Chincha Islands War: Difference between revisions
grammar |
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Rescuing 4 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 0 sources. #IABot |
||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
*{{cite book |last=Tucker |first=Spencer C. |title=A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East: |
*{{cite book |last=Tucker |first=Spencer C. |title=A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East: |
||
From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=h5_tSnygvbIC&printsec=frontcover |year=1967 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |location=Santa Barbara, California |isbn=978-1-85109672-5 |ref= {{sfnRef|Tucker|1967}}}} |
From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=h5_tSnygvbIC&printsec=frontcover |year=1967 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |location=Santa Barbara, California |isbn=978-1-85109672-5 |ref= {{sfnRef|Tucker|1967}}}} |
||
* {{cite web |url=http://members.lycos.co.uk/Juan39/More_Peruvian_Ships_5.html |title=Old Peruvian ships |author= |page=4 |pages= |at= |language=Spanish |quote=Mentions ''Apurimac'' both under her original name, and under the name ''Callao'' without appreciating that they were the same ship |ref= |
* {{cite web|1= |url=http://members.lycos.co.uk/Juan39/More_Peruvian_Ships_5.html |title=Old Peruvian ships |author= |page=4 |pages= |at= |language=Spanish |quote=Mentions ''Apurimac'' both under her original name, and under the name ''Callao'' without appreciating that they were the same ship |ref=CITEREFOld_Peruvian_Ships |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20071014040350/http://members.lycos.co.uk:80/Juan39/More_Peruvian_Ships_5.html |archivedate=October 14, 2007 }} |
||
{{Refend}} |
{{Refend}} |
||
Line 241: | Line 241: | ||
*{{Cite web |url=http://historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?action=toc&bid=16 |title=Chile: A Brief Naval History |accessdate= 1 January 2010 |last=López Urrutia |first=Carlos |work=Historical Text Archive }} |
*{{Cite web |url=http://historicaltextarchive.com/books.php?action=toc&bid=16 |title=Chile: A Brief Naval History |accessdate= 1 January 2010 |last=López Urrutia |first=Carlos |work=Historical Text Archive }} |
||
*{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/world/americas/30peru.html |title=Peru guards its guano as demand soars in 2008 |accessdate= 2 January 2010 |author=NYT staff |date= May 30, 2008|work= The New York Times|publisher=New York Times |location=New York, New York }} |
*{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/world/americas/30peru.html |title=Peru guards its guano as demand soars in 2008 |accessdate= 2 January 2010 |author=NYT staff |date= May 30, 2008|work= The New York Times|publisher=New York Times |location=New York, New York }} |
||
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.historiadigital.es/art1_1.htm |title=España y la Guerra del Pacífico |accessdate= |
*{{Cite web|1= |url=http://www.historiadigital.es/art1_1.htm |title=España y la Guerra del Pacífico |accessdate=2 January 2010 |language=Spanish |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20091211095411/http://historiadigital.es/art1_1.htm |archivedate=December 11, 2009 }} |
||
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.histarmar.com.ar/InfHistorica/GuerraPacificoEspaniaChPeru/Pacifico1base.htm |title=Guerra del Pacífico - 1864–1865 Conflicto de España contra Chile y Perú |accessdate= 2 January 2010 |work=Historia y Arqueologia Marítima |language=Spanish }} |
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.histarmar.com.ar/InfHistorica/GuerraPacificoEspaniaChPeru/Pacifico1base.htm |title=Guerra del Pacífico - 1864–1865 Conflicto de España contra Chile y Perú |accessdate= 2 January 2010 |work=Historia y Arqueologia Marítima |language=Spanish }} |
||
*{{Cite web |url=http://www.soberaniachile.cl/norte2c.html |title=Liberation of the Chinchas |accessdate= |
*{{Cite web|1= |url=http://www.soberaniachile.cl/norte2c.html |title=Liberation of the Chinchas |accessdate=2 January 2010 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20080312050911/http://www.soberaniachile.cl:80/norte2c.html |archivedate=March 12, 2008 }} |
||
*{{Cite web |url=http://members.lycos.co.uk/Juan39/THE_WAR_WITH_SPAIN.html |title=The War with Spain of 1865–1866 |accessdate= |
