Jump to content

Talk:Palm cockatoo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jubblubs (talk | contribs)
Distribution Map: new section
Line 15: Line 15:
The [[Cockatoo]] page has a different take on the relative position of ''Probosiger'' within Cacatuidae, with
The [[Cockatoo]] page has a different take on the relative position of ''Probosiger'' within Cacatuidae, with
a number of newer studies to support it. I've also faulted that page, for failing to cite the older but still valid study cited here.[[User:Sbalfour|Sbalfour]] ([[User talk:Sbalfour|talk]]) 22:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
a number of newer studies to support it. I've also faulted that page, for failing to cite the older but still valid study cited here.[[User:Sbalfour|Sbalfour]] ([[User talk:Sbalfour|talk]]) 22:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

== Distribution Map ==

I was wondering why it is that the distribution map only covers the Australian Palm cockatoo and not the species as a whole. I think this is very misleading and if I had not known the actual distribution of the palm cockatoo, I would have thought that the species is an Australian endemic. Since the article isn't about the one subspecies, I think the map should be changed to reflect the genuine distribution (which includes most of New Guinea)as can be seen on the IUCN redlist page: http://maps.iucnredlist.org/map.html?id=22684723 [[User:Jubblubs|Jubblubs]] ([[User talk:Jubblubs|talk]]) 17:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:58, 1 February 2015

Drumming photo wanted

Requesting a photo of the bird beating a drumming with a branch.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomics

The Cockatoo page has a different take on the relative position of Probosiger within Cacatuidae, with a number of newer studies to support it. I've also faulted that page, for failing to cite the older but still valid study cited here.Sbalfour (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution Map

I was wondering why it is that the distribution map only covers the Australian Palm cockatoo and not the species as a whole. I think this is very misleading and if I had not known the actual distribution of the palm cockatoo, I would have thought that the species is an Australian endemic. Since the article isn't about the one subspecies, I think the map should be changed to reflect the genuine distribution (which includes most of New Guinea)as can be seen on the IUCN redlist page: http://maps.iucnredlist.org/map.html?id=22684723 Jubblubs (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]