User talk:Crzrussian: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:55, 13 June 2006

Please click here to leave me a new message and I will respond on your talk page.

Archives of Old Comments

User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 1 includes comments through March 21, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 2 includes comments through April 9, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 3 includes comments through April 25, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 4 includes comments through May 6, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 5 includes comments through May 13, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 6 includes comments through May 25, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 7 includes comments through May 31, 2006, inclusive.
User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 8 includes comments through June 9, 2006, inclusive.

Finola Hackett

You're a user I trust often in notability issues. Could you take a look at Finola Hackett? She's the runner-up in the Scripps National Spelling Bee. As I said on the talk page, we only have 3 articles on champions (out of 79 competitions), let alone on runners-up. I'm trying to get some more users to review it because I'm not sure if it should be AfDed or not. Thanks in advance.

P.S. I'm a Passaic County resident as well. Metros232 03:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball stubs sorted

Just wanted to tell you that I've sorted the remaining Americans from the Category:Basketball biography stubs. Something still needs to be done about the category since all but 200 entries were Americans, so the new category already holds more than 1,000 articles. Valentinian ^(talk) 15:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA/Gurch

Thanks for the support, always useful to have a crazy Russian on your side. And congratulations on your own RfA, which seems certain now to succeed! – Gurch 16:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rican Day Parade

Thanks for creating the temp page. It's very nice! CoolGuy 17:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liozna

Shalom, I'd appreciate if you could take a look over at Liozna and vote for or against deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Liozna. Spaceeba! (....and be impartial, sefirat haomer notwithstanding :)) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs) .

I probably won't be around

When the result of you RfA comes around. So, I'll give out the congrats now and if in the off chance you lose, well: sorry. :P Keep it up and I'll see you around in the near future. Yanksox 18:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liozna and Larger than Life(books)

Hello. I have bundled the two together for the purposes of the Afd. If you agree or disagree, please make note in the Afd page here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liozna. Thank you -- Avi 18:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

Yeah, I just noticed, thanks, maybe it'll help you when you join us in a few hours in adminlandplace! -- Tawker 01:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, copyright problems. It really depends, I'd try IRC (#wikipedia-en-admins) or WP:AN - its a bit of a weird thing copyright problems :o -- Tawker 01:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that image

Hi Alexander. I don't know this user at all, but he seems to have been around contributing seriously (well, at least not completely non-seriously) so I only blocked for a week. It may have to be extended, if this user has had a history of inflammatory behvaioural history. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Your RfA

I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:

Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 04:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

Well, I am here. You really deserved this! Now you're going to keep cleaning up after all of our screw-ups! Yanksox 04:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflicted) Congrats!!! Kimchi.sg 04:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. A helping hand on the delete processing is very much appreciated.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG I can't believe I forgot support your RFA! That one's gonna haunt me! Anyway I'm sure you'll do a fantastic job. Congrats! --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 05:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, I didn't see that you were up for nomination but had I seen it you would have had my full support :) Congrats again! Metros232 13:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Hi Crazy Russian,

You'd earned it in my eyes with a particularly courageous call awhile back. Congratulations. Oh, and thanks for your help re the recent image deletion. Gotta keep this stuff of WP!Timothy Usher 04:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! You certainly deserve this! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 04:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

per above. :-) Andeh 05:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 05:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At the risk of repeating my RfA vote comment: in Soviet Russia, new admin congratulates YOU!!! :) -→Buchanan-Hermit ™/?! 05:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! :) --M e rovingian {T C @} 05:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your new tools and I know you will do a great job. --Dakota ~ 06:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster05.jpg Congratulations, comrade!

File:Red Army recruitment poster.jpg I want you to

File:Ussr0369.jpg Defend Википедия!

Sorry for taking up so much space. :D -- Миборовский 05:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posdravlenie, tovaritshch! If you need any help figuring out how to use you handy-dandy new powers, you know how to contact me :) Grutness...wha? 08:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!!!!--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 10:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! (And I look forward to arguing with you again!) Break a leg - ne puha ne pera! AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 12:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

(You opened yourself to it :) -- Tawker 05:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Truffles

Shape is definately the hardest thing to get right, there's just so many variables that can be slightly off and it'll not hold its shape easily. Just last Friday I took the same recipe, and used it to make truffle covered oreos and with the remainder I poured it into a small square (wax-papered) cake pan to harden in the fridge and broke it into fudge squares. (Shape was much easier that way). I'm glad to hear that you enjoyed them still. Charlie^{( t | e )} 05:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mazel Tov!

on your adminship.

