Jump to content

User talk:Falastur2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
City players: new section
Line 269: Line 269:


[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Falastur2|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:2016–17 EFL Trophy]] into [[:2017–18 EFL Trophy]]. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and [[Help:Link#Wikilinks|linking]] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>[[page name]]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying--> If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 18:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Falastur2|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from [[:2016–17 EFL Trophy]] into [[:2017–18 EFL Trophy]]. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and [[Help:Link#Wikilinks|linking]] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>[[page name]]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying--> If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 18:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

== City players ==

Not so sure about "continuing", that was my first substantive editing in two years! its not so much the split but the name that jars with me, "contemporary" is something of a misnomer for players who left 14 years ago. If having one list it'd be good to have the extra league/cups detail for the whole list, but also a boatload of work. If making any modification I'd use the opportunity to get rid of the player of the year column, as it is redundant to the table. Plus sorting out the MOSFLAG issues. There are other issues too, of course, which played out on the talk page without much in the way of consensus. I've never really been that happy with the list, but I grew tired of the to and fro with Mancini Lasagne. [[User:Oldelpaso|Oldelpaso]] ([[User talk:Oldelpaso|talk]]) 20:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:29, 3 August 2017

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1923–24 Manchester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upton Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A-League results

Please see the comment I have put here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2014–15_A-League Silent Billy (talk) 12:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Women's football in England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |title=The ladies football team so good the men at the FA banned them |work=sunlightfoundation.com (transcribed from a work by [[The Sun (newspaper)|The Sun]] |date=3 September 2010 |accessdate=18

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Women's football in England, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Preston and Daily Record. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1926–27 Manchester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sub pages

Hi just wanted to say thank you for making up the matches attended sub page. I would really enjoy doing the same thing you do. I have lots to catch up on!!! I used yours as a template (I hope you don't mind!) as I enjoyed reading the ones you attended. It seemed to work ok for me so wanted to say thank you very much and hears to more editing!!! Davezo33 01:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, I always wondered what sub pages were anyway so it was good for a start to find and it was interesting. I found the page on your user page because I checked the contributions on the 2014-15 Lowland League as I edit the 2014-15 Highland League so I was interested to find out who did that page. I found mostly you edit it so looked on your user page and found the sub page. I don't think many Wiki users read each others pages as they just want to edit/update things but thank you for letting me use the style.

Davezo33 14:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Premier League International Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NYCFC draft picks

How's it going? I just wanted to let you know that I removed Category:New York City FC draft picks from all 10 pages containing players who were taken in the Expansion Draft because it should only contain players who were drafted in either the MLS College Draft, MLS SuperDraft or MLS Supplemental Draft. For this team, it would only be MLS SuperDraft. Just like what we do with NBA and NHL players. – Michael (talk) 19:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academy Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mirror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 New York City FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrés Mendoza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Connor Brandt

The article Connor Brandt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spurs 3-4 Man City

Hi there. I was just wondering why you haven't moved your userpage article User:Falastur2/Spurs 3 - City 4 into being an article? I can't imagine it would fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. Tiller54 (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Connor Brandt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connor Brandt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Brandt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

york away

Hi mate, I found the York City team for you, I used this web link citytillidie http://www.citytilidie.com/latest/york-away-199899/ a Man City website! I don't think the squad numbers are correct though, there is no page for Andy Dawson too. He had 32 games for York and that was his only goal! Nice too see you update your matches attended too, you go to Wembley often I see! My team Aberdeen have not had much luck this season but we are pushing for the Scottish Premiership this year. Will find more for you if poss, thanks again. Davezo33 21:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New York City FC Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 New York City FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I see you edited the Lowland Football League article to remove the statements of Edinburgh City being the champions. I had also removed these earlier, before putting them back. My calculation is that East Kilbride have a 14 point deficit and only 12 points available from their remaining four games, so cannot catch Edinburgh City. I think some online league tables are not up to date, but this one appears to be: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/lowland-league/table Maybe you can check? -- Walnuts go kapow (talk) 10:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of New York City FC records and statistics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chicago Fire and Matt Dunn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already on it. Take a look at the article history ;-) Oldelpaso (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Pirlo & NYC FC

Hi,

Regarding Andrea Pirlo's number. I saw him wearing 21 too, but don't you think that 21 could mean July 21? To my mind, we should keep Hernandez's number as 21 and leave Andrea without a number at least until July 21 or at least until NYC FC's website gets updated. What do you think about my proposition?? – Sabbatino (talk) 18:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hi mate, sorry for not responding to your notes on my page, I dropped off for a while as work just went crazy. I have more time at the moment, so jumping back in. Let me know if you still need/want my help with anything. Hope you are well Paul  Bradbury 21:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 New York City FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas McNamara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Manchester City F.C. navbox

Template:Manchester City F.C. navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Manchester City F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunderland and Roger East (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A question

Can you help me to break this table in two tables ? 2007–08 Liga II, because all the editions of Liga II has two separate tables. Thank you !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 22:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The rule is : In case of same number of points, the head-to-head match is taking into account, like in a knock out tournament. If it is the perfect equality in the 2 games: like 0-0 and 0-0. or 1-1 and 1-1, then the team with better goal difference is taking into account.

And if are 3 teams with same points, then a table in 3 is necessary. Do you understand now ?

