Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Betchplus (talk | contribs)
102 edits
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 329: Line 329:


[[User:Betchplus|Betchplus]] ([[User talk:Betchplus|talk]]) 19:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
[[User:Betchplus|Betchplus]] ([[User talk:Betchplus|talk]]) 19:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

19:59:36, 9 July 2014 request for review by 204.56.102.2

{{Lafc|username=204.56.102.2|ts=19:59:36, 9 July 2014|link=
<!-- [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here]] OR [[Draft:iCrossing]] -->
}}

== 19:59:36, 9 July 2014 review of submission by 204.56.102.2 ==
{{Lafc|username=204.56.102.2|ts=19:59:36, 9 July 2014|pending=Draft:ICrossing}}


[[Special:Contributions/204.56.102.2|204.56.102.2]] ([[User talk:204.56.102.2|talk]]) 19:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:59, 9 July 2014

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category — List (sorting)		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply — By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


July 3

02:56:09, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Khan.207


Khan.207 (talk) 02:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC) I am trying to submit an article regarding Jawaid Akhtar Pasha, Urdu author. It was rejected due to lack of verifiable resources. I have hard copy documents that can verify all the information included in my article. However, this information is not available electronically, because it is in Urdu, is old or not many copies are available. How can I proceed so that the important work of a well known Urdu scholar can be included on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khan.207 (talk • contribs) [reply]

@Khan.207: As the reviewer noted on your draft, you lack any independent and reliable sources to establish notability. Further, some of the text has been copied from www.jawaidakhtarpasha.com/, which is not allowed. Wikipedia does not use self-published sources. Sources don't have to be online; You can cite newspapers, magazines, and books if you provide the title, author, name of the publication, date of publication, etc. Sources don't have to be in English either, although I personally refuse to accept articles if I can't read the source material. (I don't read Urdu.) Since this person is living, you'll have to use in-line citations. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06:14:21, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Edwengineering

I really don't understand this gibberish. Can anyone tell my why my wiki page was declined? Was it because of the external link? Edwengineering (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There will be an answer on the draft shortly. Fiddle Faddle 07:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done But your initial message did not endear you to me, and I nearly ignored you. This is not a business, this is run by volunteers. Try to be less confrontational when you ask for help. It gets you better help. Fiddle Faddle 07:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I did not mean any disrespect. It is just all these brackets are confusing and I did not know if my message was even going out. So we can't describe a business on Wikipedia?

A notable business, yes. An advert for it, no. Your own business is WP:COI, so not really, no. And not with that username, I fear. Fiddle Faddle 07:49, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:55:47, 3 July 2014 review of submission by SongsforLulu


Message for Timtrent, sorry if I'm not posting this in the right place.

Dear Tim,

Thank you for your prompt reply. I hope you get this message as I still haven't found a straightforward way of contacting you!! I don't want to state that Mr Weisbrodt is gay within the article. I find it inappropriate and unnecessary. I don't like to categorise people in this way and I felt uncomfortable about putting it in the Catebories box to be honest, although I can see this info might be interesting/helpful to some readers. I was wondering if you would accept putting the reference in the External Links section, they've done something similar in the Rufus Wainwright's Wiki entry with regard to some information that was not contained in the article itself. If this is not acceptable to you I'd rather remove the references to Mr Weisbrodt's sexuality from the Categories box.

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind Regards,

Lulu 09:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done Accepted. Now it must take its chance in the hurly burly that is WIkipedia. On to your next article! Fiddle Faddle 11:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11.00 3 July 2014 Request for guidance on article about Richard Pine

Can I have help with this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Richard_Pine Simon Baddeley (talk) 09:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sibadd: I have left a comment at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Pine which I hope you will find of use. Fiddle Faddle 11:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

11:57:01, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Made for Movement


Made for Movement (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi need to know why my article was not approved. If there is any chances I can do to get it approved, I would like to know.

