Talk:Divya Bharti: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:30, 10 May 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Divya Bharti article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Divya Bharti was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 10, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled

hi This entire article is written in very poor English and does not make sense at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.193.82.252 (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you to take quick look at the article again with cool head.It has been developed by keeping English grammar in mind.you can also help to develop a page.thnks and happy editing.Rpaigu (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divya Bharti In 1993.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Divya Bharti In 1993.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:11, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divya bharti death photo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Divya bharti death photo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Divya bharti death photo.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DivyaBhartiCouples.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:DivyaBhartiCouples.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:DivyaBhartiCouples.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divya bharti still in 1993.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Divya bharti still in 1993.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Divya bharti still in 1993.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File Replacement

Please do not file with any other file again and again. All the users are requested to keep neutrality policy of wikipedia.thanking you.happy editingRavishankar (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ms.bharti in one of her movie.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ms.bharti in one of her movie.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ms.bharti in one of her movie.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:228 20 Divya Bharti.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:228 20 Divya Bharti.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:228 20 Divya Bharti.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divya bharti in 1992.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Divya bharti in 1992.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Divya bharti in 1992.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable and fake sources

I didnt go through all but these sources needed to be replaced with REAL sources. Not FAKE ones.

AND MANY MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Goshhh!!! This is a horribly written article. It uses many fake sources. The sources that don't claim anything about the subject. They are used just to fillup to look like information is sourced. I am giving regular editors one day to correct this article or else i am reverting it to this version.
And GA? NO! Its not even a C-class article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

agree this is indeed very disturbing. Except this one source [1] which is not very reliable all other are Junk sources. Do you know who added these source ? --DBig Xray 20:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This guy User:Dindriyena added all these sources and rewrote this article. It needs improving desperately but sources are hard to find. There are only a handful of sources not all are reliable.Shakirfan (talk) 04:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed all that crap and restored the article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 07:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official website Or Fan site

Hello, Pharaoh of the Wizards, I noticed you added <http://www.divyabhartiportal.com> as an external link. I'm under impression that it should not be there because it is one of those links normally to be avoided (#11). It would set a wrong precedent in my opinion, anybody can make a fan site and ask it to be added here. I Googled for a while but could not find any meaningful related to this Fan Site. It'd be helpful you could answer why it should be there. Thanks. Anup [Talk] 10:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh! Just noticed it's you who also add "her official website" [2] (Earlier site owner/manager did so. They also spammed this link at many other places as "official" -[3], [4], [5]). What makes it "official"? Website itself was registered in 2010 (Bharti died in 1993). If it indeed was her official website, I expect a reliable source saying so. Anup [Talk] 10:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Owner of website seems to call it a "generous" act that he runs this portal ([6]). I'm pretty much sure that it is a fake official site. Some fan made a website, called it official and spammed (..spamming -[7], [8]) it all over internet. I cannot find a single reliable source that mentions even once this alleged official site. Anup [Talk] 13:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Divya Bharti Portal Is listed official in IMDB

There is nothing wrong to have Divya Bharti Portal as official site on the wiki as MARILYN MONROE TOO HAS THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE INCLUSIVE IN WIKI. If they remain. We shall remain too. No one to the date poses the information about Divya then we do. You will find DBP has been inclusive in the wiki since 2010 and few times like this... the awkward reactions come to overtake it. It's is site run by a team from different nationality and nation. DBP solely is about divya bharti and you don't even find a name of a fan beyond Divya Bharti.

IMDB too enlists DBP as official site.

Could you take the the Marilyn monroe website before taking us down.PLEASE!

We don't have days and days to work and spend our time in wiki. Don't have so much time to argue. But we will time and again work on this page. And also if u guys are smart and intelligent we wouldn't think you would have spent so much of time for it (divya page)... you would have better used it for something else, some where else (for something good than just debate with us) THINK!!!

- dbp(admin)