*{{Cite web|1= |url=http://members.lycos.co.uk/Juan39/THE_WAR_WITH_SPAIN.html |title=The War with Spain of 1865–1866 |accessdate=2 January 2010 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20071231064328/http://members.lycos.co.uk:80/Juan39/THE_WAR_WITH_SPAIN.html |archivedate=December 31, 2007 }} |
||
Revision as of 07:07, 14 February 2016
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2011) |
Chincha Islands War | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1865 South America during the Chincha Islands War. Orange: Peru. Green: Bolivia. Yellow: Ecuador. Blue-Green: Colombia. Purple: Chile. | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Spain |
Peru Chile Joined in 1866: Ecuador Bolivia | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Juan Manuel Pareja † Casto Méndez Núñez |
Mariano Ignacio Prado Juan Williams Rebolledo |
The Chincha Islands War (Template:Lang-es) was a series of coastal and naval battles between Spain and its former colonies of Peru and Chile from 1864 to 1866. The conflict began with Spain's seizure of the guano-rich Chincha Islands in one of a series of attempts by Spain, under Isabella II, to reassert its influence over its former South American colonies. The war saw the use of ironclads, including the Spanish ship Numancia, the first ironclad to circumnavigate the world.
Background
Military expenditure greatly increased during Isabella's reign, and as a consequence, Spain rose to a position as the world's fourth naval power.[1] Spain engaged in colonial adventures in the 1850s and 1860s in regions as disparate as Morocco, Indochina, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic (which it briefly reoccupied).[citation needed]
At the end of 1862, Spain sent a scientific expedition to South American waters, with the covert purpose of reinforcing the financial and legal claims of Spanish citizens residing in the Americas.[1] The expedition was under the command of Admiral Luis Hernández Pinzón – a direct descendant of the Pinzón brothers who had accompanied Christopher Columbus on his voyage that resulted in the modern European discovery of America.[citation needed] Pinzón's squadron was composed of four warships: the twin steam frigates Triunfo and Resolución, the corvette Vencedora and the schooner Virgen de Covadonga.[citation needed]
The Spanish ships arrived at the port of Valparaiso, Chile on April 18, 1863. Spain had recognized Chilean independence since the 1840s, and the nations had maintained diplomatic relations. The expedition was cordially received, and the Admiral exchanged visits with local authorities. The vessels left Chile in July amicably and moved on to Peru.[citation needed] Even though Spain had never recognized Peruvian independence (declared in 1821),[1] the squadron received a friendly welcome at the port of Callao. They stayed in port for a few weeks and then sailed, bound for San Francisco, California.[citation needed]
Talambó incident
On August 4, 1863, an incident took place at the Talambó hacienda, in Lambayeque, Peru. The details are fragmentary; however, the episode involved a fight that broke out between two Spaniard residents and 40 local citizens. As a result, one Spaniard died and four others were injured.[2]
When news of the incident reached Admiral Pinzón, he returned with his fleet to Peru on November 13 and demanded that the government issue an apology and reparations be made to the affected Spanish nationals. In response, the Peruvians took the position that the episode was an internal police matter better handled by the Peruvian justice system and that no apology was due. At this juncture, the Spanish government in Madrid decided to also demand payment of Peruvian debts stemming from the War of Independence, and it sent deputy Eusebio de Salazar y Mazaredo to settle the issue directly with the Peruvian authorities.
Salazar arrived in March 1864, bearing the title of Royal Commissary. This was a deliberate insult to the government of Peru, because a Commissary is a colonial functionary, rather than an ambassador (the normal level of diplomatic contact during consultations between independent states). The snub doomed negotiations with the Peruvian minister of Foreign Affairs, Juan A. Ribeyro, to failure.
