Jump to content

User talk:Doug Weller: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 219: Line 219:
== Nonconstructive behaviour by an editor ==
== Nonconstructive behaviour by an editor ==


[[User:John Hill|John Hill]] engages in slow-burn edit wars to push some user-generated images uploaded by him on various WP articles. See for example[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovely_Professional_University&action=history]. I realised that the user continues the same unconstructive behaviour on multiple articles. It would be nice if an admin warns the editor regarding the issue. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/5.3.211.141|5.3.211.141]] ([[User talk:5.3.211.141|talk]]) 22:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
[[User:John Hill|John Hill]] has been engaging in slow-burn edit wars to push some user-generated images uploaded by him on various WP articles. See for example[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovely_Professional_University&action=history]. I realised that the user has been continuing the same unconstructive behaviour on multiple articles. It would be nice if an admin warns the editor regarding the issue. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/5.3.211.141|5.3.211.141]] ([[User talk:5.3.211.141|talk]]) 22:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:13, 7 November 2017

The current date and time is 12 July 2024 T 17:31 UTC.

User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller







Notice Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first...
Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia.

If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click here to start a new topic.
If I have not made any edits in a while, (check) you may get a faster response by posting your request in a more centralized place.



You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise. Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.

Wikidata weekly summary #284

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added LonghairMegalibrarygirlTonyBallioniVanamonde93
removed Allen3Eluchil404Arthur RubinBencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RfC vote validity. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning

My deletion of SummerPhDv2's comment was on the *exact* same basis as his deletion of my comment. He even used the boilerplate "Please refrain from using talk pages...for general discussion of the topic". Yet this is exactly what he was doing on the Talk:Stand (R.E.M. song) page. He's seen engaging in editorial commentary and extensive general discussion of the topic - part of which he himself explicitly calls "obnoxious sarcasm.." blatantly stating it as his opinion. He goes on to say how consensus and citations won't sway his opinions. How are his opinions cogent to Wikipedia? By all means, clarify for me how any of this isn't blatant hypocrisy. TheDarkOneLives (talk) 02:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on the talk page. Commentary including 8 citations is one thing, even if they also apologised for their sarcasm, a history of 9 years of using talk pages to complain about Wikipedia and its editors being leftwing/liberals without anything specific about the article is another. Doug Weller talk 11:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #285

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonconstructive behaviour by an editor

John Hill has been engaging in slow-burn edit wars to push some user-generated images uploaded by him on various WP articles. See for example[1]. I realised that the user has been continuing the same unconstructive behaviour on multiple articles. It would be nice if an admin warns the editor regarding the issue. Thanks. 5.3.211.141 (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]