User talk:Iñaki Salazar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Inhakito)
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm sorry. 😔

Savvyjack23 (talk) 06:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Iñaki Salazar![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Deletion discussion in Spanish Wikipedia[edit]

Hi. Not sure if you are interested, but there's a discussion regarding the notability of an article I started on Spanish Wikipedia. It's an article on Dominican plastic surgeon Edgar Contreras (Spanish article here) I'm not sure if you contribute there, but feel free to add your 2 cents, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with my opinion to preserve the article. Thanks! Thief12 (talk) 01:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of José María Cabral Bermúdez[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article José María Cabral Bermúdez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article seems to be not really notable. It seems the article is only focused on a lawyer and that is it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winterysteppe (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Constanza helada.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Constanza helada.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t c) 04:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Aleppo[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Aleppo. (talk) 03:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Iñaki Salazar. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 21:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito Dutta (talk) 21:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help[edit]

Hi Iñaki Salazar,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Iñaki Salazar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected[edit]

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


Do not add fancruft tables like YouTube views to the article. They are fancruft and has no place in Wikipedia, especially sourced to crap website like Further addition will be reported. —IB [ Poke ] 12:25, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Talat Xhaferi[edit]

Hi Iñaki, are you working on this page? I plan to add translations from French and Macedonian shortly. --Dans (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Czech Republic[edit]

In Czech Republic, why did you change "20 °C (68 °F) – 30 °C (86 °F)" back to "20 °C (36 °F) – 30 °C (54 °F)"? Surely you know that 20 °C (a very comfortable temperature) does not equal 36 °F (which is almost freezing)?! And that 30 °C (quite warm) does not equal 54 °F (quite chilly)?! —Stephen (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I was the person who made this change and I would like to know why I got a message saying that my contribution was not helpful. It is blatantly wrong to convert 20ºC to 36ºF; 36ºF = 2.2º C. Please reinstate my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Stephen G. Brown,, and ELBee: The text does not talks about a temperature reading, but about the temperature difference between summer and winter: it says that summery temperatures are 20 to 30 degrees Celsius higher than wintry temperatures.

«On average, summer temperatures are about 20 °C (36 °F) – 30 °C (54 °F) higher than during winter.»

As an example, a 20°C reading is ten degrees Celsius higher than a 10 °C reading, which is a temperature of 50 °F. However it is wrong to say that the 20°C reading is 50 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the 10 °C reading, since when you sum those 50 degrees F to 10°C/50°F it gives you a total of 100 °F, which is 32.2 °C and not the original figure of 20 °C.
  • 20°C–10°C=10°C The temperature difference is 10 degrees.
  • 68°C–50°F=18°F The temperature difference is of 18 degrees, not of 50 degrees. So instead of being 50°F higher, it actually is 18°F higher.
Hence, when comparing temperatures, 20 °C becomes 36 °F instead of 68 °F, and 30 °C becomes 54 °F instead of 86 °F. Iñaki (Talk page) ★ 05:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I see what you mean. I think it would be easier to understand if it were expressed this way: 20–30 °C (36–54 °F). —Stephen (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Yep I get it too, my apologies. - eLBee — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


Hi, can you help me with user "Nathazzapaduch" in the page List of most viewed YouTube videos? He continues to enter irrelevant information, thank you--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 14:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)