User talk:SNIyer12

Please use the rationale parameter to explain why this user talk page should be deleted. (E.g., {{db-u1|rationale= }}.) Thanks!

Per the User page guidelines, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons. In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libellous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight.

Users who have left Wikipedia may be added to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians.

• /Archive10
• /Archive11
• /Archive12
• /Archive13

GA Thanks

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that has contributed to the recent WP:GA promotion of Philip Humber's perfect game

This user helped promote Philip Humber's perfect game to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You have now been asked multiple times by multiple editors to stop trying to reinsert that trivial piece of drought information into many different articles. If you continue to insert it in a WP:POINT like way against consensus you will be blocked. -DJSasso (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

You make many useful maintenance edits and so I wish you would avoid making edits that a consensus of editors have agreed are not an improvement, as this just wastes everyone's time. If you have any new discussion points that have not been raised before, please feel free to raise them on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey page (to keep the discussion in one place). Rest assured that your previous comments on this subject have been read and considered, so you do not need to restate them. I hope you will engage with others and try to build consensus, rather than simply proceeding ahead without discussion. isaacl (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

For baseball-related matters, I encourage you to raise any new discussion points on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball page, and not continue with periodic edit/revert cycles. isaacl (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Have we not gone through this before? SNIyer12? Please stop re-adding the information-in-question, on hockey articles. GoodDay (talk) 19:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

You just did it again at 1996 New York Yankees season, even though we went through this in August, with Spanneraol also against you. I'm sick of this. I think it's beyond time we take this for an intervention. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

• A discussion on these edits of yours is ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#User talk:SNIyer12.23Disruptive editing. I think we would all appreciate it if you would join the discussion and help resolve these issues amicably. Resolute 17:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

SNIyer12, I suggest you wisen up & start responding to concerns 'here'. This snob approach on your part, is counter-productive. GoodDay (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AutomaticStrikeout 20:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Would you please comment at the ANI discussion?

Please comment at the ANI discussion...right now the consensus seems to be some sort of ban, which means I would suggest you explain yourself there. v/r Go Phightins! 02:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Hello, I'm Go Phightins!. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2011 Washington Redskins season without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Go Phightins! 04:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, particularly conducting slow edit wars to introduce your own opinions into articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

• In order to be unblocked, you must be prepared to discuss your own behaviour, and show that you understand how you have been causing problems. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2012 (UTC)