Jump to content

Talk:Rupert Murdoch: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
he's a son of a biatchhhhhh!!!

{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header}}
{{talk header}}

Revision as of 18:48, 7 November 2015

he's a son of a biatchhhhhh!!!

Template:Vital article

Better detail on early life 22/09/2013

[1] Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.</ref>

Murdoch was born Keith Rupert Murdoch on March 11, 1931 in Melbourne, Australia to Sir (the title being purchased) Keith Murdoch (1885–1952) and Elisabeth Joy Greene (1909–2012), daughter of Rupert Greene. Rupert Murdoch is of Jewish and English, Irish, and Scottish ancestry. His parents were also born in Melbourne. Keith Murdoch was a renowned war correspondent and later a regional newspaper magnate owning two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a faraway mining town.[2]. Later in life, Keith Rupert chose to use Rupert, the first name of his Jewish maternal grandfather. [3].[4]

References

  1. ^ Candour June 1984 issue (vol. XXXV, no. 6)
  2. ^ The encyclopedia of the history of American management (2005) Morgen Witzel Continuum International Publishing Group p393 ISBN 978-1-84371-131-5
  3. ^ Candour,(vol.XXXV,no.6}}June 1984 issue
  4. ^ Richard H. Curtiss, editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Murdock tweets: "... perhaps in Northern Pakistan, like Bin Laden."

Headine-1: Rupert Murdoch tweets his theory on Malaysian plane disappearance

QUOTE: "Maybe no crash but stolen, effectively hidden, perhaps in Northern Pakistan, like Bin Laden." [I don't like to quote from Yahoo articles, but this covers Murdock moving into Tweets for politics very well. Of course, Murdoch is right, three times on the subject, in his Tweets .!.]

Review for unreferenced content and inappropriate tone urgently needed

I am not writing this as a supporter of Murdoch, but the page has been vulnerable to content that is entered without supporting citations. The content has been written from an opposing viewpoint at times. I have deleted and/or replaced some entries, but have not been able to review the entire page yet.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulparadox (talkcontribs) 05:04, 28 July 2014

National Geographic

Why is there no mention in the article of Murdoch's recent take over of National Geographic? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.162.133.112 (talk) 11:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He has also been praised by the previous CEO [1]. It does appear that he laid off 9% of the staff, although if we can find a more credible source to cite than ifyouonlynews.com, I think that would be fine to add in a neutral manner. -TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]