JJ211219 05:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошая работа, друг! BD2412 T 14:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crzrussian

Where am I from? Hmm, It has been so long, do you know, I do not remember any longer. Beyond the depths of time I would imagine. My interest in editing Wikipedia is to bring fact into articles. I have noticed, unfortunately, that fact seems to be missing in some of the articles. Although there are some very good ones, as well. I thought I would try my hand at editing an encyclopedia, in any case. Theyshallsee God 05:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Kramer

Hi. Jesse Kramer popped up on my watchlist, and with no edits to it, I figured it was a repost--it is, twice over. Figured I'd just tell you as the prodder, rather than placing db-repost on the article.--Fuhghettaboutit 06:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your attaining adminship. My heartiest wishes! Regards, --Nearly Headless Nick 07:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Crzrussian, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. --Fir0002 08:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Cole Stefan

I had added the speedy delete tag to the Cole Stefan page, and you removed it, stating that notability was asserted. While the article says that he is famous, it gives no reason at all to believe so, and gives nothing even remotely verifiable. This seems to be in agreement with Wikipedia: deletion of vanity articles, which says that "For instance, "John Doe is good at chess" does not assert significance. "John Doe won the UK National Chess Trophy in 1994" does." It's no big deal, and the article is on AfD anyway now, but I just wondered... Is it a difference in interpretation of the Speedy delete for vanity bios, or is it a more strict rule and should I use the Speedy delete less (see e.g. also Cynthia Spiriti)? Fram 15:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vadium Technology

Hello Crzrussian,

Thank you for sending the newbie information. I'll continue to become more familiar with the policies and suggestions here.

In regards to your suggestion of deleting Vadium Technology, please consider that Vadium has taken a firm, controversial stand on a subject that affects everyone as we as a society increasingly rely upon electronic information and encryption of data.

Historically, all conventional encryption algorithms have failed given increases in computing power. Current advances (there are many examples but please take a look at the Sony Playstation which is essentially a supercomputer designed to work in a linux beuwolf cluster)are providing attackers ample means to successfully break traditional encryption algorithms (it's well documented that AES has been broken.)

The issue of significance of what Vadium represents is clear: Our societies increased reliance on information security has exposed a soft underbelly due to the widespread acceptance of encryption algorithms that are already failing.

Vadium has a solution that is very controverserial and has industry experts (Bruce Schneier)on the offensive. Our society / consumers need to have the opportunity to better understand where industry experts are leading us as these decisions today made by few have significant ramifications (identity theft is just the beginning) for many.

---perhaps this issue should be added to the submitted article. Your comments would be most appreciated.

Caz333sea 15:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)caz[reply]

Re: Finola Hackett

Thanks for the heads up. -- Kicking222 15:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And also, congrats on your adminship. You absolutely deserve it. -- Kicking222 15:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Norris

Well, it's kind of a philosophical question, and the answer depends on what you prefer: WP:IAR or WP:PI. If you do some out-of-process actions and nobody complains, it's generally OK. As for me, I prefer to act like I'm an ordinary user, and I don't think my admin duties include deleting every article I don't like. That may not be very efficient at times.

Bottom line: choose for yourself :) Conscious 15:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prod or WP:RM, to move disambig to Mike Norris (disambiguation) as well. Conscious 15:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmine Bleeth's mugshot

I wasn't personally attacking anyone. I was simply pointing out that the excuse that s/he used was pathetic, and I wondered if s/he felt any shame for what they did. That's not an attack. That's stating facts. Bcsurvivor 15:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hello, Crzrussian, and thank you for the supportive vote on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! - Kukini 17:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mazal Tov!

Mazal Tov on your successful RFA, I wish you much Hatzlacha with your new tools and making wikipedia even better! --Shlomke 17:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shkoyach! -- Avi 18:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks fer reverting that vandal on my userpage

thanks for reverting vandal on user page. Prometheuspan 19:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Typo at WP:AIV

Thanks for fixing my typo at WP:AIV just now. Very perceptive of you to catch it and figure out what I really meant. I should be more careful cutting and pasting. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Runescape: N0valyfe

On the deletion log, you said I was the only contributor. Did you not read my comment? I have First Amendment protection, and I can publish anything I want. So I dont care what the hell you're thinking about Runescape, I just think you're jealous of all the fans that play it. So you know what??? I'm just going to place in page after page of Runescape players until all of you fucking admins/editor will stop deleting. (I'm not kidding) --Webstergenius 20:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 199: / Line 199: @@
 Thanks for fixing my typo at WP:AIV just now.  Very perceptive of you to catch it and figure out what I really meant.  I should be more careful cutting and pasting. --[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 20:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
+== Runescape: N0valyfe ==
+On the deletion log, you said I was the only contributor. Did you not read my comment? I have First Amendment protection, and I can publish anything I want. So I dont care what the hell you're thinking about Runescape, I just think you're jealous of all the fans that play it. So you know what??? I'm just going to place in page after page of Runescape players until all of you fucking admins/editor will stop deleting. (I'm not kidding) --[[User:Webstergenius|Webstergenius]] 20:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)