Jump to content

User talk:Eeekster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vandalism tagging: new section
a note re: Rice Valley Wilderness
Line 25: Line 25:
[[User:Uberaccount|Uberaccount]] ([[User talk:Uberaccount|talk]]) 03:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Uberaccount|Uberaccount]] ([[User talk:Uberaccount|talk]]) 03:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
:Yeah, I know about the other pages. I'm hoping the PROD gets the message across to him. [[User:Eeekster|Eeekster]] ([[User talk:Eeekster#top|talk]]) 03:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
:Yeah, I know about the other pages. I'm hoping the PROD gets the message across to him. [[User:Eeekster|Eeekster]] ([[User talk:Eeekster#top|talk]]) 03:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
:Hey, just letting you know I cleaned up the article removed the PROD - you weren't wrong in that the pages he's creating are pretty broken, but they are existing designated wilderness/wildlife protected areas in California, so I'll take up the task of cleaning them up and giving them at least enough sourcing to represent a stub. [[User:Polarscribe|polarscribe]] ([[User talk:Polarscribe|talk]]) 07:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


== Vandalism tagging ==
== Vandalism tagging ==

Revision as of 07:18, 3 May 2013

Cayucas relisted

Hi - since you were active in a previous AfD discussion, I thought you might want to know that Cayucas has been relisted, since there are now additional references that arguably establish notability. Floatjon (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rice Valley Wilderness

Hello,

I endorsed your PROD tag for Rice Valley Wilderness. Just fyi, the user is creating a lot of similar pages (see [1]). Do you think an AfD for all of them would be a good idea?

Uberaccount (talk) 03:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know about the other pages. I'm hoping the PROD gets the message across to him. Eeekster (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just letting you know I cleaned up the article removed the PROD - you weren't wrong in that the pages he's creating are pretty broken, but they are existing designated wilderness/wildlife protected areas in California, so I'll take up the task of cleaning them up and giving them at least enough sourcing to represent a stub. polarscribe (talk) 07:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism tagging

You are correct, I only tagged it as vandalism given the content (the word "poo") of the article created at Patcham Fawcett at the same time. Thanks for the pick up. --kelapstick(bainuu) 07:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]