User talk:Crohnie

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Join the Conspiracy! Thanks Shot_info

Requests completed

Hello, Crohnie. You have new messages at C.Fred's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just because

DocOfSoc has given you a breath of Spring to promote WikiLove gratitude, and Joy ;-)

— DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

HI ya Dear! Question: How can I tell one of my tsp's that long and critical edit summaries are totally unnecessary. He is a good guy, who lacks a funny bone. He is really helpful but his summaries are really annoying. e.g. "External links don't go in the text of the article. They go in an "External links" section at the bottom, where this particular external link is already listed. We don't need to duplicate links." Hope this finds you well!!! Help! xoxo — DocOfSoc • Talk • 07:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

You can try to politely ask him to focus more on what he edited and use a link to the policy instead of writing it all out like this. If that doesn't work than it's best to just read what is important and ignore the rest. Sorry, this is the only thing I can think of. It's really nothing major so ignoring the parts that is not focused is the best you can do until they tire of writing out long explanations like this. If they are new, show them what they could have written instead of what they did write to be helpful to a newbie. HTH! --CrohnieGal^Talk 14:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I have appologized to the editor for the problems I caused, which I didn't know were probelms until today. I thought I was supposed to explain my edit in the edit summary so that other editors understood what I was doing. I just didn't know I wasn't supposed to be as specific. I'm going to stay away from editing California articles, and do work elsewhere, so can we just leave it at that? Cmr08 (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't know the details of all of this but let me say this. When you do an edit summary just say what you did to the article. For instance if you move something say you move a paragraph from a to b location. If you are removing vandalism just say removing vandalism. You can edit the articles. If you have a long reason than use the talk page and let editors know that way. I don't think there's a problem so don't worry. If I can help please let me know. Doc #2 will work with you and I will help both of you if needed. I think the two of you can work together nicely, just sounds like communications are a little off for the two of you. Let me know if I can help either of you about this. I will be back online tomorrow morning EST. I hope this helps, --CrohnieGal^Talk 20:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

My Friend Cmr are just fine. TY so much for your help! We just had a a small "Failure to communicate..." Feel free to archive this, except your flower of course :-D — DocOfSoc • Talk • 06:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

That's what I thought. Glad everything is worked out now. We'll talk soon, --CrohnieGal^Talk 08:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

• News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news

• In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news

• WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify

• Features and admins: Featured list milestone

• Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?

• Technology report: UploadWizard release; code review – should MediaWiki move to Git?; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Noticeboard discussion

An editor you have been involved with at Nicole Kidman is the subject of a discussion at the Admin Notice Board here. As you have been an editor on the page in question, your comments may prove helpful. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. --CrohnieGal^Talk 11:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Crohnie. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

ok, thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 11:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Juventud Rebelde Jimmy Zoppi Gabourey Sidibe Yukimi Nagano 1971 British Speedway League Division Two One Little Indian (film) Allison Abbate Alphaherpesvirinae 1973 British Speedway League 1971 British Speedway League 1970 British Speedway League Division Two Marcel Jenni Hammers Over the Anvil Timothy R. McVeigh E Line (RTD) Golan Regional Council Natasha Gregson Wagner Optic stalk The Story of Alexander Graham Bell

Cleanup 2006 North American Under 21 World Qualifier 1975 Speedway World Team Cup Detroit Film Critics Society Merge Possession of stolen goods Isleworth Studios Co-production (filmmaking) Add Sources Brittany Murphy Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Cast Julia Roberts Wikify Naturalistic disease theories Marisa Coulter Desson Thomson Expand Jamie Foxx George A. Romero filmography A Film with Me in It

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

• News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news

• In the news: Academic contributions; Jimmy Wales weighs in on murder trial controversy; brief news

• Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?

• WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on your new file mover access

Should be up and running now - good luck! - 2/0 (cont.) 15:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Responding on editors talk page, thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 19:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

• News and notes: Editor retention; Malayalam loves Wikimedia; Wikimedia reports; brief news

• In the news: What if experts just want to get their links into Wikipedia?; brief news

• Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?

• Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Crohnie. You have new messages at DoctorJoeE's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ludwigs2's comments

Hi Crohnie. I saw your comments on User talk:Ludwigs2 along with his latest reply. Thank you for being one of the few people to speak up on my behalf.

He has been barred from the arbitration workshop pages for making personal attacks on me. His latest reply to you seems to also to be a misrepresentation. As one example, a meatpuppet of two topic-banned users was identified by a large body of evidence provided privately to ArbCom. Of course evidence of meatpuppetry, involving as it does real life identities, cannot be discussed on wikipedia. Ludwigs2 has chosen to misinterpret that in the first point of his reply. As for the rest of my editing patterns, I cannot recognize myself from anything in his description.

I take a wikbreak at the beginning of each year because I give a graduate course in Cambridge for 2 months and so am away for France. That wikibreak has been prolonged by an unexpected bout of brochitis, which seems to be going the rounds in the UK and, from what I hear, the US.

Any way, thank you again for talking to Ludwigs2.

Regards, Mathsci (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)