User talk:Daniele.tampieri

Welcome!

Hello, Daniele.tampieri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - crz crztalk 20:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Good luck. Let me know if you need any help. - crz crztalk 21:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Extensive TeXification, etc

Hi. Thank you for your contributions. And just a few notes about style. First, putting too much TeX and replacing HTML with TeX is not always a good idea. Per the math style manual, inline formulas better be left as HTML, so ''x''² or <math>x^2</math> are better than <math>x^2\,</math>.

Also, and more importantly, if there is a formula at the end of sentence, one should put a period (.) at the end of that formula, it signifies that the sentence is over.

These are small things, but I thought I'd let you know. You can reply here if you have comments. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

And one should not put links in section headings, so

== Logic/Model theory definition ==

should be

 == Logic/Model theory definition ==

Chers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Links

Not sure I understood all of it, but it all sounds fine. WP:EL is the relevant guideline. Good luck. - crz crztalk 22:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you had added a link to milstd.net. That site has been systematically spamming Wikipedia using what I suspect are open proxies. I know you're not a spammer, but I thought you'd want to know. Perhaps there's another, more Wikipedia-friendly site you could use. Thanks, --A. B. ^(talk) 15:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

PS Thanks for all your work on electronics-related articles.

Try this link: http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/

Messy and illegible notation

I think this edit is unfortuanate. You wrote:

$p(x)$∈K$[x]$,

rather than either

$p(x)\in \mathbf {K} [x],$

or perhaps

$p(x)$ ∈ K$[x]$

(with suitable spacing).

Moreover, as I think Oleg Alexandrov already pointed out to you, although "displayed" TeX looks very good on Wikipedia, "inline" TeX often looks terrible. Michael Hardy 21:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and first of all thank you for your advices. Regarding the notation for the vector space of polynomials (which is also a ring and thus an algebra) common practice requires

$p(x)\in \mathbb {K} [x],$

but as you (and Oleg) already pointed out "inline" TeX looks very often bad, so I tried (unsuccesfully) to arrange an inline notation giving the same flavor of the standard. I think that a solution could be to give the same information on the same line of the formula below, to enhance clarity and aesthetics: please check. :) Daniele.tampieri 22:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: \scriptstyle

Question about \scriptstyle use discipline in mathematical typing.

I replied on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

BV functions

Hi. I see you did expand quite a bit the bounded variation article. If you would like to write more on BV functions in n-dimensions, note the following article on PlanetMath: BV function. That stuff can be copied legally to Wikipedia (see our WP:PMEX project), and we have a tool which can easily convert things to Wikipedia format (you would need the article id to use the tool, which you can see in the URL of that article, id=6969).

So, I wonder if you are interested in expanding bounded variation with that material. I can help along the way with formatting and stuff (I know about BV functions also, but not a whole lot). You can reply here in either case (I will keep this page on my watchlist). Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Oleg. Yes, I am interested in expanding Bounded variation with the article on PlanetMath BV function: as you can see I added an external link to that page some times ago. Of course, I would like to add more from other references (mainly from Giusti and Hudjaev and Vol'pert books, since they are "richer" both from the theory and applications point of view), and of course I would be glad if you decide to help me enriching this voice: recently I edited the Germ voice with Nbarth, and he helped me a lot showing me the deep sheaf theoretic aspect of the subject. Now I am at work, so I cannot show you the details of the plan of the voice that I have in mind, but later I'll write you something on your talk page. :) Daniele.tampieri 13:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Great. Thank you for your work on math articles. If you need anything, just let me know. I have bounded variation on my watchlist and I will keep an eye on what you are doing there. :) Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Everyone interested can see the proposed voice layout and further discussion Daniele.tampieri 07:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

And also the talk page related to the voice has contains some information. Daniele.tampieri 16:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Avalanche bjt base trigger.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Avalanche bjt base trigger.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Gaetano Fichera.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Gaetano Fichera.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Wow!