There are just another 2 editions with same problem: 2008–09 Liga II and 2006–07 Liga II if you have time to break them.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is the head to head rule. [1] If you check the head to head results, you will see. What anything else can be ?--Alexiulian25 (talk) 23:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats for Man City victory tonight ! Have you been to the stadium ? Please when you have time just split the 2 tables, and keep the order of the teams, they are sorted by head to head records in case of same points. Thanks !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 23:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2006–07 Liga II - Last Season to change ! Thanks. In mean time I edited Cupa Romaniei seasons, have a look :)--Alexiulian25 (talk) 07:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kits

How do I make kit patterns? --Mahdi81 (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Lancaster

Hello. I would appreciate if the page regarding Joe Lancaster could be re edited or reassigned as it is confusing the careers of two totally separate people who happen to share the same name.

The first reference about Joe Lancaster from Stockport, born 28th April 1926, who played as a goalkeeper for Manchester United and then went on to play for Accrington Stanley is correct. However, he did not die on the 15 December 2015, I should know, he's my father and is still with us on this date (25th January 2016).

All the other impressive facts regarding the Joe Lancaster who was a fitness trainer for Manchester City and a renowned athlete, and who apparently died on 15th December 2015, are a totally different and unrelated person.

I have deliberately not edited the page myself (may have been interpreted as vandalism) as it seems to need major surgery, but have hopefully left it to more qualified contributors.

Thanks in anticipation.

(Hondie2128 (talk) 21:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

2016–17 Premier League

Hi,

I just saw that you reverted my edit at 2016–17 Premier League regarding what teams have qualified for next season. I just followed the source for that section saying that all teams down to Man United are secure, and have not calculated myself (WP:OR). Can you give me one scenario that results in Spurs being in relegation, thus proving the source is unreliable? Qed237 (talk) 09:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your explanation. I am a mathematician as well, and a huge fan of sports and stats, which is why I keep track of all leagues and scenarios of top European leagues at User:Qed237/sandbox4 (both to update tables, but also add new teams to Champions League and Europoa League when they qualify). I have also, as an example, done all math for AFC and the other World cup qualifications at User:Qed237/sandbox2#AFC World Cup qualification possibilities. The math interest and studies together with some programming courses at university has also lead to User:Qed237/sandbox4#Coefficient table where all possible coefficients and league ranking are determined. I have also made a computer programme for calculating all scenarios, but I am currently modifying it changing from function-based programme to object-based and also trying to reduce memory load so unfortunately I can not use it yet. And I have not had the time to do all math by hand, which is why I asked you for a scenario. It looks like you are right and I suggest we remove that source. Anyway, thank you very much for your response, it was a very good read. Qed237 (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canopy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New York City FC

Not sure why you reverted. The changes were all good. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz: OK. Let's try this a THIRD time. I reverted the edit on that page because it was a blatant attempt to bias the article by removing references to the club's owners, whom many fans aren't happy with. If there had been a general restructure of info on the page I wouldn't have minded, but it was a simple deletion of all pertinent info in the opening paragraph which the user in question didn't want highlighted. It's happened a lot on that page and that's why I instantly rollback any such changes I see.
Oh, and since it's taken this long to get this message to you - assuming that you even read this, on a page where you have no reason to be checking frequently - I just want to raise my unhappiness with your practice of simply deleting comments on your talk page if you don't want them there. It's a very deconstructive way of doing business and highly disingenuous. If you want to keep your talk page clean then fine - I've seen other users who do the same, but they respond by simply cut-pasting my comments back onto my own talk page along with their responses. It must take all of about ten seconds for them to do. The thing about what you do is it relies on me doing all the hard work checking your talk page history (and why should I ever need to check that?) to find that my comments have been deleted. There is no warning for me anywhere that I don't have to search for myself. It's only because I know you're an active user and I happened to find myself thinking about my comment and wondered if you'd replied that I even found it. Under other circumstances, I would never have looked, would've assumed you'd simply ignored me, and I would've gone back and simply reversed your revert of my edit assuming that you were being unreasonable. It did actually take me some time to decide that you weren't just being facetious and simply trying to avoid having to read any dissenting voices against your actions - especially given your history of deleting user talk comments and the way that your userpage paints you in a really bad light.
Look, to present the tl;dr version - if you want to insist that this discussion happens here, fine. Just, please do something more constructive to actually tell me that. Otherwise I'm going to assume that you're ignoring me and it's going to start a revert war. Falastur2 Talk 09:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You pinged me. Why wouldn't I read the message? What third time? Do you mean me reverting you, on my talk page where there's an edit notice asking editors to respond on their own talk page if I commented there and to leave a {{talkback}} template? Oh, yeah, I reverted your comments there because you didn't read.
What was deleted was that they were the league's twentieth franchise in the lede, which is covered in foundation section. Are the references and content needed there? That statement could be restored, but they're not a football club are they? You restored that in the edit as well.
You didn't leave an edit summary when you made the edit at the article. The fact that I can't read your mind is why you were reverted. That was also the reason I commented here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnstone's paint trophy logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnstone's paint trophy logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New York City FC Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York City FC Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City FC Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SanAnMan (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Falastur2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited City Football Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation for you

Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the...

Women's Sports worldwide online edit-a-thon

Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes
(including WOSO players)
are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport.

#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

The article Lowland Football League has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Legacypac (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Manchester City W.F.C. matches

Template:Manchester City W.F.C. matches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016–17 EFL Trophy into 2017–18 EFL Trophy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

City players

Not so sure about "continuing", that was my first substantive editing in two years! its not so much the split but the name that jars with me, "contemporary" is something of a misnomer for players who left 14 years ago. If having one list it'd be good to have the extra league/cups detail for the whole list, but also a boatload of work. If making any modification I'd use the opportunity to get rid of the player of the year column, as it is redundant to the table. Plus sorting out the MOSFLAG issues. There are other issues too, of course, which played out on the talk page without much in the way of consensus. I've never really been that happy with the list, but I grew tired of the to and fro with Mancini Lasagne. Oldelpaso (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]