Jump to content

Talk:Beguines and Beghards: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.6)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 29: Line 29:


I have NO idea what is meant by that phrase - and I'm a MA student in church history with a background in monastic studies. So could someone please expand it... [[User:Ender's Shadow Snr|Ender's Shadow Snr]] ([[User talk:Ender's Shadow Snr|talk]]) 10:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I have NO idea what is meant by that phrase - and I'm a MA student in church history with a background in monastic studies. So could someone please expand it... [[User:Ender's Shadow Snr|Ender's Shadow Snr]] ([[User talk:Ender's Shadow Snr|talk]]) 10:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Beghards had "banded together to build up the inner man"? What is that? It sounds like masculinist jargon. I think it's anachronistic and POV. --[[Special:Contributions/92.214.202.19|92.214.202.19]] ([[User talk:92.214.202.19|talk]]) 12:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 12:29, 22 June 2017

Corrections

Corrected some English without touching the established content Jeremynicholas 12:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

still exist

re Beguines still exist: see my talk page comment there. --Pjacobi 21:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded: there's a house in Boitsfort in Brussels. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.30.135 (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

What is the point of moving this just to switch the names? Adam Bishop (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An older Brussels date

The Terarken hospice in Brussels is listed as a marginal béguinage, established for the support of 12 poor women by the Clutinck aldermen between 1218 and 1226. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.30.135 (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article titled "Beghards and Beguines" when Beguines were by far more important?174.31.156.150 (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the introduction it is important to stress what Beguines stood for rather than what some of them were accused of doing. There is no evidence that beguines were influenced by Catharism and I do not see a citation for that. Discussion of the supposed "Free Spirit" heresy belongs in the body of the work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadewijchrevelations (talkcontribs) 16:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"whose roots are in spiritual community"

I have NO idea what is meant by that phrase - and I'm a MA student in church history with a background in monastic studies. So could someone please expand it... Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 10:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beghards had "banded together to build up the inner man"? What is that? It sounds like masculinist jargon. I think it's anachronistic and POV. --92.214.202.19 (talk) 12:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beguines and Beghards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]