Jump to content

Talk:The Tunnel (TV series): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 30: Line 30:


As for that, the spot checking I did—looking at selective parts and sentences, and finding mis-used and missing sources—says that the foregoing work needs to be done. Le Prof [[Special:Contributions/73.211.138.148|73.211.138.148]] ([[User talk:73.211.138.148|talk]]) 08:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
As for that, the spot checking I did—looking at selective parts and sentences, and finding mis-used and missing sources—says that the foregoing work needs to be done. Le Prof [[Special:Contributions/73.211.138.148|73.211.138.148]] ([[User talk:73.211.138.148|talk]]) 08:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

== third season of The Tunnel ==

* www.datereliz.com/serials/tunnel-season-3-release-date.html
: "The Tunnel season 3 release date is planned by Sky Atlantic for the spring of 2017. The date release of The Tunnel season 3 on DVD and Bluray will probably happen in summer of 2017."

Will there be a third season of The Tunnel? This source says so, but is it credible? Seems more like speculation than solid... Please add any well-sourced related info to the article. -[[Special:Contributions/71.174.180.38|71.174.180.38]] ([[User talk:71.174.180.38|talk]]) 22:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:29, 28 September 2016

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tunnel (TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator: Matthew RD

Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn  00:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


1: Well-written

Check for WP:LEAD:

  1. Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  Done
  2. Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  Done
  3. Check for Introductory text:  Done
    • Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):  Done
    • Check for Relative emphasis:  Done
    • Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):  Done
      • Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):  Done
      • Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):  Done
      • Check for Proper names and titles:  Done
      • Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None
      • Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None
      • Check for Pronunciation: None
      • Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):  Done
      • Check for Biographies: NA
      • Check for Organisms: NA
  4. Check for Biographies of living persons: NA
  5. Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  Done
    • Check for Non-English titles:
    • Check for Usage in first sentence:
    • Check for Separate section usage:
  6. Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  Done
  7. Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None
 Done

Check for WP:LAYOUT:  Done

  1. Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  Done
    • Check for Headings and sections:  Done
    • Check for Section templates and summary style:  Done
    • Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):  Done
  2. Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  Done
    • Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):  Done
    • Check for Works or publications:  Done
    • Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO):  Done
    • Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):  Done
    • Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER):  Done
    • Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL):  Done
    • Check for Links to sister projects:  Done
    • Check for Navigation templates:  Done
  3. Check for Formatting:  Done
    • Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):  Done
    • Check for Links:  Done
    • Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):  Done
 Done

Check for WP:WTW:  Done

  1. Check for Words that may introduce bias:  Done
    • Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):  Done
    • Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):  Done
    • Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):  Done
    • Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):  Done
    • Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):  Done
    • Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):  Done
  2. Check for Expressions that lack precision:  Done
    • Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):  Done
    • Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):  Done
    • Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):  Done
    • Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None
  3. Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  Done

Check for WP:MOSFICT:  Done

  1. Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  Done
    • Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):  Done
    • Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):  Done
 Done


2: Verifiable with no original research

 Done

Check for WP:RS:  Done

Cross-checked with other GAs: "Be All My Sins Remember'd", "Sometimes a Great Notion (Battlestar Galactica)", "He That Believeth in Me", "The Daedalus Variations", "Adrift (Stargate Atlantis)", "Lifeline (Stargate Atlantis)", "First Strike (Stargate Atlantis)", "Fata Morgana (Sanctuary)", Strike Back (TV series), Adam Carter, Lucas North, "Series 8, Episode 1 (Spooks)", "Series 8, Episode 8 (Spooks)", "Pavor Nocturnus" (Sanctuary), "Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks)", "Day One (Torchwood)", "Cyberwoman", "New Allegiances", "Split Loyalties", "The Tip-Off", "On the Brink", "Nuclear Strike" (Spooks)", Mad Dogs (TV series), Maya Lahan, Spooks (series 7), "The Curse of the Black Spot", "The Impossible Astronaut", Sanctuary (season 1), Nikita (Nikita character), Helen Magnus, Sanctuary (season 2), Spooks (series 3), "All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues", Strike Back: Project Dawn, "Pilot (Hawaii Five-0)", "The Hounds of Baskerville", "Looking After Our Own", Tom Quinn (Spooks), "Nest of Angels", Spooks (series 1)

