Talk:Trump: The Kremlin Candidate?: Difference between revisions
Sagecandor (talk | contribs) use both |
Srich32977 (talk | contribs) →GAR and B class?: new section |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 00:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC) |
[[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 00:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
== GAR and B class? == |
|||
Frankly the article does not merit B-class at this time, let alone GA. I'd do an immediate GA fail if I hadn't edited some of it. Reasons: syntax is akward, article is instable in terms of edits, POV is inplay do 2 links to other problematic and contentious Trump-related articles, contains unsourced/OR such as "Due to questioning from Sweeney, Trump abruptly ended his interview with the journalist." ''und so weiter'' – [[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 04:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:41, 17 June 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trump: The Kremlin Candidate? article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Trump: The Kremlin Candidate? is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by Sagecandor (talk) at 23:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notable film. Per WP:GNG. And per WP:NFILM.
- WP:GNG: topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
- WP:NFILM: widely distributed. historically notable. screened in a festival.
Sagecandor (talk) 00:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
GAR and B class?
Frankly the article does not merit B-class at this time, let alone GA. I'd do an immediate GA fail if I hadn't edited some of it. Reasons: syntax is akward, article is instable in terms of edits, POV is inplay do 2 links to other problematic and contentious Trump-related articles, contains unsourced/OR such as "Due to questioning from Sweeney, Trump abruptly ended his interview with the journalist." und so weiter – S. Rich (talk) 04:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class film articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Donald Trump articles
- Low-importance Donald Trump articles
- WikiProject Donald Trump articles
- B-Class Espionage articles
- Low-importance Espionage articles
- B-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- B-Class Journalism articles
- Mid-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- B-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles