Jump to content

Talk:Guy Standing (economist): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there.
It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there.
I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --[[Special:Contributions/71.185.50.111|71.185.50.111]] ([[User talk:71.185.50.111|talk]]) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --[[Special:Contributions/71.185.50.111|71.185.50.111]] ([[User talk:71.185.50.111|talk]]) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

There's no reason for his picture to be of him pointing with both hands at a computer monitor, looking like a computer-befuddled godfather, either. Not only is it utterly harmless to have his picture be of him sitting, but the sitting picture is finely posed as an introductory photo of him - actually choosing a poorer-posed photo just to avoid the joke actually draws attention to it. [[User:HaniiPuppy|HaniiPuppy]] ([[User talk:HaniiPuppy|talk]]) 15:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:22, 12 January 2016

Proposed deletion

I'm pretty surprised by the proposal for deletion of this article.

Seriously, a quick look at Standing's website will easily demonstrate that he regularly published books, papers, and wrote pieces and gave interview for many newspapers. Last year, he was invited to more than 100 times to make conferences about his last book (The Precariat).

Also, as a former researcher for the International Labor Organization, Standing helped the academists to measure better precariousness with the creation of new indexes (i found them mentioned on the french page for economic indexes here. You'll also find his name on the wikipedia page of the ILO. (will update the article about this in the future).

All in all, i reckon the current version of the article may be too short and not sourced enough. But please, instead of deleting it, help me improve it! Let me know what you think is missing? What is unclear? not enough sourced? and so on. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanjourdan (talkcontribs) 22:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2015

Guy Standing sitting 137.43.188.253 (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Terribly witty I'm sure, but not an actual request. Please reopen this request by changing answered=yes to answered=no and providing your request in the form of "Please change X to Y" providing any necessary sources. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 12:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Standing to Guy sitting

Guy standing to sitting, in Ottobrunn (Germany), attending the BIEN Congress in 2012. Because you are wrong guys. He's sitting. SwegBEFMN (talk) 10:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - but almost funny ;-) - Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Guy Standing sitting in..."

Please put some form of edit protection. People keep vandalizing the page with "Guy Standing sitting" (see edit history). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.145.146.223 (talk) 11:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's accurate, though. The photo is of Guy Standing, sitting, so it isn't really vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:4401:5FAD:B578:DD86:2D32:3DEA (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there. I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --71.185.50.111 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason for his picture to be of him pointing with both hands at a computer monitor, looking like a computer-befuddled godfather, either. Not only is it utterly harmless to have his picture be of him sitting, but the sitting picture is finely posed as an introductory photo of him - actually choosing a poorer-posed photo just to avoid the joke actually draws attention to it. HaniiPuppy (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]