Chincha islands occupation
On April 14, 1864, in retaliation for Peru's refusal to pay an indemnity, the Spanish fleet seized the lightly defended Chincha Islands. The islands were the principal source for Peruvian guano resources. The Spanish placed the islands' Peruvian governor Ramón Valle Riestra under arrest aboard the Resolución, occupied the islands with 400 marines, and raised the Spanish flag. Spain considered these islands an important bargaining tool, as they were a major Peruvian economic asset and produced almost 60% of the government's annual revenue.[1]
The Spanish squadron also blockaded principal Peruvian ports, disrupting commerce and fostering a high level of resentment throughout Latin America. Spain expected little resistance from Peru, believing its military capabilities to be negligible. A proposal to exchange the islands for British-held Gibraltar was even entertained for a time. During this blockade, the Spanish lost the Triunfo after it was destroyed by an accidental fire.
The recently named Spanish Prime Minister, Ramón María Narváez disapproved of the unilateral actions taken by Admiral Pinzón and replaced him with Vice Admiral Juan Manuel Pareja, formerly Minister of the Navy. Admiral Pareja had been born in Peru, and his father, Brigadier Antonio Pareja, had died in Chile in 1813 while fighting for Spain during the Chilean War of Independence. Narváez's conciliatory opinion soon changed, and he dispatched another four warships to reinforce the Pacific fleet.
Admiral Pareja arrived in Peru in December 1864 and immediately opened negotiations with General Manuel Ignacio de Vivanco, the special representative of Peruvian President Juan Antonio Pezet. The Vivanco-Pareja Treaty was signed on January 27, 1865 on board the frigate Villa de Madrid. Peruvian popular opinion considered the treaty as detrimental to Peru's national honor. When the Peruvian Congress refused to ratify it, a general uprising followed and the government of General Pezet fell on November 7.
War with Chile
In the meantime, anti-Spanish sentiments in several South American countries (including Bolivia, Chile and Ecuador) increased. It was obvious to most observers that Spain had no intention of retaking its former colonies. However, Peru and its neighbors still remained wary of any moves that might foreshadow an attempt to reestablish the Spanish Empire. Given the climate of suspicion, no one was surprised when the Spanish gunboat Vencedora stopped at a Chilean port for coal and President José Joaquín Pérez declared that coal was a war supply that could not be sold to a belligerent nation.
From the Spanish point of view, the Chilean coaling embargo was taken as proof that Chile no longer was neutral. This was reinforced after two Peruvian steamers left the port of Valparaiso bearing weapons and Chilean volunteers bound for Peru. Vice Admiral José Manuel Pareja consequently took a hard line and demanded sanctions against Chile that were even heavier than those imposed upon Peru. He then detached four wooden ships from his squadron and dispatched them to Chile, while the Numancia and the Covadonga remained to guard Callao.
Admiral Pareja arrived at Valparaiso on September 17, 1865 aboard his flagship the Villa de Madrid. He demanded that the Spanish flag be given a 21-gun salute.[3] He deliberately presented his demand on the day before Chilean National Day (September 18). Under the circumstances, the Chileans refused, and war was declared a week later on September 24.
The newly named Spanish Prime Minister Leopoldo O'Donnell (who had replaced Narvaéz) ordered Admiral Pareja to withdraw, but the Spanish admiral chose to ignore the direct order. As he had no troops with which to attempt a landing, he decided to impose a blockade of the main Chilean ports. This action was unenforceable, since a blockade of Chile's 1,800 miles (2,900 km) of coastline would have required a fleet several times larger than what Pareja had at his disposal. The blockade of the port of Valparaiso, however, caused such great economic damage to both Chilean and foreign interests, that the navies of the United States and the United Kingdom, which remained neutral, nevertheless issued a formal protest.
Naval battle of Papudo
Even before Chile and Peru were formally allied, Spain had suffered a humiliating naval defeat at the Naval Battle of Papudo on November 26, 1865. During this engagement, the Chilean corvette Esmeralda captured the Spanish schooner Covadonga, taking the crew prisoner and seizing the Admiral's war correspondence. This humiliation was too much for Admiral Pareja, and he committed suicide two days later aboard his flagship.[4] Following the Admiral's death, the general command of the Spanish fleet in the Pacific was assumed by Commodore Casto Méndez Núñez, who quickly received a promotion to rear admiral.
