Bolonia 3.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Bolonia 3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Bolonia 3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Survey request

Hi, Kpjas I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back

Fanfare :) WP:PWNB is a good place to watchlist. My advice is - do whatever you feel is fun (I couldn't get all the details quickly - consider opting in for stat fun :). If you are interested in science in Poland, that needs help... on the other hand, practically every topic section imaginable is understaffed. History is in the best shapes, but is also most controversial. Avoid being dragged into controversial, stressful disputes. Feel free to drop me a note on GG.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Właśnie jak ja postanowiłem, jednak - choć zobaczymy na jak długo, powrócić na pl Wiki... W tej chwili to jest naprawdę społeczeństwo które bardzo ciężko choruje, a nic nie wskazuje na to, aby się to miało jakoś zmienić. Enjoy your stay here anyway :) Roo72 (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Jakis idiotyzm

Zobacz [1]. Wlasnie zerkam... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Watchful eye on...

Tak, to ipek znany nam od dawna. Niestety, trudno robic cos wiecej niz rewertowac... zmienia IPki dynamicznie. Sprzataniem po nim zajmuje sie glownie User:Space Cadet, on bedzie wiedzial wiecej. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Bloc.net

Hang on. I didn't know that the subject would be a problem. What do I do to change that? It's know for the domain, but it should be "Bloc" or "Bloc AS" to be 100% correct.

Bloc.net

Hang on. I didn't know that the subject would be a problem. What do I do to change that? It's know for the domain, but it should be "Bloc" or "Bloc AS" to be 100% correct.(Uflidd (talk) 21:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)).

Solidarity

Hi Kpjas

I have seen that you have been busy tidying-up the newly-created Solidarity (South African trade union) page. I have big plans for that page. I am going to make it much more complete and comprehensive. The content that is on the page now is really just there as a placeholder. Eventually, the plan is to have separate pages for each of Solidarity's affiliate projects like AfriForum and Helpende Hand as well, as well as a translation of the page on the Afrikaans Wikipedia and the Dutch one as well. Other languages would probably have to be done by other people.

I would appreciate any help you want to give with keeping the content encyclopedic and up to Wikipedia's standards. I am employed at Solidarity, so therefore anything I add could be considered as properly sourced material? The parts about the history of Solidarity can be found in the book by Wessel Visser that I added as "Further Reading".

I'd appreciate hearing any suggestions from you, as I see you are a veteran Wikipedia editor. Are you (or have you been) active with the Polish Solidarity?

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Solidarnosc.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Solidarnosc.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

St. John's Wort

Sorry! I resubmitted the bit I'd added, but sourced it this time. Cheers, Kinou (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: WW30 etc.

Your words mean much to me. I am sure the committee would find your insight useful, too (they may not however know who you are - something you may want to clarify to them if you will be making a statement).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

An arbcom member said they will be drafting their initial proposals last weekend - but they didn't (in my experience, arbcom is prone to delays). But it's more done than not, I think. Do note that talk pages are likely to be less analyzed than main pages (with the possible exception of main talk outside statements). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikireader

Dzięki, ale nie jestem zainteresowany. Wycofałem się z angielskiej wiki (za dużo fanatyków, za dużo obelg pod moim adresem), na polską brak mi sił (za dużo roboty, niemal każdy artykuł trzeba by zredagować lub napisać od nowa - tyle że po polsku). Ale dzięki za propozycję. //Halibutt 13:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Masz notatkę ode mnie na plwiki

Masur (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

IP troll

Hi,

Could you please check on this troll with fixed IP: 24.86.116.250.

He seams to have problem with understanding basics of wikipedia, and now he is calling me a loser. --Ante Perkovic (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Krzysztof

Hi Kryzstof, greetings to you and thank you for your invitation to feel free to ask you about any clarifications about Wikipedia. I would like to ask you how can I (or some administrator) change back the wrong presentation of the South Slavic languages and dialects division, placed in the chart, which is placed in the right side of the articles about Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Bunjevac and Serbo-Croatian language? In the chart named 'Chart of South Slavic languages and dialects' someone has changed the basically known fact that the politically created standards of the SerboCroatian language, such as Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, Bunjevac, etc., they all belong to the Central South Slavic languages, and they don't belong in the same group with Slovenian language (which is Western group of South Slavic Languages). Please if you can, help me correct back this factual state of the things in this chart, because like it is now - it gives a wrong information to the readers. It should be like it was before,-showing: Serbian, Croatian, Bunjevac, and Bosnian in the SAME group of dialects, and that group is CENTRAL South Slavic Diasystem. Thanks;

