Talk:Guy Standing (economist): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
HaniiPuppy (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there. |
It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there. |
||
I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --[[Special:Contributions/71.185.50.111|71.185.50.111]] ([[User talk:71.185.50.111|talk]]) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --[[Special:Contributions/71.185.50.111|71.185.50.111]] ([[User talk:71.185.50.111|talk]]) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
There's no reason for his picture to be of him pointing with both hands at a computer monitor, looking like a computer-befuddled godfather, either. Not only is it utterly harmless to have his picture be of him sitting, but the sitting picture is finely posed as an introductory photo of him - actually choosing a poorer-posed photo just to avoid the joke actually draws attention to it. [[User:HaniiPuppy|HaniiPuppy]] ([[User talk:HaniiPuppy|talk]]) 15:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:22, 12 January 2016
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed deletion
I'm pretty surprised by the proposal for deletion of this article.
Seriously, a quick look at Standing's website will easily demonstrate that he regularly published books, papers, and wrote pieces and gave interview for many newspapers. Last year, he was invited to more than 100 times to make conferences about his last book (The Precariat).
Also, as a former researcher for the International Labor Organization, Standing helped the academists to measure better precariousness with the creation of new indexes (i found them mentioned on the french page for economic indexes here. You'll also find his name on the wikipedia page of the ILO. (will update the article about this in the future).
All in all, i reckon the current version of the article may be too short and not sourced enough. But please, instead of deleting it, help me improve it! Let me know what you think is missing? What is unclear? not enough sourced? and so on. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanjourdan (talk • contribs) 22:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2015
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Guy Standing sitting 137.43.188.253 (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: Terribly witty I'm sure, but not an actual request. Please reopen this request by changing answered=yes to answered=no and providing your request in the form of "Please change X to Y" providing any necessary sources. Thanks, NiciVampireHeart 12:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Guy Standing to Guy sitting
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Guy standing to sitting, in Ottobrunn (Germany), attending the BIEN Congress in 2012. Because you are wrong guys. He's sitting. SwegBEFMN (talk) 10:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Not done - but almost funny ;-) - Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
"Guy Standing sitting in..."
Please put some form of edit protection. People keep vandalizing the page with "Guy Standing sitting" (see edit history). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.145.146.223 (talk) 11:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
It's accurate, though. The photo is of Guy Standing, sitting, so it isn't really vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:4401:5FAD:B578:DD86:2D32:3DEA (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
It's still just a pointless joke. There's no actual reason for it really being there. I suggest changing the picture to him not sitting. --71.185.50.111 (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
There's no reason for his picture to be of him pointing with both hands at a computer monitor, looking like a computer-befuddled godfather, either. Not only is it utterly harmless to have his picture be of him sitting, but the sitting picture is finely posed as an introductory photo of him - actually choosing a poorer-posed photo just to avoid the joke actually draws attention to it. HaniiPuppy (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Unassessed Economics articles
- Unknown-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Unassessed organized labour articles
- Unknown-importance organized labour articles
- WikiProject Organized Labour articles
- Unassessed politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Unassessed sociology articles
- Unknown-importance sociology articles
- Unassessed Philosophy articles
- Unknown-importance Philosophy articles
- Unassessed International development articles
- Unknown-importance International development articles
- WikiProject International development articles
- Unassessed United Kingdom articles
- Unknown-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Science and academia work group articles needing attention
- Biography articles needing attention
- WikiProject Biography articles