War with Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia
On November 7, 1865, due to his unwillingness to declare war on Spain and vilification arising from his signing of the Vivanco-Pareja Treaty, Peruvian President Juan Antonio Pezet was forced out of office. He was replaced by his vice president, General Pedro Diez Canseco.
General Diez Canseco also tried to avoid war with Spain, and that similarly led to his downfall only 20 days later. On November 26, General Mariano Ignacio Prado, leader of the nationalist movement, deposed Canseco. The new government immediately declared its solidarity with Chile and its intention to declare war on Spain and to restore Peru's national honor.
Chile and Peru formally signed an alliance against Spain on December 5, 1865. The Peruvian Congress ratified this alliance on January 12, and two days later (January 14, 1866), Peru finally declared war on Spain. Chile's navy was weak, almost non-existent. To reinforce its Chilean ally, a Peruvian squadron under the command of Captain Lizardo Montero was immediately dispatched to the south. Among the ships in the squadron were the steam frigates Amazonas and Apurímac.
Ecuador joined the alliance on January 30, 1866 by declaring war on Spain that same day. Bolivia, under the command of General Mariano Melgarejo, also declared war on March 22, 1866. These moves resulted in all the ports on South America's Pacific coast becoming closed to the Spanish fleet. Argentina and Brazil refused to join the alliance, as they were embroiled in a war with Paraguay.
Naval battle of Abtao
Spain's Admiral Mendez Núñez sent two of his most powerful ships (frigates Villa de Madrid and Reina Blanca) south to destroy the combined Chilean-Peruvian fleet. The allied squadron had been placed under the command of Peruvian Captain Manuel Villar and had taken refuge at Abtao, a well protected inlet near the gulf of Chiloé in southern Chile. The Spanish squadron appeared at the entrance of the inlet on February 7, 1866, but the Spanish did not enter as they did not want to risk their ironclads running aground in the shallows. A cannonade lasting several hours was exchanged with little effect. In spite of being at anchor, without steam, and with some ships with their engines undergoing overhaul, the Allies mounted an energetic fight. The Covadonga, under the command of Lieutenant Manuel Thomson, managed to fire over an island and scored several hits on the frigate Blanca. The battle ended indecisively without further developments. Reluctant to enter shallow waters and realizing that a long range gun duel served no purpose but to waste ammunition, the Spanish commanders withdrew.
Williams and the Esmeralda were not at the anchorage on the day of the battle. The commodore had sailed to Ancud for coaling. On its way back to Valparaiso, the Spanish squadron captured a Chilean steamboat (the Paquete del Maule) that was transporting sailors to crew the new Peruvian ironclads Huáscar and Independencia.[5]
Bombardment of Valparaiso
The Spanish could not attack land forces, and they had been frustrated in attempts to engage the allied squadron at sea. The Spanish ships were isolated, short of supplies and losing hope of victory. When the Chilean government ordered that all vessels communicating with the Spanish fleet should be barred from Chilean ports, Admiral Mendez Núñez decided to take punitive actions against the allied ports. The Spanish fleet shelled and burned the town and port of Valparaiso on March 31, and destroyed Chile's merchant fleet.[6] All told, thirty-three vessels were burned or sunk. The damage to the Chilean merchant marine was catastrophic. Twelve years later, the total tonnage under the Chilean flag was still less than half of what it had been in 1865.
Battle of Callao
Admiral Mendez Núñez, displeased at having to resort to destroying defenseless targets such as Valparaiso and with the inconclusive result at Abtao, decided to change tactics and attack a heavily defended port. As a result, the Admiral set sail for the Peruvian port city of Callao. The Battle of Callao took place on May 2. After the battle, both sides claimed victory. Peruvian defenders claimed that they had halted the Spanish from regaining their lost authority and prestige in South America, prevented them from enforcing their demands upon Peru and to have forced the withdrawal of the Spanish fleet (technically correct, since Peruvian cannons fired the last shots in the battle). The Spanish claimed to have visited punishment upon its former colony. Spanish guns had managed to cause only limited damage to defenses, and most of the cannons and artillery (as well as buildings within El Callao itself) survived the battle intact.
