Talk:Muslim conquest of Persia

List of Referenced content from reliable sources removed from this article

This section is being introduced to enable recording of content with citations removed from the article . Intothefire (talk) 07:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

• User Muhammad Adil has deleted reflist section on this talk page ??
  Intothefire (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

dude becoz its totally unnecessary to put it here ???? lolzz الله أكبرMohammad Adil 17:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

A number of articels have a reflist section on the talk page. I see no reason why we should not have one here.Slatersteven (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree. I will message Intothefire to re-add it. warrior4321 17:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

he already hv added it back, i u ppl r getting defensive :-). i hv no problem with this section but was just wondering wht u gonna do with it ? الله أكبرMohammad Adil 18:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Mohammad, please use indentation and sign your name at the end of your text. It makes it more easier to read that way. warrior4321 19:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, please lets have it back. Saroshp (talk) 21:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

i always sign dude

الله أكبرMohammad Adil 19:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Lets take this to Alis talk page.Slatersteven (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

• Wereldburger758 deletes a referenced quote on 27 December 2009
  

reason cited by Wereldburger758 for deletion :cannot make any sense of it.

Would appreciate to know what you couldent make sense of , specially since the content was within the section on religion .

Intothefire (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Content removed by Wereldburger758 on 27 December without discussion 2009

“ In almost all the Iranian provinces , according to Al Mussadi fire temples were to be found - the Madjus he says (ed Barbier de Meynard, iv86 ) venerate many fire temples in Irak Fars, Kirman , Sidjistan , Khurasan , Tabaristan , al Djibal ,Abdharbaidjastan, Arran (He adds also in Hind Sind and Sin ). This general statement of al Masudi is fully supported by the medevial geographers who make mention of fire temples in most of the Iranian towns . ”

Intothefire (talk) 05:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

deletion

well i agree with user wereldburger when he said while removing the content it donsn't make any sense.

Perhaps you should first try reading the whole article (or at least the last few related sections) and then figure out where your stuff fits best, i would also suggest a copy-editing of your deleted paragraph in order to adjust it to its related content. Try finding the a place for it in the article where it can be adjusted according to the context, then i will or user wereldburger will copy-edit to.

You should ask user wereldburger for his comments.

الله أكبرMohammad Adil 09:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

also tht table with any temple or city name seems weird to me. wht it for, i mean whts the purpose. الله أكبرMohammad Adil 09:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Mohammad, I'd like to suggest to you that you sign your name -with- your text rather than underneath. It makes it much easier to read discussions when everyone's comment(s) are properly organized. I am requesting that you do it as such:

Text goes here. ~~~~~ rather than text goes here

~~~~

Hope you understand what I'm saying. Thanks, warrior4321 05:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

deletion2

You want to know, Intothefire, what I don't understand of what you have written. For a few lines that is quite a lot: Al Musadi, Madjus, Hind Sind and Sin, al Masudi. Those are all names that I don't know anything about. That makes the whole paragraph incomprehensible. And is this a quote: "(ed Barbier de Meynard, iv86 ) " or something else?

If you write something on this wikipedia, Intothefire, you must assume that your reader doesn't know anything about it. So use proper English and write as comprehensible as possible.

Furthermore, like Mohammad adil says, what you write must fit into the article you are writing in. Wereldburger758 (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Wereldburger758

• I take your suggestions as positive to improve the content provided.
  
• Provided an explanation of Al Masudi in the article and improved context by extention.
  
• It is my intention to provide quotes from reliable sources without refraction and therefore the inclusion of in line citation provided by Houtama viz (ed Barbier de Meynard, iv 86).This is as per wiki conventions for quotes .
  
• Will provide links for Hind and Sindh
  

Thankyou for your suggestions ....certainly better than unilateral deletions. Intothefire (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

i hv did some copy editing of it, i think there is no need of mentioning (ed Barbier de Meynard, iv 86) in between the quote when u are already giving a references at the end.

الله أكبرMohammad Adil 11:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Now that is more like it. I have moved the text to make it fit into the text. Nice cooperation. Wereldburger758 (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Why this stuff ................... He also added Sindh and Sin of the Indian subcontinent (Al-Hind) to the list. This general statement of al Masudi is fully supported by the medieval geographers who make mention of fire temples in most of the Iranian towns .[60] There were also large and thriving Christian and Jewish communities, along with smaller numbers of Buddhists and other groups. However, there was a slow but steady movement of the population toward Islam. The nobility and city-dwellers were the first to convert, Islam spread more slowly among the peasantry and the dihqans, or landed gentry. By the late 10th century, the majority of Persians had become Muslim. Until the 15th century, most Persian Muslims were Sunni Muslims, though today Iran is known as a stronghold of the Shi'a Muslim faith. The Iranian Muslims projected many of their own Persian moral and ethical values[citation needed] that predates Islam into the religion, while recognizing Islam as their religion and the prophet's son in law, Ali as an enduring symbol of justice.

........is under the heading Zoroastrian fire temples The above mentioned paragraph deals with religion right ? so its place is under the section religion. It has no relation in any sense to the heading of Zoroastrians fire temples.

So will u plz explain why u think it should be under the heading zoroatrian fire temples

Regards الله أكبرMohammad Adil 13:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Total Lies

Persia under islamic rule section didn't say a word about what the arabs really did, instead theres bunch of lies about tolerant arabs! lololol. Shuv these lies up your asses filthy ragheads. The arabs not only forced all iranians to convert to islam, they enslaved all women and children, killed most men, burned all books and libraries, stole every treasure they could find. Tolerant arabs? hahahhaha Wikipedia's political and historical articles must be taken down, because 90% of them are written by bunch of idiots, the least reliable source for those kind of articles are found in wikipedia. WP generates noise of the retards, not knowledge. gl kiddies