Have you visited User:Made for Movement/sandbox where the reviewer has left a succinct comment? You have also created Draft:Made for Movmement. Please work on only one of these.
If you need someone to expand on the rationale for not accepting the draft please come back here and ask in this thread, or enter into a conversation with the reviewer who declined the article. Their rationale seems sound to me. Fiddle Faddle 12:44, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved your most current version to Draft:Made for Movmement; please make all your edits there, don't create multiple copies. I have left clear comments at the top of the page. MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And I've redirected the third iteration of the draft to the same. Bellerophon talk to me 22:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:24:12, 3 July 2014 review of submission by 103.247.50.163


pls tell me why my page is rejected ,,I need to how can I make those error correct to be accept on wiki as a page 103.247.50.163 (talk) 16:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:27:59, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Bourneon


Pls give me guide line to make this article accepted .. Need some help Bourneon (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bourneon: Your submission has no independent and reliable sources. You only have links to that company's website, which is not allowed. Also, "Division" doesn't have any claim to organizational notability. Articles about businesses have to be neutral, about notable subjects, and well-sourced. You also cannot use Wikipedia to advertise. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:49:27, 3 July 2014 review of submission by 192.95.197.60


192.95.197.60 (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2014 (UTC) why did shhoop da whoop get deleateds[reply]

@192.95.197.60: Because it was nonsense. Please read WP:FIRST for help. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:55:10, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Thefutonshop


This submission appears to be taken from http://blog.thefutonshop.com/2011/09/history-of-futon-shop.html. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. We cannot accept copyrighted content taken from websites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for publishing on Wikipedia. Copyrighted content can be cited as a reliable source if it meets Wikipedia's guidelines; however, your submission must be written in your own words, and in continuous prose.

We run http://blog.thefutonshop.com/2011/09/history-of-futon-shop.html. I wrote that so how is it copyright infringement? If you mean duplicate content than that is another issue.

How do I fix this problem? Can I use this text being that I wrote it? Or can I reference it in a more accurate way?

Do you need me to rewrite it all because of duplicate content?

Thefutonshop (talk) 22:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Thefutonshop: Please be aware that Wikipedia is not here to advertise for you. Your submission has to assert some notability and that can't be done by citing that company's own website. While I recommend you re-write that content in your own words, you could donate that text to Wikipedia which would eliminate the copyright issue. I'm not sure why this wasn't addressed before, but your username is in violation of our policy plus you obviously have a conflict of interest. Please read WP:FIRST and perhaps learn about editing Wikipedia before you continue. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

23:39:22, 3 July 2014 review of submission by Lauriemonk


I don't understand why the article has not been accepted. I contacted help desk and they advised me of the changes I needed to make, which I did. Can you advise me what it is that is missing that will get this article accepted? Lauriemonk (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems notable through her association with Seven the Hardway. Needs copy editing for neutrality, but after three declines on notability grounds, I see no point in dragging this out any further. It's in the main space. You may continue to improve it there. Bellerophon talk to me 06:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 4

00:52:23, 4 July 2014 review of submission by Victorychristiancenter2014!


Victorychristiancenter2014! (talk) 00:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with getting an article "Jimmie A. Ellis, III" accepted. The draft was declined on July 1, 2014. My instructions are to add citations to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. I would like to use government and media citationS and recognitions. Of course there are hard copies of the documents but how do I cite them correctly for the article?

The hard copy sources must be published for them to be useable. See WP:INTREF for help on adding references. Also, I'm afraid your username violates our username policy, you should look at changing it, and you appear to have a conflict of interest where this draft is concerned, so please remember that Wikipedia operates under a principle of neutrality Bellerophon talk to me 07:00, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10:28:29, 4 July 2014 review of submission by 122.163.241.82


122.163.241.82 (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore, IP of indef spam-blocked user. Bellerophon talk to me 13:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:24:41, 4 July 2014 review of draft by DurhamLass62


DurhamLass62 (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am trying to create a page on our local newspaper the Teesdale mercury User:DurhamLass62/teesdale_Mercury which has been the local paper since the 19C. It is a proper newspaper, with an historical archive section, http://www.teesdalemercury.co.uk/ http://www.teesdalemercuryarchive.org.uk/tm-history My question is: Can I use these sources to write an article about itself? Sorry. Very confused. DurhamLass62 (talk) 13:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, you can use those sources to support basic facts about the paper, but you will need to find reliable third party sources to demonstrate some dimension of notability for the paper. Bellerophon talk to me 13:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14:22:35, 4 July 2014 review of draft by 101.218.107.210


101.218.107.210 (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC) Article of india is the most precious detail for citizens of an indian. It is the very important that every one know about article of its country.[reply]

But you have achieved an empty submission. PLease add information and submit again. Fiddle Faddle 08:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect this already exists at India, or if something has been lost in translation Constitution of India... Bellerophon talk to me 08:16, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 5

07:40:17, 5 July 2014 review of submission by Arunima Dasgupta

Hello! My article was declined at Articles for Creation. I was wondering why my article has been declined. I would be glad if you could tell me my mistakes so that I can improve henceforth. Please help. Arunima Dasgupta (talk) 07:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined for failing to meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations; which is something of a misnomer, because the real problem is that the person you have chosen to try and write about just isn't important enough for Wikipedia. Sorry. Bellerophon talk to me 08:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08:56:56, 5 July 2014 review of submission by Jjhammett


Hello, I work at a university and 1 of the professors down the hall from me asked me to make a wikipage about him. I used all of the information her gave me and I cited his website and his contributions but other than the website and his own words there is nothing else to cite yet every time i resubmit i need more citations. Any suggestions?