As for the one who is complaining about me above, please have in mind that he is the one who started first with the vandalism, calling me names and erasing my edits on some 'talk' pages. I know that it's not of your business, just to let you know. Best Regards, 24.86.116.250 (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

Check this guy's contributions in:

a) all namespaces (47 edits)

b) article namespace (ZERO edits)

Last edit in article namespace from this IP was 18:11, 13 September 2007, so it propably wasn't this guy. Please note that wikipedia is not a Discussion forum. This guy must be very lonely and is seeking attention. I believe this is not place for helping people who are bored. Could you please block this guy or at least tell me where I can file a complaint? --Ante Perkovic (talk) 20:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

What do do

You once asked me that. Check Wikipedia:WikiProject Topic outline/Drafts/Topic outline of Poland for some ideas.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force

I am looking for help improving the dermatology content on wikipedia. Would you be willing to help, or do you have any friends interested in derm that would be interested in helping? Kilbad (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

User:24.86.116.250

A week block for this? Isn't that a tad extreme? I've seen established users, even admins, get more vocal when things get heated. The user seems to be more of a career newbie than a vandal. Given his history, I would naturally support a brief warning-shot-style block, but a week? What also concerns me is that your lengthy block may affect consensus on the pages he is debating on, if his voice is not represented. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 05:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I still would have given some indication that things are heading towards a block were the user to continue in his behaviour, but I see where you are coming from. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 08:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually 24.* has been systematically trolling talk pages (0 mainspace edits) for a year or so. What is really pathetic is utilizing the "fighting nationalist" rhetoric in advance to whitewash himself of possible accusations of him being the real POV partisan, with no real arguments and esp. no desire for any constructive discussion. Of the topic he "discusses" (West South Slavic languages), he apparently has no competence, misquoting the "authoritative" sources, spreading lies and ad hominems against anyone who dares to question or let alone invalidate his perception of the "truth". --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

What you're saying Ivan - is EXACTLY what you're doing on these pages, if you have problems blaming others for what you're doing, than that's your seerious problem, and you'd better start seeking some help:)). Bye.24.82.216.163 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Quoting from the talkpage: those who I was dealing with these days -they are all most likely supporters of one destructive and defeated force, supporting the ones who glorify their fascisoid NDH and fascism and who salute 'heil Hitler' at the soccer stadiums. Calling people fascists and supporters of Hitler would certainly merit a nice block, wouldn't it? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

MCOTW

JFW | T@lk 09:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Infectious mononucleosis

Hey, thanks for your edits to infectious mononucleosis. I noticed you moved all the differential diagnosis stuff into a new section and unfortunately I've had to undo that. WP:MEDMOS/Diseases states that differentials should be included within the diagnosis section of the article. You may wish to read through MEDMOS further to understand further how medical sectioning (in an article sense, not a psychiatric sectioning sense!) works here. Thanks again for your edits, I look forward to working with you more in future. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 13:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Antibiotics and alcohol

I disagree with the edits you performed on the antibiotics page. That article is NOT intended to be pure technical formal definition of which antibiotics exactly directly react with alcohol. This is for general reader, and for average person it's important to know that alcohol is dangerous with any antibiotics and very dangerous with some of them. It's a common opinion in the medical community, i posted the references, which you removed. Besides it's based on a simple facts and logic about liver enzymes. The reference you posted cannot be easily accessed of verified by an average person. It's a 6yo book, and I'm sure it just checks the "direct" reactions of the antibiotics, and does not look at indirect effects. Who do you think reads this page? Who will get hurt if we give a warning there? Better, if we just say what most of the doctors in the world will tell you? What you say there now is the bold (incorrect) statement that alcohol is not dangerous with antibiotics ("contrary to popular belief"?) Who you wrote that statement for, chronic alchoholics looking for a reason to drink? I personally had severe liver problems, when i drank alcohol with one of (supposed to be safe) antibiotics. I want to warn other ppl, so they are at least aware of potential complications, and not just send them straight to the cemetery. That article is the place to warn.Andru nl (talk) 14:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

MCOTW again

JFW | T@lk 00:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ostronog.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ostronog.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Play Nice

Sorry I was misled. You have done no wrong and I beg forgiveness.--Adam in MO Talk 17:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry XMAS

Merry XMAS from User:Piotrus. 12:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Czosnek2 1511.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Czosnek2 1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

MCOTW

JFW | T@lk 15:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

MCOTW

JFW | T@lk 11:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

History of pl.wikipedia

Would you be so kind to look here and add some data ? 76.16.182.29 (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)