Anti-abortion movements: Difference between revisions
Craigrottman (talk | contribs) m Edit punctuation and wording for clarity and consistency |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{redirect|Pro-life}} |
{{redirect|Pro-life}} |
||
{{refimprove article|date=August 2015}} |
{{refimprove article|date=August 2015}} |
||
'''Anti-abortion movements''' are involved in the [[abortion debate]] |
'''Anti-abortion movements''' are involved in the [[abortion debate]] advcating against the practice of [[abortion]] and its legality. Many anti-abortion movements began as [[countermovement]]s in response to legalization of elective abortions. |
||
==Terminology== |
==Terminology== |
||
Revision as of 15:09, 11 December 2015
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2015) |
Anti-abortion movements are involved in the abortion debate advcating against the practice of abortion and its legality. Many anti-abortion movements began as countermovements in response to legalization of elective abortions.
Terminology
By some, especially in the media, the terms used in the debate are seen as political framing: they are terms used to validate one's own stance while invalidating the opposition's. For example, the labels "pro-choice" and "pro-life" imply endorsement of widely held values such as liberty and freedom, while suggesting that the opposition must be "anti-choice" or "anti-life" (alternatively "pro-coercion" or "pro-death").[1] The Associated Press favors the terms "abortion rights" and "anti-abortion" instead.[2]
However, some in the "pro-life" movement view the term "anti-abortion" as an inaccurate media label as well.[3] For example, not all who would describe themselves as "pro-life" are opposed to abortion if the life of the mother is in certain danger. Also, for many in the "pro-life" movement, the word "life" reflects the core value and truth for which they sincerely believe their causes represents.[4] An argument can be made that human life begins before birth (i.e., at conception, when the genetic material which will develop into a fetus first assumes zygote form and acquires unique DNA) and that human life is valuable and worthy of protection at all stages.[5] This view is heavily influenced by religious belief in most cases. There is significant philosophical dispute regarding whether human DNA acquires humanity and human rights upon first development or upon fetal viability.
Philosophical and legal arguments
Anti-abortion advocates cite numerous moral and philosophical arguments against both the acceptability or legality of abortion. Many advocates also hold religious objections to abortion.
Movements by country
Europe
In Europe, abortion has been legalized through parliamentary acts. In Western Europe this has had the effect at once of both more closely regulating the use of abortion, and at the same time mediating and reducing the impact anti-abortion campaigns have had on the law.[6]
- France
The first specifically pro-life organization in France, Laissez-les-vivre-SOS futures mères, was created in 1971 during the debate that was to lead to the Veil Law in 1975. Its main spokesman was the geneticist Jérôme Lejeune. Since 2005, the French pro-life movement has organized an annual March for Life.[7]
- Ireland
There are two major pro-life groups in the Republic of Ireland, Pro Life Campaign and Youth Defence.
- Liechtenstein
In Liechtenstein an application to legalize abortions was rejected by a slim majority in a referendum in 2011. The opponents, which included Prince Alois, got 500 votes more and eventually settle at 52.3 percent compared with 47.7 percent.[8]
Prince Alois had announced the use of his veto in advance if necessary to prevent the introduction of abortion.[9]
- Spain
In Spain, over one million demonstrators took part in a march in Madrid in October 2009 to protest plans by the government of José Luis Zapatero to legalize elective abortions and eliminate parental consent restrictions.[10]
In 2010 1,067,315 Spaniards signed a petition against the liberal abortion policy of the socialist government. The petition was launched by the organizations "Derecho a vivir" (right to life) and "Hazteoir" (Let your voice be heard).[11]
- United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, the most prominent pro-life organization is the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. It was formed to "uphold the principle of respect for human life, in particular the life of the unborn child" at the time of the passage of the 1967 Abortion Act which liberalized abortion law. It was the first such organization in the world.[12]
Israel
In Israel, the major pro-life organization is Efrat.[13] Efrat activists primarily raise funds to relieve the "financial and social pressures" on pregnant women so that they will not terminate their pregnancies.[14] Efrat is not known to do any other kind of activism.[13]
North and South America
- Canada
The Canadian organization Canada Silent No More advocates legislation prohibiting late-term and partial birth abortions.[15]
- Chile
The Chilean movement it's called Siempre por la Vida (always for the life)
- United States
The United States pro-life movement formed as a response to the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. A smaller movement is the consistent life ethic which started in 1983 and opposes all forms of killing, including abortion.
See also
- History of abortion law debate
- Philosophical aspects of the abortion debate
- Anti-abortion violence
- Crisis pregnancy center
- Pregnancy from rape#Opposition to legal abortion
- Fetal rights
References
- ^ Holstein and Gubrium (2008). Handbook of Constructionist Research. Guilford Press.
- ^ Goldstein, Norm, ed. The Associated Press Stylebook. Philadelphia: Basic Books, 2007.
- ^ http://www.nationalreview.com/article/363808/whats-pro-life-anyway-interview
- ^ http://www.aaplog.org/about-2/
- ^ http://www.catholic365.com/article/495/prolife-vs-antiabortion.html
- ^ Outshoorn, Joyce (1996). "The stability of compromise: Abortion politics in Western Europe". In Marianne Givens and Dorothy M. Stetson (ed.). Abortion politics: public policy in cross-cultural perspective. Routledge. p. 161.
...parliamentary decision are sustained by political parties which, in comparison to the United States, are deeply rooted in European society. The political parties have managed to regulate and pacify the political reform process, which in the decision-making stage marginalized opposition outside parliament.
- ^ http://www.euronews.com/2014/01/19/thousands-take-part-in-paris-anti-abortion-march/
- ^ "In Liechtenstein bleiben Abtreibungen verboten , 18 September 2011". FOCUS. 2011-09-18. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- ^ "Radikal für das Leben! , 08 September 2012". Zukunft CH. 2012-09-28. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- ^ "Agence France Presse, 17 October 2009". Google.com. 2009-10-17. Retrieved 2011-11-16.
- ^ "Spanien: Mehr als eine Million unterschreiben gegen Abtreibung , 23 February 2010". Blaue Narzisse. 2010-02-23. Retrieved 2014-12-17.
- ^ "History". Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.
- ^ a b "Efrat". Friendsofefrat.org. Retrieved 2011-11-16.[dead link]
- ^ "Pro-Choice vs. Pro-Life". Friendsofefrat.org. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
- ^ Canada Silent No More
