Talk:Puerto Rico: Difference between revisions
Coquidragon (talk | contribs) m Undid revision 522167172 by 24.54.198.59 (talk) In Wikipedia, we sign our comments. Why would you delete it? |
|||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
61 % or almost 2/3 of the vote, it is a clear mandate in any Democracy! Say the contrary is not respect the Democracy! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.54.198.59|24.54.198.59]] ([[User talk:24.54.198.59|talk]]) 12:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
61 % or almost 2/3 of the vote, it is a clear mandate in any Democracy! Say the contrary is not respect the Democracy! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.54.198.59|24.54.198.59]] ([[User talk:24.54.198.59|talk]]) 12:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:::Vote for statehood |
|||
In November 2012, Puerto Rico achieved a first clear electoral mandate rejecting the present form of territorial status, and requesting the U.S. Congress to admit Puerto Rico as the 51st State of the United States of America. In all earlier referenda, votes for statehood were matched almost equally by votes for remaining an American territory, with a small balance of votes cast for independence. Support for U.S. statehood has risen in each successive popular referendum until a clear majority of 61.2% was attained on November 2012.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.letpuertoricodecide.com/details.php?cid=4 |title=An Introduction to Puerto Rico's Status Debate |publisher=Let Puerto Rico Decide |accessdate=2012-03-29}}</ref><ref>[http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/07/politics/election-puerto-rico/index.html?iref=allsearch Puerto Ricans favor statehood for first time]</ref> The most recent referendum process began in October 2011 when [[Luis Fortuño|Governor Luis Fortuño]] proposed a [[bill (proposed law)|bill]], following the recommendation of the [[President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status]] to provide for [[self-determination]]. The proposed bill set the date of August 12, 2012 to hold the first part of a two-step status plebiscite. The first question on the plebiscite would ask voters whether they wanted to maintain the current commonwealth status under the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution or whether they preferred a non-territorial option. A second question on the plebiscite would offer three status options: statehood, independence or free association.<ref>[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42765.pdf Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions]</ref> This bill was brought before the [[House of Representatives of Puerto Rico]], then the [[Senate of Puerto Rico]] in 2011 to effect the governor's proposal. The bill passed on December 28, 2011. The date was revised such that both steps were voted on in a single ballot on November 6, 2012. As a result of that ballot, 54% of the population voted to change the territorial status quo, with 61.2% of the population voting for statehood as the preferred change from the status quo. <ref>http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57546260/puerto-rico-votes-for-u.s-statehood-in-non-binding-referendum/</ref><ref>http://www.ceepur.org/REYDI_NocheDelEvento/index.html#en/default/OPCIONES_NO_TERRITORIALES_ISLA.xml</ref><ref>http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Puerto-Rico-vote-could-change-ties-to-U-S-4014733.php</ref> |
|||
The Plebiscite proposal and guidelines was recommended by the following U.S. Government Reports: |
|||
*[http://charma.uprm.edu/~angel/Puerto_Rico/reporte_status.pdf ''Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2005) - President William J. Clinton.''] |
|||
*[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/documents/2007-report-by-the-president-task-force-on-puerto-rico-status.pdf''Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2007) - President George W. Bush.''] |
|||
*[http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/Puerto_Rico_Task_Force_Report.pdf ''Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (March 2011) - President Barack Obama.''] |
|||
*[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32933.pdf ''Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress - Congressional Research Service (CRS Report)''] |
|||
* [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42765.pdf ''Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions - Congressional Research Service (CRS Report)''] |
|||
The Democratic Party platform of 2012 says: |
|||
As President Obama said when he became the first President to visit Puerto Rico and address its people in 50 years, Boricuas every day help write the American story. Puerto Ricans have been proud American citizens for almost 100 years. During that time, the people of Puerto Rico have developed strong political, economic, social, and cultural ties to the United States. The political status of Puerto Rico remains an issue of overwhelming importance, but lack of resolution about status has held the island back. It is time for Puerto Rico to take the next step in the history of its status and its relationship to the rest of the United States. The White House Task Force Report on Puerto Rico has taken important and historic steps regarding status. We commit to moving resolution of the status issue forward with the goal of resolving it expeditiously. If local efforts in Puerto Rico to resolve the status issue do not provide a clear result in the short term, the President should support, and Congress should enact, self-executing legislation that specifies in advance for the people of Puerto Rico a set of clear status options, such as those recommended in the White House Task Force Report on Puerto Rico, which the United States is politically committed to fulfilling. The economic success of Puerto Rico is intimately linked to a swift resolution of the status question, as well as consistent, focused efforts on improving the lives of the people of Puerto Rico. We have made great progress for Puerto Rico over the past four years, including a sharp, historic increase in Medicaid funding for the people of Puerto Rico and fair and equitable inclusion in the Recovery Act and the Affordable Care Act. Going forward, we will continue working toward fair and equitable participation for Puerto Rico in federal programs. We support increased efforts by the federal government to improve public safety in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands, with a particular emphasis on efforts to combat drug trafficking and crime throughout our Caribbean border. In addition, consistent with the task force report, we will continue to work on improving Puerto Rico's economic status by promoting job creation, education, health care, clean energy, and economic development on the Island. |
