Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RoseSoul (talk | contribs)
RoseSoul (talk | contribs)
Line 129: Line 129:
: I edit mainly Anglo Saxon and local sites. The local sites particularly are prone to joke and spam edits. I think that this tool would be useful in reducing such edits. [[User:Wilfridselsey|Wilfridselsey]] ([[User talk:Wilfridselsey|talk]]) 20:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
: I edit mainly Anglo Saxon and local sites. The local sites particularly are prone to joke and spam edits. I think that this tool would be useful in reducing such edits. [[User:Wilfridselsey|Wilfridselsey]] ([[User talk:Wilfridselsey|talk]]) 20:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)


== [[User:RoseSoul]] ==



[[User:RoseSoul]]
]
*<span class="plainlinks">[[User:RoseSoul|{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}]] · ([[User talk:RoseSoul|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/RoseSoul|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/RoseSoul|deleted]] · [[:luxo:RoseSoul|cross-wiki]] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:RoseSoul}}| name=wikichecker}} · [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}}}&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia count] · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:RoseSoul}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|user={{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}}}}} logs] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|page=User:{{anchorencode:{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}}}}} block&nbsp;log] · [{{fullurl:Special:Listusers|limit=1&username={{urlencode:{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}}}}} lu] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}|rfar]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}|rfc]] · [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}|rfcu]] · [[Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}|ssp]] · [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{ucfirst:RoseSoul}}|spi]] · [http://toolserver.org/~eagle/archivesearch.php?search=%28%5C%7B%5C%7B%5B%5E%5B%5D*%5C%7C%7C%5B%5E%7C%3A%2FA-Za-z0-9%5D%7C%5E%29{{urlencode:RoseSoul}}%5B%5EA-Za-z0-9%5D&useregex=1&where%5B%5D=enpedia_3rr&where%5B%5D=enpedia_an&where%5B%5D=enpedia_ani&where%5B%5D=enpedia_cn search an, ani, cn, an3]</span>) ([[Special:Userrights/RoseSoul|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''assign permissions'''</span>]])
:I generally scan pages related to subjects that I am familiar with (like classical composers) for any mistakes and vandalism. I enjoy fighting vandalism, as it is frustrating for me to encounter annoying and obvious attempts to destroy a perfectly fine page. [[User:RoseSoul|<font color="deeppink">Rose</font><font color="darkturquoise">Soul</font>]] [[User talk:RoseSoul|<font color="blueviolet">(Talk)</font>]] 20:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:48, 21 August 2010

Reviewer (add request)

I am currently focusing on working against vandals; I am most times stationes in RC when I am on, and have seen many articles pending review, most of which, have been vandalism. With this tool, I would be further encouraged to go a bit more in-depth in reviewing such articles. Hazard-SJ Talk 07:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Polargeo (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After carefully read the history of this "topic", I'm willing to help, although I don't think this development is a good thing. I contribute actively on many computer/software/internet related articles. mabdul 16:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - Tiptoety talk 16:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! mabdul 17:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have a 4+ year history of editing Wikipedia, constantly reverting vandalism and unsubstantiated edits, improving grammar and copy, and assessing articles. PKT(alk) 22:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Wikipedia for two years, using Twinkle and the undo function to strictly enforce the 100 or so pages on my watchlist. intelati 00:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honored.--intelati 00:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Jellykaya (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to help with the reviewing process. I am good with the current news about math and the sciences.

 Not done Currently you only have 12 edits. Keep on editing, and work up enough edits for us to able to definitively evaluate you. Regards, Jujutacular talk 02:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I can do pretty good at this, I've been on wikipedia for more than 4 years, and I am not affected by editcountis.. :-) NëŧΜǒńğerTalk to me 07:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 03:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I routinely watch a large list of articles for vandalism; happy to contribute further to WP than just editing Dhollm (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am a regular contributor, know vandalism policy, read reviewers guide, ALWAYS check for neutrality, I watch ~100 pages, some BLP's (mainly musicians) would like to help! Theornamentalist (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've been reverting lots of vandalism lately, and I've recently been given the right to use the rollback feature. I support the pending changes trial policy and I think that I could help the community even more by becoming a reviewer. —Waterfox (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 18:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have been a member of Wikipedia for a year and a half and enjoy editing articles and fighting vandalism. I have read and agree with the proposal for the pending changes policy and wish to help in any aspect. Jennie--x (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 03:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I often patrol the Recent Changes page and would appreciate this tool. I've often seen the "Pending Review" template and, like another person stated, they're often vandalism. I know all the policies and understand how this works and what it's supposed to do. Nolelover (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 03:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have rollback rights on the English Wikipedia, but can rarely find vandalism to use them on. Becoming a reviewer would give me the opportunity to fight vandalism more, as I would know better where to look for it. MR. PreZ 17:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 18:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. MR. PreZ 18:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Wikipedia for many years and I am involved in the editing of biographies Racklever (talk) 08:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 16:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I have been editing articles on Wikipedia for about two years and I mainly focus on articles regarding music. As you might know, several of these articles are sites of vandalism by unregistered viewers who dislike that band/genre etc. Also, I have been falsely led by vandalized articles many a times and so I want to make sure that wikipedia does not give false information to its users. Torque3000Talk 20:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia editor for over 6 years, would like to help out if I can Zerbey (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done by Karanacs -FASTILY (TALK) 00:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've been at Wikipedia for 4+ years, and while my activity patterns are spastic at best, I actively patrol RC whenever I'm logged on. --Hojimachongtalk 21:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've been editing for 4 years and always looking to help out Wikipedia in any way possible, and this seems like a good way that I can further help out. Miles Blues (talk · contribs) 21:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I currently like to welcome new users, process edit requests on semi-protected pages, and patrol recent changes for vandalism. I also add references and links to pages where requested. I'd like to help keep things moving quickly :) IainUK talk 23:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am a user with over 900 edits and rollbacker rights and I mainly fight vandalism concerning music/album pages. Those pages are mainly vandalized by people who add non-existing track listings or features and such vandalism occurs multiple times on one and the same page. This tool would help me prevent the spreading of false information and vandalism. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 23:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 00:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I want to revert vandalism because I want to prevent vandalism from the IP Addresses and vandalism-only accounts to keep Wikipedia safe. Wayne Olajuwon (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should be applying for Rollbacker not Reviewer. Is that what you meant? -- œ 01:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have been an editor for over 4 years with over 7000 edits. I am already a rollbacker. Any tool that can protect articles from vandalism is worth having. Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done like dinner. -- œ 01:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Fishiehelper2 (talk) 08:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like to revert vandalism with Twinkle and think this tool would help me a lot with reverting. Látches (talk) 20:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

)

I edit mainly Anglo Saxon and local sites. The local sites particularly are prone to joke and spam edits. I think that this tool would be useful in reducing such edits. Wilfridselsey (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


]