Hi: I just wanted to let you know that I am incredibly impressed by your article on the Signorini problem. It's fascinating reading. Cheers, Ray^Talk 05:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Severi.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Severi.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Fichera.jpeg

File:Fichera.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Fichera.jpeg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Fichera.jpeg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Oleinik.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Oleinik.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Severi.jpeg is now available as Commons:File:Severi.jpeg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Vasilii Sergeevich Vladimirov.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Vasilii Sergeevich Vladimirov.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Zappa.jpeg is now available as Commons:File:Zappa.jpeg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Copernicus at Bologna

Thanks for the beautiful photos. They were much needed, to provide a concrete connection for Copernicus with Italy. I missed seeing the house and plaque when I visited Bologna. Thanks! Nihil novi (talk) 21:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome: I walk along that way almost weekly, so I thought it was nice to add some pics to the English Wikipedia entry about Copernicus. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I've had similar experiences of going for a walk and returning with photos of historically or culturally interesting sites that I've encountered. You're fortunate to live in a beautiful city in a beautiful country. Nihil novi (talk) 06:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Mihlin/Mikhlin

Suits me fine. It makes sense for the transliteration to match that of his Wikipedia biography page. Thanks for the heads-up, nonetheless. :-) (By the way, not that it matters, but I think that as well as Stein, Grafakos uses the "Mihlin" transliteration in his books, though I don't have my copy to hand to check...) Tcnuk (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Probably even Grafakos refers mainly to the English translation of (Mikhlin 1948) where the transliteration is "Mihlin" (or at least I think so... since I haven't a copy of the translated paper :D).Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

• Mikhlin, Solomon G. (1948), "Singular integral equations", 'UMN', 3 (3(25)): 29–112, MR27429 {{citation}}: External link in |journal= (help) (in Russian).

I have marked you as a reviewer

I have added the "reviewers" property to your user account. This property is related to the Pending changes system that is currently being tried. This system loosens page protection by allowing anonymous users to make "pending" changes which don't become "live" until they're "reviewed". However, logged-in users always see the very latest version of each page with no delay. A good explanation of the system is given in this image. The system is only being used for pages that would otherwise be protected from editing.

If there are "pending" (unreviewed) edits for a page, they will be apparent in a page's history screen; you do not have to go looking for them. There is, however, a list of all articles with changes awaiting review at Special:OldReviewedPages. Because there are so few pages in the trial so far, the latter list is almost always empty. The list of all pages in the pending review system is at Special:StablePages.

To use the system, you can simply edit the page as you normally would, but you should also mark the latest revision as "reviewed" if you have looked at it to ensure it isn't problematic. Edits should generally be accepted if you wouldn't undo them in normal editing: they don't have obvious vandalism, personal attacks, etc. If an edit is problematic, you can fix it by editing or undoing it, just like normal. You are permitted to mark your own changes as reviewed.

The "reviewers" property does not obligate you to do any additional work, and if you like you can simply ignore it. The expectation is that many users will have this property, so that they can review pending revisions in the course of normal editing. However, if you explicitly want to decline the "reviewer" property, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Bounded variation --> lp spaces

Bug corretto, grazie per la segnalazione! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 05:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Redlinks

Saw the discussion at SunCountryGuy's talkpage; naw, redlinks are not only fine but highly appreciated! It gives people hints on what to do, and shows anyone reading the article potential projects. I find it quite helpful :). Ironholds (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much: I'll wait SunCountryGuy's answer, if any, and then I'll restore the redlinks. After all, even the entry "Giovanni Battista Rizza was a redlink until yesterday evening. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, I saw that the answers of Jessy show rationality and a tentative insight, therefore I would like to discuss more the issues with him. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

His answers are quite simply wrong ;p. Our inclusion criteria for scientists, theorists and academics such as Lucilla Bassoti include "has won a prestigious award" - which she has. Ironholds (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Daniele.tampieri. You have new messages at SunCountryGuy01's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.