Aftermath
Whether the suspicions of a Spanish scheme to recapture its former colonies had any basis in fact is unknown. Many in South America saw Spain's meddling in Latin America and its occupation of the Chincha Islands as proof of a long-range Spanish plot to reassert its influence over its previous colonial territories. The force sent by Spain, on the other hand, amounted to a mere squadron of ships with negligible capabilities for landing forces, and the intention may have only been to seize the islands for their valuable fertiliser resources as reparations and to regain some of Spain's lost prestige. Regardless of the reason behind the conflict, Spain found it impossible to hold their positions. With all ports south of Colombia closed to them for coaling and provisioning, the Spanish fleet withdrew from patrolling the South American coastline, vacated the Chincha Islands and returned to Spain via the Philippines, completing a circumnavigation of the globe in order to do so.
Order of battle
Spain
General Commanders
- Vice-Admiral Luis Hernández Pinzón (1863–1864)
- Vice-Admiral José Manuel Pareja (1864–1865)
- Rear-Admiral Casto Méndez Núñez (1865–1866)
Vessel | tons (L.ton) |
Speed (Knots) |
Armour (Inch) |
Main Artillery | Built Year |
Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ironclad frigates | ||||||
Numancia | 7,500 tons | 12 knots (22 km/h; 14 mph) | 5½ Iron belt |
34 200 mm guns | 1863 | At the time among the most powerful ships of the world. |
Screw-frigates | ||||||
Villa de Madrid | 4,478 tons | 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph) | - | 30 200 mm guns 14 160 mm guns 2 150 mm howitzers 2 120 mm guns 2 80 mm guns |
1862 | |
Almansa | 3,980 tons | 12 knots (22 km/h; 14 mph) | - | 30 200 mm guns 14 160 mm guns 2 150 mm howitzers 2 120 mm guns 2 80 mm guns |
1864 | Arrived to the Pacific in April 1866 only days before the Battle of Callao |
Reina Blanca | 3,800 tons | 12 knots (22 km/h; 14 mph) | - | 68 guns | 1864 | |
Berenguela | 3,800 tons | 12 knots (22 km/h; 14 mph) | - | 36 guns | 1864 | |
Resolución | 3,100 tons | 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph) | - | 1 220 mm guns 20 200 mm guns 14 160 mm guns 2 150 mm howitzers 2 120 mm guns 2 80 mm guns |
1861 | |
Nuestra Señora del Triunfo |
3,100 tons | 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph) | - | 1 220 mm guns 20 200 mm guns 14 160 mm guns 2 150 mm howitzers 2 120 mm guns 2 80 mm guns |
1861 | Lost in accidental fire in front of Pisco on the night of 25 to 26 November 1864 |
Steam-schooners
- Vencedora, Built 1861; Weight 778 tons; Speed 8 knots (15 km/h; 9 mph); weapons two 200 mm revolving guns and two 160 mm guns.
- Virgen de Covadonga, Built 1864; Weight 445 tons; Speed 8 knots; Weapons two revolving 200 mm guns at the sides and one revolving 160 mm guns at the prow. Captured by Chile at Battle of Papudo on November 26, 1865.
Steamboats
- Marqués de la Victoria – 3 guns
Sail transports
- Consuelo
- Mataura
Peru
General Commanders
- Captain Lizardo Montero
- Captain Manuel Villar
Screw-frigates
- Apurímac – Built 1854; Weight 1,666-tons; Speed 9.43 knots (17 km/h); Weapons thirty-four guns[7]
- Amazonas – Built 1851; Weight 1,743-tons; Speed 9.43 knots (17 km/h); Weapons thirty-three 200 mm guns – Beached at Abtao, near Punta Quilque, 15 January 1886
Steam-schooners
- Tumbes – Built 1854; Weight 250-tons; Speed 7 knots (13 km/h); Weapons two 68-pounder guns
Steamboats
- Chalaco – Built 1864 – 2 guns
- Colón – Built 1864 – 2 guns
Ironclad monitors
- Loa – Built 1854, conversion to ironclad ordered in 1864;[8] Weight 648-tons; Speed 10 knots (19 km/h); Weapons four 32 pdr. guns[9]
- Victoria – Built 1865; 1 gun
Chile
General Commanders
- Captain Juan Williams Rebolledo
Corvette
- Esmeralda – Built in 1854, 854-ton weight, speed of 8 knots (14.82 km / h), armed with two guns boat 12 lb, 16 smoothbore muzzle-loading guns of 32 lb and 4 smooth-bore muzzle-loading guns of 32 lb.
