Jump to content

Talk:Santa Clara County, California: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot
No edit summary
Line 66: Line 66:


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 19:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 19:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

==Non-Hispanic whites==
It is confusing that Spanish-speaking people of mixed Native American and European descent are classified as 'white' rather than 'Other' or 'Native American'. Most articles would mention 'Non-Hispanic whites', but not this one. Can somebody please find and include this information? [[User:Humanophage|Humanophage]] ([[User talk:Humanophage|talk]]) 17:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:50, 11 November 2016

WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States: U.S. counties Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Cmt

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

I removed 'most county residents prefer to visit the many county or state parks in the hills surrounding Santa Clara Valley when they need to exercise.' from the section discussing the street network.

It seems very subjective. If that is not the case, feel free to readd it with proper references. --Jdeboer 1 July 2005 19:36 (UTC)

I proprose removing the links:

from External links as it should be in the Bay Area article instead, I think since it is about religion in the Bay Area, not about Santa Clara County. If there is no objection I'll remove it in the future. --JVittes 05:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reservoirs

Santa Clara County has an extensive reservoir system (170,000 acre-feet) that may (or may not) be worth a mention in the article. For an urbanized area, I think this is unusual. --67.125.30.188 18:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics Section

Where in the world did it say that Latinos would be a majority in 2010? They aren't even a plurality or even 30% of Santa Clara County's population right now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.170.110 (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History Section

In the "History" section, the following statement is made: "In 1882, Santa Clara County tried to levy taxes upon property of the Southern Pacific Railroad within county boundaries. The result was the U.S. Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), in which the Court extended Due Process rights to artificial legal entities."

Yet if you follow the link to the court case, it clearly states: "The Supreme Court never reached the equal protection claims. Nonetheless, this case is sometimes incorrectly cited as holding that corporations, as juristic persons, are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."

I suggest the following change: "In 1882, Santa Clara County tried to levy taxes upon property of the Southern Pacific Railroad within county boundaries. The result was the U.S. Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886). Some people incorrectly claim that the Court extended Due Process rights to artificial legal entities in their court decision. However, the Supreme Court never reached the equal protection claims. Nonetheless, this case is sometimes incorrectly cited as holding that corporations, as juristic persons, are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."

Proper citing to the various articles should be included in the County wiki entry. Tried100X (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History-making sheriff

Please reinstate the fact of Laurie Smith becoming the first elected female sheriff in California history...anyone who works for Santa Clara County(especially in the Sheriff's Department) should be aware of this, and report on it, providing the appropriate verifications where necessary(especially if that person lives there)...I trierd, but it was promptly deleted as a "lie"...which it ISN'T!...Baldwin91006 (talk) 02:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Picture

The picture montage under Santa Clara County is identical to the one in the San Jose page. And while it's true that all images are in Santa Clara County (on account of San Jose being in the county) I wonder is it possible to get a picture that shows more than just images of San Jose? There is surely more to the county than just one (admittedly large) city! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.129.76.68 (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Politics and reference to abbreviations for parties

A change was just made as of 18 April 2015, from DNC to DEM, with relevance to the Democratic Party. Maybe this is consistent with the other comparative term GOP. That would be the primary consideration, so it seems. Make sure to use similar terms for each party. DNC would be an appropriate opposite to RNC, which conveys the "National Convention" of either party (Republican or Democrat). But, GOP and especially the term DEM, seems to be slang reference. I'm guessing the change is alright; but, in this context, I'm not sure what's truly appropriate. Can anyone explain the rationale? Are there any other alternatives? Ca.papavero (talk) 22:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GOP stands for "Grand Old Party" and is a time honored synonym for the Republican party. DEM is just an abbreviation, hardly a slang reverence. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 23:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I picked-up the idea of DEM being "slang" from Wikipedia's own disambiguation page for that term.[1] I do realize it can also be an abbreviation. It depends on how its verbalized, usually. Anyway, it's thought for further considerations, if needs be. Ca.papavero (talk) 00:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just as DEM is clearer than DNC, I think REP would be clearer than GOP or RNC. But there's actually no need to abbreviate to three letters, so the best thing might be to write out "Democratic" and "Republican" in the table headings.—Stepheng3 (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Santa Clara County, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Hispanic whites

It is confusing that Spanish-speaking people of mixed Native American and European descent are classified as 'white' rather than 'Other' or 'Native American'. Most articles would mention 'Non-Hispanic whites', but not this one. Can somebody please find and include this information? Humanophage (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]