Jump to content

User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by Kbrslkz (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Seb az86556. (TW)
mNo edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:
I'm becoming more convinced he's a troll, and he's certainly disruptive. In any case, I don't think engaging him is going to do anything but encourage him further. He's moved on to [[Talk:Anders Behring Breivik]] now, again accusing the editors of an apparent conspiracy. So I'd suggest taking him to ANI over the disruptive edits rather than engaging him on his talk page, as I suspect it's just feeding him... (I really don't have the time to open and deal with an ANI complaint right now, or I'd do it myself.) – [[User:2001:db8|2001:db8::]] ([[User talk:2001:db8|rfc]] | [[Special:Contributions/2001:db8|diff]]) 00:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm becoming more convinced he's a troll, and he's certainly disruptive. In any case, I don't think engaging him is going to do anything but encourage him further. He's moved on to [[Talk:Anders Behring Breivik]] now, again accusing the editors of an apparent conspiracy. So I'd suggest taking him to ANI over the disruptive edits rather than engaging him on his talk page, as I suspect it's just feeding him... (I really don't have the time to open and deal with an ANI complaint right now, or I'd do it myself.) – [[User:2001:db8|2001:db8::]] ([[User talk:2001:db8|rfc]] | [[Special:Contributions/2001:db8|diff]]) 00:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
:Too much drama; I figure every second he's busy typing stuff on his talkpage he won't type elsewhere. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 00:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
:Too much drama; I figure every second he's busy typing stuff on his talkpage he won't type elsewhere. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] <sup>[[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]]</sup> 00:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
You shouldn't threaten to ban new users, maybe we should take YOU to ANI over the accusations.

Revision as of 23:34, 16 September 2012

earlier on this program...
(archives)
(+)

2013

12285
  
january 2013
8185
  
february 2013
18650
  
march 2013
6264
  
april 2013

User RayrayZone

I've started an ANI report because this is the second time the user has abused me as well as attempted to remove my comments at an AfD discussion and remove other users comments. just FYI. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 00:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And blocked by Black Kite :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yup it got noticed around the same time I posted this. Thanks Seb much appreciated. I know things like this happen once in a blue moon, but it still took me by suprise. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 01:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

For future reference, since you were the first to falsely accuse me of something and assume bad faith, the next time you have something uncivil to say to me, stay the hell off my talk page and don't ever contact me. I don't want to see any message from you again.Mendsetting (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I'll report you straight away w/o warnings and w/o notification. I'll link to this section instead. Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Barack Obama talk". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 05:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Assistance

Seb, please join me and Tarc at your first opportunity to discuss your recent reverts of my talk page edits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Settdigger_Requests_Editor_Assistance_Re:_Seb_az86556_.26_Tarc.27s_reverts_of_my_Obama_talk_page_edits Thank you.

Settdigger (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution

Dear Seb, As requested, I've asked for dispute resolution in our argument.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Wikipedia:_Editor%20assistane,%20Barack%20Obama:%20talk,%20Barack%20Obama%20Presidency:%20talk

Thank you, Settdigger (talk) 06:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis creation narrative

Hi, Seb. I've suggested a compromise at Talk:Genesis creation narrative#Requested move. As a vocal supporter of the move, would you please comment on whether it would satisfy you? - Cal Engime (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am following this, but I'm not gonna waste my time arguing. If your suggestion is this, I'm not even sure what you propose. You need to somehow clarify that I think. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am proposing that we choose a page title that avoids the need to describe the myth as a myth, a narrative, or anything else by using a proper name for the story. One way to do this would be by writing an article in summary style about the Primeval History (a term for the first eleven chapters of Genesis, encompassing creation, the flood, and the Tower of Babel—see Book of Genesis#Structure), then renaming the article "Creation in the Primeval History" with "Main article: Primeval History" at the top. Alternatively, we could just move it to Creation in the Book of Genesis and make it a subarticle of the existing page on Genesis as a whole. - Cal Engime (talk) 23:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Wouldn't solve the problem. The problem is the special/different treatment this story/myth gets. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:142.59.53.48

If you read my comment in his talk, I suspect he has refactored before with a different IP. I tried to untangle it, but gave up. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't matter. s/he cannot simply claim "that was me". that's what creating an account is for. cheers to you as well :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

Can you possibly be unaware that the attacks all started with protests over a movie? Regardless of who was behind the violence, the protests were the result of the outrage at the trailer. Amandajm (talk) 06:47, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

you need to justify those changes on the talkpage. Go there. No further posts by you here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bobinisrael

I'm becoming more convinced he's a troll, and he's certainly disruptive. In any case, I don't think engaging him is going to do anything but encourage him further. He's moved on to Talk:Anders Behring Breivik now, again accusing the editors of an apparent conspiracy. So I'd suggest taking him to ANI over the disruptive edits rather than engaging him on his talk page, as I suspect it's just feeding him... (I really don't have the time to open and deal with an ANI complaint right now, or I'd do it myself.) – 2001:db8:: (rfc | diff) 00:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too much drama; I figure every second he's busy typing stuff on his talkpage he won't type elsewhere. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't threaten to ban new users, maybe we should take YOU to ANI over the accusations.