  1. Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (not contentious)  Done
    • Is it contentious?: No
    • Does the ref indeed support the material?:
  2. Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  Done
    • Who is the author?:
    • Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
    • What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
    • What else has the author published?:
    • Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
  3. Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  Done
  4. Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):
 Done

Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:  Done

  1. Check for Direct quotations:  Done
  2. Check for Likely to be challenged:  Done
  3. Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA
 Done
  1. Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  Done
  2. Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  Done
  3. Check for original images (WP:OI):  Done


3: Broad in its coverage

 Done

Cross-checked with other GAs: "Be All My Sins Remember'd", "Sometimes a Great Notion (Battlestar Galactica)", "He That Believeth in Me", "The Daedalus Variations", "Adrift (Stargate Atlantis)", "Lifeline (Stargate Atlantis)", "First Strike (Stargate Atlantis)", "Fata Morgana (Sanctuary)", Strike Back (TV series), Adam Carter, Lucas North, "Series 8, Episode 1 (Spooks)", "Series 8, Episode 8 (Spooks)", "Pavor Nocturnus" (Sanctuary), "Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks)", "Day One (Torchwood)", "Cyberwoman", "New Allegiances", "Split Loyalties", "The Tip-Off", "On the Brink", "Nuclear Strike" (Spooks)", Mad Dogs (TV series), Maya Lahan, Spooks (series 7), "The Curse of the Black Spot", "The Impossible Astronaut", Sanctuary (season 1), Nikita (Nikita character), Helen Magnus, Sanctuary (season 2), Spooks (series 3), "All the Best Cowboys Have Daddy Issues", Strike Back: Project Dawn, "Pilot (Hawaii Five-0)", "The Hounds of Baskerville", "Looking After Our Own", Tom Quinn (Spooks), "Nest of Angels", Spooks (series 1)

  1. Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources:
    1. Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS:
    2. Check for Out of scope:
  2. Check for The range of material that belongs in the article:
    1. Check for All material that is notable is covered:
    2. Check for All material that is referenced is covered:
    3. Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered:
    4. Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge:
    5. Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):
b. Focused:
 Done
  1. Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH):
  2. Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):


4: Neutral

 Done

4. Fair representation without bias:  Done

  1. Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  2. Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  Done
  3. Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  Done
  4. Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  Done
  5. Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  Done
  6. Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  Done
  7. Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  8. Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  Done
  9. Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  Done
  10. Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  Done
  11. Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  Done
  12. Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None
  13. Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None


5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license)

Images:
 Done

6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Done

  1. Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  Done
  2. Check for copyright status:  Done
  3. Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):  Done
  4. Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):  Done

6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Done

  1. Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  Done
  2. Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):  Done
  3. Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  Done


As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, Matthew, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.

Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn  22:55, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, please forgive the lateness of my reply because I had to live without internet for the past three weeks due to some storms in my homeland last month. -- Matthew RD 17:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Tunnel (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page linked by the bot shows ratings for 2012, and The Tunnel is not listed on the page. So a source is still needed for the comments on ratings or viewership in the UK. --Prairieplant (talk) 03:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In re: GA review

It is indeed en route to being a good article. But, until someone: (1) Checks all lede sentences against the main body, to ensure the lede summarises the main body, and presents no original, unsourced material; (2) Reduces lede length by a third or so, so that it is commensurate with an article of its current length, for it appears now to be much more than a concise summary; (3) Checks citations appearing against content, to make sure that material is actually properly sourced, and not only apparently so; and (4) Ensures that all content, including cast listing, is sourced, in some fashion, then it is not yet GA. MBTA ("much better than average"), yes. GA, no, only by faith/assumed quality, and not by checked quality.

As for that, the spot checking I did—looking at selective parts and sentences, and finding mis-used and missing sources—says that the foregoing work needs to be done. Le Prof 73.211.138.148 (talk) 08:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

third season of The Tunnel

  • www.datereliz.com/serials/tunnel-season-3-release-date.html
"The Tunnel season 3 release date is planned by Sky Atlantic for the spring of 2017. The date release of The Tunnel season 3 on DVD and Bluray will probably happen in summer of 2017."

Will there be a third season of The Tunnel? This source says so, but is it credible? Seems more like speculation than solid... Please add any well-sourced related info to the article. -71.174.180.38 (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]