|||
The Republican Party platform of 2008 and 2012 says: |
|||
We support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state after they freely so determine. We recognize that Congress has the final authority to define the constitutionally valid options for Puerto Rico to achieve a permanent non-territorial status with government by consent and full enfranchisement. As long as Puerto Rico is not a state, however, the will of its people regarding their political status should be ascertained by means of a general right of referendum or specific referenda sponsored by the U.S. government. |
Revision as of 00:02, 10 November 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Puerto Rico article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | Puerto Rico was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Puerto Rico. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Puerto Rico at the Reference desk. |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 19, 2004, November 19, 2005, November 19, 2006, November 19, 2007, November 19, 2008, November 19, 2009, November 19, 2010, and November 19, 2011. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
2006-2012 Economic depression
This article should have more information about the current economic depression in Puerto Rico, which started in 2006 and it's still ongoing. ★ Nacho ★ (Contact me) ★ 23:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
DATA Yes, the article should include actual data about income per head, and not data from the year 2009...At present, Puerto Rican income per head at PPP has been already surpassed by Chile and Argentina in Latinamerica, and by most Eastern European nations (Slovenia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Slovakia, Poland...)--88.8.210.171 (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
English translation for NPP
Several of the top leaders of Puerto Rico's governing party (NPP) and its government, including Gov. Luis Fortuño, the party president, and Secretary of State Kenneth McClintock, the party's chief spokesperson on the U.S. mainland,[1][2] translate "Partido Nuevo Progresista" as "New Party for Progress", rather than "New Progressive Party". They have a point because in 1967 (year of the nationally bipartisan NPP's foundation by a Republican leader) Spanish, "progresista" referred to being in favor of "progress", while the English word "progressive" in 2012 is almost synonimous to "liberal". This, New Party for Progress is a more accurate translation of "Partido Nuevo Progresista", since the NPP is a party that includes both Republican conservatives, such as Fortuño, as well as Democratic moderates, such as McClintock and Congressman Pedro Pierluisi.
Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions - Congressional Research Service
Could be updated the recent event section with the CRS Report Information?
Congressional Research Service Report
Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions
October 2, 2012
Congressional Research Service
By the way, the results of the 2012 Puerto Rican status referendum are in. It looks like a majority chose to do away with the current status, and a clear majority voted for full US Statehood. (According to El Nuevo Dia: http://resultados.puertoricodecide.com/2012/elecciones-generales/)
- Your statement (whoever you are) is not completely true. As per your source, 26% of the voters left the second question blank. So, only 45% of voters chose statehood, while 55% chose other options: None of the above (26% blank ballots), Sovereign ELA (24%), Independence (4%) or expressed their disagreement with the proceeding invalidating their ballots (1%). Clearly, less than 50% of voters chose statehood.--Coquidragon (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- I won't correct the edits done to the article until the count is over, but the line "Puerto Rico voted itself into statehood" is clearly misleading.--Coquidragon (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Statehood date
When will there be official info on Puerto Rico's date of statehood?? Georgia guy (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe never. It is not a foregone conclusion that Puerto Rico will become a state. Territories don't make themselves states. The United States Congress does. Cresix (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me? Mostly Mestizo?
In the statistics box. Where is the source for that? How can a population which was overwhelmingly white in 1900 be "overwhelmingly mestizo" when the vast majority of whites arrived in puerto rico after 1860 and the USA annexed it in the 1890s, and brought with it its anti-miscegenation laws and culture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.189.66.76 (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Location
The map location gives no idea where this is - wtf
- If you would bother to take one second (OK, may be one and one-half seconds) to click the image and look at it in enlarged form, you should be able to figure it out, assuming you know where the North American continent is located. Cresix (talk) 01:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Puerto Rico vote for U.S. Statehood
This article must be updated in relation to the 2O12 Puerto Rico Plebiscite requesting the Statehood and rejecting the current Territorial Status.