Jjhammett (talk) 08:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Every time? I see only the one submission listed above. If you have created multiple copies under different titles, please consolidate them into one and blank the others. You can find any others by looking at the top of the screen and clicking "Contributions".
I have just declined the article, not yet for referencing. I find the prior review to be faulty, and the reviewer is aware that a number of recent reviews were imperfect. We are solving that problem, but there were many. I have declined it for the reasons I have given at the head which I hope are clear. I have not checked your referencing at this stage because I can;t quite determine which is referencing what. I will if you ask me to, once you have tidied the submission up a bit. Well, a lot.
Please may I advise you against a mutual wikipedia article circle. It can be tough when a well respected colleague asks you to create an article, and a refusal may be seen to be career limiting. So please do the best you can, something we will help you with by giving you the best reviewes we can (and we do, usually). But do not be tempted to repeat the prof's exercise in asking another to create an article on you.
WP:ACADEME is also of interest. Do read it. It shows you why Wikipedia is very different form Academe. Fiddle Faddle 09:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have now found Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony DePalma. Please choose one or the other to be the one that goes forwards. Merge the relevant information into the one you choose and then, please, empty the one you do NOT wish to proceed with of all content, to signify that it may be deleted. You are allowed to do this to article which you have created and are the sole editor of. Fiddle Faddle 09:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:41:35, 5 July 2014 review of submission by Rowantree1850


I am a new user and trying to include my first article which was declined, as the subject, a music hall comedian and actor called Harry Braham (1850-1923)was Not notable and I had not included enough references, I contacted the reviewer for help but have yet to receive a reply so I thought I would contact. The subject acted in numerous plays in the 19th and 20th centuries and appeared in 4 films one of which was Birth of A Nation. His career is verifiable through newspaper articles in the UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand and Jamaica, He performed by special request before the last King of Hawaii, and with Georgie Drew Barrymore and Agnes Booth - a well known actress and sister In law of John Wilkes Booth and toured with and was a friend of The Father of Vaudeville Tony Pastor. I am unsure how to proceed and exactly what references are required, his obituary was included in a number of papers such as New York Times and Variety which also detailed his career, his name is already included in a Wikipedia article on the play The Senator in which he played alongside William Henry Crane for 5 years I hope you can help--Rowantree1850 (talk) 09:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rowantree1850 (talk) 09:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obits are a great source of reference material, assuming they are published in WP:RS. Playbills, not so much, though they do confirm that he was in the cast list. Reviews of his performances are good. Newspaper articles in print or online are excellent. Reading WP:42 may help you a great deal, as will WP:REFB and WP:CITE. Fiddle Faddle 10:51, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:03, 5 July 2014 review of submission by Piwowath

I received this response when I first attempted to create this page. I don't know now to proceed.

Hello! Piwowath, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67)

Piwowath (talk) 15:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Piwowath: The message on your talk page doesn't explain why your draft was declined; we're working to correct that in the future. You have to go to the draft for the reason. In your case (just like everybody else's case) you don't have sufficient reliable and independent sources with which to make a claim of notability. If you could find discussion of this fire lookout tower in newspapers and published books, you could use those as sources. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 6

July 7

01:20:43, 7 July 2014 review of submission by Eliotevans

Hi can I please have some feedback as to why my article was not accepted and outline how I can change it to be Wikipedia approved? I need to create an article for Wikipedia about a local business person of note for an assessment piece. I have invested a lot of time into this process and would like to see it complete ASAP but am still figuring this out. Thank you for your time. Eliotevans (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eliotevans: It sounds like you're operating as a paid editor, which is problematic. Just to address the issues with the article, you'll note large text on the draft indicating Footnote codes go next to the fact they support, not just floating here at the bottom. You should adress that. Please see WP:CITE. Also, any sources like PRWire or PRWeb are just that, self-serving public relations puff pieces. You can't use those for sources, especially not when you need to establish notability. Try using this book to source that he holds a Guinness World Record as well as this article in the Brisbane Times. You want to maximize your journalistic, published sources. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