Steam-schooners
- Virgen de Covadonga – Built 1864; Weight 445-tons; Speed 8 knots (15 km/h); Weapons two revolving 200 mm guns at the sides and one revolving 160 mm guns at the prow. Captured by Chile at Battle of Papudo on November 26, 1865.
Transports
- Paquete del Maule – Captured by Spain; Speed 13 knots (24 km/h); armament 2 guns.
Steamers
- Maipú - Built 1855 in England; Acquired 1857; Displacement 450 tons; Speed 8 knots; armed with 1 68lb gun and 4 32lb guns
- Lautauro- Built 1852; Given by Peru to Chile for wartime use 1865; Displacement 450 tons
Notes
- ^ a b c d Tucker 1967, p. 1431.
- ^ Guinot 2009, pp. 307–308.
- ^ Burr 1967, p. 97.
- ^ Farcau 2000, p. 17.
- ^ NYT staff & April 10, 1866.
- ^ NYT staff & May 6, 1866.
- ^ Old Peruvian Ships.
- ^ Moore 1898, p. 1651.
- ^ Chesnau and Kolesnik 1979.
Sources
- Burr, Robert N. (1967). By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, 1830–1905. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - Chesnau, Roger; Eugene Kolesnik, eds. (1979). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships, 1860–1905. Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-8317-0302-4.
- Farcau, Bruce W. (2000). The Ten Cents War: Chile, Peru and Bolivia in the War of the Pacific, 1879-1884. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers. ISBN 0-275-96925-8.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - Guinot, Dolores Luna (2009). Conspiracy In Mendoza. Victoria, British Columbia: Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4269-2185-8.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - Moore, John Bassett (1898). History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - NYT staff (10 April 1866). "SOUTH AMERICA.; High-handed Movements in Bolivia--Miscellaneous. CENTRAL AMERICA. Revolution in Panama--Bogus Canal and Railroad Companies-The Barbacoas Gold Mines-The Mines a Failure-All the Miners Anxious to Return--Over One Hundred already Returned to Panama--Naval Matters". New York Times. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
- NYT staff (6 May 1866). "SOUTH AMERICA.; From the Seat of War--Great Preparations and "Great Expectations"--The Grand Movement of the Allied Fleet Again Delayed -- Paraguayan Spies and their Stories--The War Beginning to Affect the Finances of the Argentine Confederation. THE BOMBARDMENT OF VALPARAISO Letter from an Americal Naval Officer". New York Times. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
- Tucker, Spencer C. (1967). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109672-5.
{{cite book}}
: line feed character in|title=
at position 84 (help)CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - "Old Peruvian ships" (in Spanish). p. 4. Archived from the original on October 14, 2007.
Mentions Apurimac both under her original name, and under the name Callao without appreciating that they were the same ship
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
Further reading
- Barros Arana, Diego (1884–1902). Historia Jeneral de Chile (in Spanish). Vol. I–XVI. Santiago, Chile: Rafael Jover.
- García Martínez, José Ramón (1997). "La Campaña del Pacífico (1862–1866)" (PDF). Revista de Marina (in Spanish). Retrieved 1 January 2010.
- López Urrutia, Carlos. "Chile: A Brief Naval History". Historical Text Archive. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
- NYT staff (May 30, 2008). "Peru guards its guano as demand soars in 2008". The New York Times. New York, New York: New York Times. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
- "España y la Guerra del Pacífico" (in Spanish). Archived from the original on December 11, 2009. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "Guerra del Pacífico - 1864–1865 Conflicto de España contra Chile y Perú". Historia y Arqueologia Marítima (in Spanish). Retrieved 2 January 2010.
- "Liberation of the Chinchas". Archived from the original on March 12, 2008. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "The War with Spain of 1865–1866". Archived from the original on December 31, 2007. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)