The first question on the plebiscite asked voters whether they want to maintain the current commonwealth status under the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution or whether they prefer a nonterritorial option. A second question on the plebiscite had three status options: statehood, independence or free association.
The result of the 2012 referendum is that 54% of the population voted to change the territorial status quo, and 61.3% of the population voted for the statehood. Puerto Rico vote for U.S. Statehood
Puerto Rico provided a clear electoral mandate rejecting the present form of territorial status and requested to the U.S. Congress to admitted Puerto Rico to be the 51st State of the United States of America on the November 6, 2012 Plebiscite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.54.198.59 (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Sometimes it helps to actually read the article before placing comments here. It was added to the article about one day ago. Cresix (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Eventhough the Puerto Ricans have voted to make Puerto Rico the 51st state, that request must be approved by Congress before it can physically be a state. The article is currently on semi-protection (meaning only registered users can edit) but I think it should be changed to full protection cause there are going to be a lot of edit warring to this page in the next couple of months. Snoozlepet (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- 26% of the voters left the second question blank, taking a political position against the options in this question of the referendum. So, actually only 45% of voters (not population) chose statehood, while 55% chose other options: None of the above (26% blank ballots), Sovereign ELA (24%), Independence (4%) or expressed their disagreement with the proceeding invalidating their ballots (1%). Clearly, less than 50% of voters chose statehood. If you look at actual count, 800,000 people voted for statehood. That's 22% of Puerto Rico's current population. You say "Puerto Rico requested to the U.S. Congress to admit Puerto Rico to be the 51st State of the United States of America." C'mon. Be serious. All these changes to the article are misleading and untrue.--Coquidragon (talk) 07:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Coquidragon: blank ballots (in this case, leaving the second question blank) cannot invalidate the choice that trumped among all three status choices (nor can they nullify votes cast, period: this is the case in any election). If you had an election between two candidates in a congressional district, 10 people showed up, but only three actually marked a choice on the ballot, then whichever candidate for Congress got two votes in that election would win. You can't penalize those that decided to make a democratic choice on account of those that decided not to - regardless of their reasoning. Only 38% of the voting population in the United States voted in the 2010 election: this doesn't render any of the elections that took place that year invalid.--Polisci101 (talk) 21:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Polisci101, I agree with what you say up to a point. There is no doubt in my mind that statehood won the referendum, a valid referendum in which 78% of registered voters participated. Statehood won with 62% of the positive votes to the 2nd question. What I disagree with is the text that states that there is a clear mandate for statehood. Leaving the ballot blank in this referendum was a choice, it was the instruction given by the 2nd largest party since its status wasn't included in the 2nd question. There is a lot of politics in the why's that I don't agree with. Yet, leaving the ballot blank in this specific referendum was a vote for "I don't want any of these." Of the people who showed to vote on the referendum, only 45% voted for statehood. Although the mandate from the referendum is indeed statehood as the choice with the highest number of votes, it is not a clear mandate in as much as less than half of the voters chose it. To this, we should add that due to corruption and bad politics, Puerto Rico apathy has grown to a point where only 66% of people in voting age (I didn't know about the 38% in the US, thanks and wow!) actually showed up to vote. When only 1/4 of the population of the island chose statehood, the mandate, however valid, loses strength. I don't know if I explained myself well. I agree with the results (although they are not my preference), but not with the lecture given to them. The current governor should indeed now pursue actions in accordance with the results of the referendum, but the US government (Obama's presidency to be more specific) made it clear that it will only act after a clear mandate is given. Less than 50% of votes is not a clear mandate.--Coquidragon (talk) 07:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
61 % or almost 2/3 of the vote, it is a clear mandate in any Democracy! Say the contrary is not respect the Democracy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.54.198.59 (talk) 12:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Vote for statehood
In November 2012, Puerto Rico achieved a first clear electoral mandate rejecting the present form of territorial status, and requesting the U.S. Congress to admit Puerto Rico as the 51st State of the United States of America. In all earlier referenda, votes for statehood were matched almost equally by votes for remaining an American territory, with a small balance of votes cast for independence. Support for U.S. statehood has risen in each successive popular referendum until a clear majority of 61.2% was attained on November 2012.[3][4] The most recent referendum process began in October 2011 when Governor Luis Fortuño proposed a bill, following the recommendation of the President's Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status to provide for self-determination. The proposed bill set the date of August 12, 2012 to hold the first part of a two-step status plebiscite. The first question on the plebiscite would ask voters whether they wanted to maintain the current commonwealth status under the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution or whether they preferred a non-territorial option. A second question on the plebiscite would offer three status options: statehood, independence or free association.[5] This bill was brought before the House of Representatives of Puerto Rico, then the Senate of Puerto Rico in 2011 to effect the governor's proposal. The bill passed on December 28, 2011. The date was revised such that both steps were voted on in a single ballot on November 6, 2012. As a result of that ballot, 54% of the population voted to change the territorial status quo, with 61.2% of the population voting for statehood as the preferred change from the status quo. [6][7][8]
The Plebiscite proposal and guidelines was recommended by the following U.S. Government Reports:
- Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2005) - President William J. Clinton.
- Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (December 2007) - President George W. Bush.
- Report By the President's Task Force On Puerto Rico's Status (March 2011) - President Barack Obama.
- Political Status of Puerto Rico: Options for Congress - Congressional Research Service (CRS Report)
- Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions - Congressional Research Service (CRS Report)
The Democratic Party platform of 2012 says:
As President Obama said when he became the first President to visit Puerto Rico and address its people in 50 years, Boricuas every day help write the American story. Puerto Ricans have been proud American citizens for almost 100 years. During that time, the people of Puerto Rico have developed strong political, economic, social, and cultural ties to the United States. The political status of Puerto Rico remains an issue of overwhelming importance, but lack of resolution about status has held the island back. It is time for Puerto Rico to take the next step in the history of its status and its relationship to the rest of the United States. The White House Task Force Report on Puerto Rico has taken important and historic steps regarding status. We commit to moving resolution of the status issue forward with the goal of resolving it expeditiously. If local efforts in Puerto Rico to resolve the status issue do not provide a clear result in the short term, the President should support, and Congress should enact, self-executing legislation that specifies in advance for the people of Puerto Rico a set of clear status options, such as those recommended in the White House Task Force Report on Puerto Rico, which the United States is politically committed to fulfilling. The economic success of Puerto Rico is intimately linked to a swift resolution of the status question, as well as consistent, focused efforts on improving the lives of the people of Puerto Rico. We have made great progress for Puerto Rico over the past four years, including a sharp, historic increase in Medicaid funding for the people of Puerto Rico and fair and equitable inclusion in the Recovery Act and the Affordable Care Act. Going forward, we will continue working toward fair and equitable participation for Puerto Rico in federal programs. We support increased efforts by the federal government to improve public safety in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands, with a particular emphasis on efforts to combat drug trafficking and crime throughout our Caribbean border. In addition, consistent with the task force report, we will continue to work on improving Puerto Rico's economic status by promoting job creation, education, health care, clean energy, and economic development on the Island.
The Republican Party platform of 2008 and 2012 says:
We support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state after they freely so determine. We recognize that Congress has the final authority to define the constitutionally valid options for Puerto Rico to achieve a permanent non-territorial status with government by consent and full enfranchisement. As long as Puerto Rico is not a state, however, the will of its people regarding their political status should be ascertained by means of a general right of referendum or specific referenda sponsored by the U.S. government.
- ^ https://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&¬e_id=10150636306261338
- ^ https://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved&¬e_id=10150177303986338
- ^ "An Introduction to Puerto Rico's Status Debate". Let Puerto Rico Decide. Retrieved 2012-03-29.
- ^ Puerto Ricans favor statehood for first time
- ^ Puerto Rico’s Political Status and the 2012 Plebiscite: Background and Key Questions
- ^ http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57546260/puerto-rico-votes-for-u.s-statehood-in-non-binding-referendum/
- ^ http://www.ceepur.org/REYDI_NocheDelEvento/index.html#en/default/OPCIONES_NO_TERRITORIALES_ISLA.xml
- ^ http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Puerto-Rico-vote-could-change-ties-to-U-S-4014733.php
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class Puerto Rico articles
- Top-importance Puerto Rico articles
- C-Class Puerto Rico articles of Top-importance
- C-Class Latin America articles
- Top-importance Latin America articles
- Latin America articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Caribbean articles
- Top-importance Caribbean articles
- WikiProject Caribbean articles
- C-Class Islands articles
- WikiProject Islands articles
- Selected anniversaries (November 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2011)