01:49:58, 7 July 2014 review of submission by 73.51.89.234

I received a declined message, but there was no explanation. I would like to understand why the article was declined so I know where I can make the appropriate updates. Please let me know what additional information is needed for this article. 73.51.89.234 (talk) 01:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@73.51.89.234: The explanation is on the draft. Please read that. I'll summarize for you: you don't have any reliable sources with which to make a claim of notability. Try using this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. You want to find every news article and published book that talks about the group and use those sources to write the article. You can't just write stuff you think sounds good and provide links to random websites. The sources I provided should be sufficient for you. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

04:53:08, 7 July 2014 review of submission by That Guy Corp

Why was the Gunwolf page rejected? Was it a formatting issue? There are already references to this project on other Wiki pages in regards to the soundtrack but there is no main page that discusses the comic and soundtrack itself, which has been widely covered by mainstream press. That Guy Corp (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined because it had only one referenced source, but you have already understood that and responded to it, so why are you asking us about something you have already dealt with, or is there something else we can help you with? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12:24:58, 7 July 2014 review of submission by Barmee

I'm not clear if I have now submitted my page for review or not. I know reviews will take time but can you tell me if it is now in the system please? Barmee (talk) 12:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely in, but it has errors. Do look at fixing those and adding more references while it awaits review. Fiddle Faddle 14:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:51:00, 7 July 2014 review of submission by Rcicorp

I am not sure what else we can do to submit this, this is our second attempt. We have what I would think are very valid citations. Any direction or help would be great. Thanks! Rcicorp (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this person so important they should feature in an encyclopaedia? They seem to be a fairly run of the mill businessman. From your username, you also appear to work for them... Bellerophon talk to me 17:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20:25:34, 7 July 2014 review of submission by Mdevlin54


I've added more sources to my page. I understand it not about quantity but about quality, It would very much appreciate it if someone could read my article and tell me which one of my sources are good to use and i should find more of and ones i shoudl stay away form. HAving an example of form the sources i have will help guide me in the right direction. Thank you! michelle devlin 20:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC) michelle devlin 20:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Michelle, it makes more sense to answer your questions here (though you've asked a similar question on my Talk page). I'm glad to hear you're keen to learn about Wikipedia and get things right.
As for Draft:Amazon Malaria Initiative, in my view the problems at the moment are (1) the reliance on sources by the lead organizations, leading to a slightly promotional tone (2) the tendency to talk about the general malaria problem and not about the specific goals and activities of AMI. I see you've tried to fix some of this, but the only source that might be okay and talks specifically about AMI (or the "AMI countries") seems to be source 2, the academic paper in the Malaria Journal.
Articles don't need to avoid using WP:PRIMARY sources altogether, but you'll need to convince us, at least, that AMI has been the subject of several meaty news sources/academic papers/journals. In general, try and avoid what AMI and it's lead organizations would like us to hear and, instead, write about what other independent sources have reported. Sionk (talk) 13:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:58:48, 7 July 2014 review of submission by Flawlessentrprs


I need to update he draft title to read Gustave Blache III. The a is missing in the first name on the current title. How can I make this correction?

Flawlessentrprs (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Bellerophon talk to me 13:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 8

12:33:37, 8 July 2014 review of submission by PersistentSys


Hi There,

I would like to understand what changes shall I make to the content in the page to publish it. I deleted all References from the page as the given references did not qualify in the review. Shall I delete the links mentioned in the External Links area? Can I submit an article that does not have External Links and References? Thanks for your help! PersistentSys (talk) 12:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PersistentSys (talk) 12:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason why this software meets the notability criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (software) or WP:GNG? If the answer is no, then it's not important enough to have its own Wikipedia article. To answer the second part of your question: reliable independent references are the key to demonstrating the notability of the subject; so no, the draft will not be accepted without reliable references. Bellerophon talk to me 13:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:53:20, 8 July 2014 review of submission by Jon talbot56


I previously submitted and revised in the light of advice so do not know what the problem is now. Please advise

Jon talbot56 (talk) 13:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have created three separate, but related drafts: User:Jon talbot56, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Work based learning (in higher education), and User:Jon talbot56/Negotiable Work based learning. Which one are we supposed to be reviewing? Also, none of them are currently submitted for review. If you let me know which one you want to keep, I'll help you resubmit it for review. Bellerophon talk to me 14:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:14:50, 8 July 2014 request for review by Blair Cromwell

Are newspaper articles considered credible sources for citing a submission?

Blair Cromwell (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Blair Cromwell: Yes. Please read our guidance on reliable sources and our instructions on how to cite sources. Be advised, copying text wholesale from this article comes very close to violating our policy on copyright violation. Furthermore, since you are the "communications director at the Bentonville Convention and Visitors Bureau" (as quoted in that article), you have a conflict of interest. Please be careful to maintain neutrality. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:42:44, 8 July 2014 review of submission by 14.96.0.82

I have written this article in the name of the company what I have created. Every single word of this article is clearly true and genuine. I have already submitted the URL of the official site as reference. But, I don't know why the article was declined. Could you please help me in making this workout. 14.96.0.82 (talk) 17:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mescue/sandbox is a very simple, very short advert. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. We also require a very flat, neutral, formal tone. Whiel we want new articles we need them to be about notable organisations and topics. You have work to do finsing references for your draft. Please enoy finding them. Fiddle Faddle 22:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19:52:11, 8 July 2014 review of submission by 71.172.9.12


71.172.9.12 (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

⁄== 19:56:17, 8 July 2014 review of submission by 71.172.9.12 ==


71.172.9.12 (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC) −[reply]

19:56:47, 8 July 2014 review of submission by 71.172.9.12


71.172.9.12 (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20:16:05, 8 July 2014 review of submission by Sawanr

I am sorry, I am new to editing wikipedia, all I wanted to do is create a page for Live Presence Robot which is a new invention and patent filing is in process.

Sawanr (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have nothing to apologise for. Simply turn the text into "Dull biut worthy" (WP:NPOV), find references and that will be fine. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42 Fiddle Faddle 22:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:35:20, 8 July 2014 review of submission by Janvermont


When I log in and go to my sandbox, I get the following message.

This sandbox is in the Draft namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the This sandbox is in the Wikipedia namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the {{User sandbox}} template. template.

What happens if I follow either suggestion? I need access to the bottom of the page to learn the results of my submission. Thank you


Janvermont (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a foible of the process, one I have now cleaned up. Please proceed with the draft article as it stands. Fiddle Faddle 22:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


July 9

00:43:46, 9 July 2014 review of submission by Aron barbey


Aron barbey (talk) 00:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know how I can improve this submission. Thank you. Aron

Oh dear, you seem to be writing an autobiography. I have reviewed it, and it is written as an advert for you. Seriously, I suggest you leave it to someone else to wrote about you. If you simply cannot resist be prepared to do a lot of work to pare it down to simple facts. Fiddle Faddle 09:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Injectrom

www.injectrom.com injectrom is combined three characters, injection, atomized and angstrom. injectrom was founded by Mr. Abouzar Abbasi, from Iran. injectrom is a first international grade and intelligent fuel-injection test bench in Iran and middle east. the associate website will be deplyed until next month. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaaabbasi (talk • contribs) 08:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined as non notable. It is also an advert. Fiddle Faddle 09:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:26:43, 9 July 2014 review of submission by Byblos Bank


Can you please explain why cant we post our article? What is wrong with it? They first submission was saying clearly that this is an advertisement, but I have changed the text and linked it. What is still wrong?

Thank you

Byblos Bank (talk) 09:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Draft:Byblos Bank? The answer is pretty clear when you read what the reviewer has said. I have added some thoughts there, too
You need to be aware that your username is not appropriate, and that you will need to change it to one of an individual, not the corporation. Fiddle Faddle 09:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10:05:57, 9 July 2014 review of submission by Bwinterbotham


Bwinterbotham (talk) 10:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In general it is traditional to ask a question at a help desk. Might you consider asking yours? Fiddle Faddle 19:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14:17:01, 9 July 2014 review of submission by Simone Hancox

Jeremy Houghton

}}


Simone Hancox (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add a photo to my RICHARD FRANCE article. It is one of Mr. France and his beloved wife and partner, Dr. Elisabeth Frischauf. How do I do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmian (talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19:36:45, 9 July 2014 review of submission by Betchplus


The Scaled agile framework site had been taken down because of a copyright listed on the site. I had fixed the copyright along with making some additions to the article, so it would serve the public in a more concise fashion. The Scaled Agile Framework of SAFe is a globally adopted project management framework and tool that should be accessible to the public. Can we please move this article back to the Wiki Product site from my User site? Thank you!

Betchplus (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19:59:36, 9 July 2014 request for review by 204.56.102.2



19:59:36, 9 July 2014 review of submission by 204.56.102.2


204.56.102.2 (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=616272837"